Bridgeport (CT) Mayoral D primary overturned - new election ordered
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:04:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Bridgeport (CT) Mayoral D primary overturned - new election ordered
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bridgeport (CT) Mayoral D primary overturned - new election ordered  (Read 455 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,710


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 01, 2023, 02:59:47 PM »

Quote
A Superior Court judge has ordered a new Democratic mayoral primary in Bridgeport, ruling that challenger John Gomes’ claims of unprecedented absentee ballot fraud merited a new election.

The judge ordered the two sides and city election officials to meet within the next 10 days to set a date for a primary. He is asking them to come up with a date by Nov. 17.
...
Attorneys representing the city said they will file an emergency appeal to the state Supreme Court, raising the possibility that the state’s highest court will be hearing legal arguments as voters go to the polls Tuesday.

Clark’s ruling does not impact actual voting on Tuesday, as the judge has no authority to halt an election.

https://ctmirror.org/2023/11/01/bridgeport-primary-election-ruling-ganim-gomes/
Logged
Open Source Intelligence
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 705
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2023, 10:25:56 AM »

Since these details were left out, video of two individuals stuffing ballot boxes provided by Gomes. For the rules regarding absentee ballots in Connecticut that's not kosher that they be handed to these individuals to do this as they are not qualified to receive them. Gomes lost by 250 votes where the absentee ballots put Ganim over the top. Gomes is running as an Independent against Ganim in Tuesday's election. The two individuals, one is the vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and works for the city and the other is a former city councilwoman, pleaded the 5th when asked what they were doing in the videos at a hearing.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,321


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2023, 05:01:15 PM »

Since these details were left out, video of two individuals stuffing ballot boxes provided by Gomes. For the rules regarding absentee ballots in Connecticut that's not kosher that they be handed to these individuals to do this as they are not qualified to receive them. Gomes lost by 250 votes where the absentee ballots put Ganim over the top. Gomes is running as an Independent against Ganim in Tuesday's election. The two individuals, one is the vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and works for the city and the other is a former city councilwoman, pleaded the 5th when asked what they were doing in the videos at a hearing.

In the context of this case, it's very obvious that they were committing voter fraud rather than merely committing a technical violation of Connecticut law on the delivery of absentee ballots. For example, the two districts they were reported to have delivered absentee ballots in had much higher absentee voter turnout than the other districts.

Hopefully Bridgeport just rejects the fraudster and is done with the whole episode.
Logged
FairBol
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,807
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2023, 08:56:11 PM »

In case you guys missed it, a judge for the Superior Court of Connecticut has found for the plaintiff in a BIG election fraud case. 

On Wednesday, Judge William Clark determined that due to mishandling of ballots, the result of a recent primary for mayor of Bridgeport CT is in "serious doubt", and that the Court is "unable to determine the legitimate result".  Thus, he has ordered that a new primary be held. 

https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/elections/bridgeport-judge-new-primary-mayoral-election-connecticut-2023/520-65f5d8b0-259f-4e47-9dc6-919a2a661b82


Here's the somewhat complicated part of this. 

The General Election for mayor is on November 7th; there is a possibility that plaintiff and challenger John Gomes will win that race.  If he does, no new primary will be needed, and Gomes will become the next mayor of Bridgeport; his lawyer says he'll withdraw the case. 

If incumbent mayor Joe Ganim should win the general election, the new primary will become necessary.  It's a bit unclear as to what would happen then. 


According to the CT Mirror, if Ganim were to win the new primary, he would be re-elected as mayor.  However, if Gomes were to win the primary, ANOTHER mayoral election would need to be held, according to the source (https://ctmirror.org/2023/11/01/bridgeport-primary-election-ruling-ganim-gomes/).


Anywho, things are a little bit weird right now in Connecticut's largest city.  Thoughts, anyone?
Logged
FairBol
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,807
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2023, 08:58:11 PM »

Since these details were left out, video of two individuals stuffing ballot boxes provided by Gomes. For the rules regarding absentee ballots in Connecticut that's not kosher that they be handed to these individuals to do this as they are not qualified to receive them. Gomes lost by 250 votes where the absentee ballots put Ganim over the top. Gomes is running as an Independent against Ganim in Tuesday's election. The two individuals, one is the vice chair of the Bridgeport Democratic Town Committee and works for the city and the other is a former city councilwoman, pleaded the 5th when asked what they were doing in the videos at a hearing.

In the context of this case, it's very obvious that they were committing voter fraud rather than merely committing a technical violation of Connecticut law on the delivery of absentee ballots. For example, the two districts they were reported to have delivered absentee ballots in had much higher absentee voter turnout than the other districts.

Hopefully Bridgeport just rejects the fraudster and is done with the whole episode.

Meanwhile, the Democrats in this state continue to claim that there's no evidence to prove the charges.  I'm even hearing rumors of a possible appeal.  Sad
Logged
FairBol
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,807
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2023, 03:59:29 PM »

Well, it appears that a November 17th primary will now be necessary, as Mayor Ganim has won in the General by 174 votes.

And what put him over the top? You guessed it...

...ABSENTEE BALLOTS (as well as a Ganim-reported "tabulation error"). 

I hate to say it, but I think Bridgeport just got "Bridgeported".  That is, "second verse, same as the first". 

Story from Connecticut Post
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.217 seconds with 12 queries.