How long could slavery in the South have persisted without the war or a different outcome? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:45:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  How long could slavery in the South have persisted without the war or a different outcome? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How long could slavery in the South have persisted without the war or a different outcome?  (Read 1227 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« on: March 21, 2023, 10:01:00 PM »

I think we’re discounting the possibility of a successful slave revolt, the population ratios were so skewed
How so?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2023, 11:02:50 PM »

i recall listening to a podacst about the civil war saying the pop ratio between free and enslaved in the south in 1860 was like 1:6 and that was only expanding due to birth rates


...The South was not 85% slave. More like 30%, with a few states (MS, SC, LA) breaking 50% but others like Arkansas and Tennessee being pretty low.
Say the 11 states of the Confederacy were, say, 55% slave or 60% slave in 1860, overall. How much would that have changed?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,481
United States


« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2023, 11:08:00 PM »

i recall listening to a podacst about the civil war saying the pop ratio between free and enslaved in the south in 1860 was like 1:6 and that was only expanding due to birth rates


...The South was not 85% slave. More like 30%, with a few states (MS, SC, LA) breaking 50% but others like Arkansas and Tennessee being pretty low.
Say the 11 states of the Confederacy were, say, 55% slave or 60% slave in 1860, overall. How much would that have changed?

I guess it'd be easier to imagine a Reconstruction black government holding in, say, a 65-70% black South Carolina or Mississippi? The states lower on the scale would still have much the same result.
I was thinking that the more blacks there are, there might be massive side-effects down the line societally. A south far blacker would have massive consequences.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.