Why didn't Romney pick Santorum?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:52:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why didn't Romney pick Santorum?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why didn't Romney pick Santorum?  (Read 828 times)
Ragnaroni
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: 1.74

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 27, 2023, 03:49:21 AM »

Santorum had second place, would have helped Romney with dissatified right-wing voters (who were many afaik) and had more experience than Paul Ryan! The key one was that Romney was too "moderate" for the GOP and thus they didn't bother with him and Santorum was like Christian-right.

What on Earth happened there?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2023, 04:19:22 AM »

Santorum was a joke candidate whose most recent appearance in public life prior to deciding to run for president was losing re-election by 17 points six years prior. His campaign for president was seen as ludicrous and he himself was universally regarded as a right-wing extremist. Nobody suggested that Romney choose him as his running mate because the thought would have been absurd.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,302
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2023, 07:41:43 AM »

Beyond what Xahar correctly said, Santorum's success was also a fluke resulting from other (and in some cases more obvious/qualified/electable) anti-Romneys having already risen up, peaked, and fizzled out for a variety of reasons owing to gaffes. The examples I remember best are Rick Perry and Herman Cain. It would be like choosing Ben Carson as VP in 2016 if only his momentum had held on until Iowa.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2023, 12:00:33 PM »

Santorum's success was indeed driven by a "last man standing" kind of dynamic.

Santorum also was very much tied to the Bush foreign policy and was also very much on the extreme end of socially conservative candidates. While it might have ginned up some more support from the base, he doesn't get Romney over the top.

It might have flipped Florida, but then again Santorum was tied to Social Security privatization as well, so that could have been even worse than with Ryan.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,170
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2023, 12:14:17 PM »

Beyond what Xahar correctly said, Santorum's success was also a fluke resulting from other (and in some cases more obvious/qualified/electable) anti-Romneys having already risen up, peaked, and fizzled out for a variety of reasons owing to gaffes. The examples I remember best are Rick Perry and Herman Cain. It would be like choosing Ben Carson as VP in 2016 if only his momentum had held on until Iowa.
The whole logic of the Santorum campaign never really made sense because as has already been mentioned, his most recent election result was losing re-election by 17 points in a Swing State. Imagine if someone was fired from middle management at a major corporation and then applied to be its CEO. Santorum's campaign was taken about as seriously as that would be.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2023, 12:48:27 PM »

Beyond what Xahar correctly said, Santorum's success was also a fluke resulting from other (and in some cases more obvious/qualified/electable) anti-Romneys having already risen up, peaked, and fizzled out for a variety of reasons owing to gaffes. The examples I remember best are Rick Perry and Herman Cain. It would be like choosing Ben Carson as VP in 2016 if only his momentum had held on until Iowa.
The whole logic of the Santorum campaign never really made sense because as has already been mentioned, his most recent election result was losing re-election by 17 points in a Swing State. Imagine if someone was fired from middle management at a major corporation and then applied to be its CEO. Santorum's campaign was taken about as seriously as that would be.

Eh...Santorum's presidential campaign was an incredible example of being at the right place at the right time, but he won the Iowa caucus and came within single-digits in pivotal Midwestern states. He was taken quite seriously by the primary electorate.

As to why he wasn't considered as a vice-presidential choice, yeah, all the stuff in this thread applies.
Logged
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,355
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2023, 06:14:01 AM »

Santorum was a joke candidate whose most recent appearance in public life prior to deciding to run for president was losing re-election by 17 points six years prior. His campaign for president was seen as ludicrous and he himself was universally regarded as a right-wing extremist. Nobody suggested that Romney choose him as his running mate because the thought would have been absurd.
He is also problematic to google.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.