Which was more likely (1972)? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 12:36:15 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which was more likely (1972)? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In a world where George Wallace didn't get shot in 1972, which presidential ticket that year was most possible or least impossible to ever have occurred?
#1
Wallace/Chisholm '72
#2
Chisholm/Wallace '72
#3
Both equally possible/equally impossible
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Author Topic: Which was more likely (1972)?  (Read 966 times)
Ragnaroni
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,377
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: 1.74

P
« on: June 25, 2023, 10:23:26 AM »
Wallace was gonna run if he didn't get shot. Isn't Chisholm a black lady? I wonder how Southern racists would react to mister "SEGREGATION NOW, SEGREGATION TOMORROW, SEGREGATION FOREVER" having a black female VP. Must be very confusing, 45D chess moment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 16 queries.