Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:44:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates?		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Why were Lake and Oz considered weak candidates?  (Read 1358 times)
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,198


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 23, 2023, 02:58:40 PM »
Quote from: riverwalk3 on March 16, 2023, 03:50:31 PM
Lake outperformed Masters by 4 points, and Oz outperformed Mastriano by 10. These are not small outperformances in swing states. I bet most people were initially optimistic on Oz when the initial returns saw him outperforming Mastriano by 10 points.

I honestly don't think anyone was even paying attention to that, especially when Oz himself was underperforming Trump severely in every county
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 23, 2023, 03:05:21 PM »
crudites. Tongue
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.208 seconds with 12 queries.