How did the Masons become so irrelevant so quickly?

[PSOL]

The Mason’s were responsible for ushering in the current liberal era, out of around two centuries of conflict from the 1700s-early 1900s and remaining somewhat influential in politics under the table in Europe and the North Americas till about the Red Scare. The reason for the lack of appeal as a political force instead of a glorified frat remains clear, they pretty much succeeded in ushering capitalism as we now know it and in areas of heavy influence create a liberal regime to rule the rest of the world. Secondly, is because at that point people wanted something new as they became the new worldwide establishment after a bloody transitional period.

The prospective laymembers and grassroots want something else now, or else don’t exist as a loser class/caste anymore.

[PSOL]

As anyone familiar with the police in Britain could tell you, the Masons are certainly not irrelevant.

They don’t have majority control the ebbs and flow of capitalism anymore, or the largest market cap per other gangs of capitalism.

[PSOL]

As anyone familiar with the police in Britain could tell you, the Masons are certainly not irrelevant.

They don’t have majority control the ebbs and flow of capitalism anymore, or the largest market cap per other gangs of capitalism.

They never did, that was only a conspiracy theory.

They did, and they haven't had it worldwide since the early 1800s and the latter till the 1870s.

[PSOL]

As anyone familiar with the police in Britain could tell you, the Masons are certainly not irrelevant.

They don’t have majority control the ebbs and flow of capitalism anymore, or the largest market cap per other gangs of capitalism.

They never did, that was only a conspiracy theory.

They did, and they haven't had it worldwide since the early 1800s and the latter till the 1870s.

They want you to think that

No, they are legitimately irrelevant as nothing more than for rich geezers to get rich. The times for expansion are done.