If Clinton was elected President in 2016...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 26, 2022, 10:15:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  If Clinton was elected President in 2016...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think the 2020 election would've been a Clinton-Trump rematch?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 62

Author Topic: If Clinton was elected President in 2016...  (Read 2441 times)
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 577


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 25, 2022, 12:49:47 PM »

It is looking like 2024 will be a Biden-Trump rematch.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,135
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2022, 02:35:27 PM »

Doubtful. Not sure whether Trump could have sustained his cult of personality. Of course the Republican Party would not have gotten any less insane after a 2016 defeat.

Obviously the answer also depends on how close 2016 was.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2022, 03:19:40 PM »

No doubt Romney, McCain, and Lindsey Graham would say “told you so”.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2022, 06:11:27 PM »

At the very least I do think Trump would participate in the 2020 GOP primary. I don't know whether he would be too damaged as a loser at that point to win again or not. It's hard to say because he would definitely have still engaged in Big Lie talk after being defeated. Hell, he proliferated the conspiracy theory that he actually won the popular vote, so even after winning he was still a sore loser somehow.
Logged
El muerdago es mortal si te lo comes
MormDem
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,910
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2022, 07:48:20 PM »

Doubtful, because I doubt he wins the primary, and he likely is deplatformed.
Logged
BigVic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,174
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2022, 05:13:09 AM »

Would’ve lost to another Republican
Logged
Sir Mohamed 🇺🇸 🇺🇦
MohamedChalid
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,812
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2022, 10:55:43 AM »

Unlikely, especially if he loses by more than the 278 freiwall map.
Logged
Bojack Horseman
Wolverine22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2022, 07:59:17 PM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,157
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2022, 02:36:35 PM »

I doubt it. Trump would've been painted as a RINO by the base and would've been seen as too extreme by everyone else. 2020 after a Clinton win in 2016 would've either been the GOP's 1992 or they would've nominated someone who, while right wing, was more genteel and less outwardly offensive than Trump. At most Trump would've likely tried, and failed, to play kingmaker but that's it.
Logged
vileplume
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 537
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2022, 03:42:05 PM »
« Edited: September 27, 2022, 03:49:31 PM by vileplume »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

She would have won Virginia easily, albeit probably not by as much as Biden won it by. Nevada on the other hand would very likely have gone to Trump, there would have been a huge backlash in the tourism/service industry against President Clinton over Covid. Maine may have voted GOP for the first time since '88 too.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2022, 05:09:23 PM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

Hot take: due to the butterfly effect, there wouldn't have been a pandemic under her.

Don't get me wrong, she still would have been an unpopular lame duck regardless though.
Logged
darklordoftech
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,510
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2022, 05:56:12 PM »

She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd.
She could have built bridges with Bernie or Busters by doing the things Biden has been doing and vetoing “neoliberal” legislation.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2022, 11:57:45 AM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

Hot take: due to the butterfly effect, there wouldn't have been a pandemic under her.

Don't get me wrong, she still would have been an unpopular lame duck regardless though.

The bolded part is correct. Trump is the one who disbanded the pandemic preparedness team. Had Hillary been President, it would never have left China.
Logged
super6646
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 504
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2022, 08:33:12 PM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

Hot take: due to the butterfly effect, there wouldn't have been a pandemic under her.

Don't get me wrong, she still would have been an unpopular lame duck regardless though.

The bolded part is correct. Trump is the one who disbanded the pandemic preparedness team. Had Hillary been President, it would never have left China.

Ya no. Are we forgetting there were already cases in Italy and Iran weeks before this hit the US.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2022, 05:38:44 AM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

Hot take: due to the butterfly effect, there wouldn't have been a pandemic under her.

Don't get me wrong, she still would have been an unpopular lame duck regardless though.

The bolded part is correct. Trump is the one who disbanded the pandemic preparedness team. Had Hillary been President, it would never have left China.

Ya no. Are we forgetting there were already cases in Italy and Iran weeks before this hit the US.

Let me be bitter, okay?
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,007
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2022, 09:59:47 AM »

Bitterness that is not factually based is rarely healthy.
Logged
Anthropogenic-Statism
Anarcho-Statism
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,850
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -3.13


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 03, 2022, 02:25:17 PM »

I used to think not, but it's worth considering that Trump's movement has been one of the heartiest and most enduring in the party in decades, and that was before he even won the election. Events during her presidency would probably strengthen his appeal: COVID (no, the butterfly effect isn't some magic wand that can wave away the evolution of a virus halfway across the world because someone else is in the White House), deteriorating relations with China, societal upheaval (technological and outsourcing-based un(der)employment, climate change, sexual harassment, migration surges, police brutality, and the reinforcement of echo chambers by social media can't be handwaved away either), and the economic disruption inherent to those things. I also used to think he wouldn't want to run again after losing, but all signs point to a Trump run in our 2024.

However, someone else might have a shot at taking Trump's place by 2020, probably either DeSantis or Josh Hawley.
Logged
Pres Mike
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,370
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2022, 05:41:41 PM »

I used to think not, but it's worth considering that Trump's movement has been one of the heartiest and most enduring in the party in decades, and that was before he even won the election. Events during her presidency would probably strengthen his appeal: COVID (no, the butterfly effect isn't some magic wand that can wave away the evolution of a virus halfway across the world because someone else is in the White House), deteriorating relations with China, societal upheaval (technological and outsourcing-based un(der)employment, climate change, sexual harassment, migration surges, police brutality, and the reinforcement of echo chambers by social media can't be handwaved away either), and the economic disruption inherent to those things. I also used to think he wouldn't want to run again after losing, but all signs point to a Trump run in our 2024.

However, someone else might have a shot at taking Trump's place by 2020, probably either DeSantis or Josh Hawley.
Neither DeSantis nor Josh Hawley are going to run in 2020, both being first elected in 2018.

Even Obama needed four years as a senator before running for President

I expect the Republican nominee, if not Trump, would be Cruz. He is runner up and would probably copy a lot of Trump's populist rethoic
Logged
TwinGeeks99
Rookie
**
Posts: 207
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2022, 09:06:46 PM »

Absolutely not, because even before Trump won the Republican Party was ready to leave him for dead if he lost.
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,862
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2022, 07:17:01 AM »

I don’t think so. Trump was nowhere near as popular in 2016 as he was in 2020. He won over a lot of those conservative skeptics over the course of his presidency.
Logged
El muerdago es mortal si te lo comes
MormDem
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,910
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2022, 11:37:54 PM »

I used to think not, but it's worth considering that Trump's movement has been one of the heartiest and most enduring in the party in decades, and that was before he even won the election. Events during her presidency would probably strengthen his appeal: COVID (no, the butterfly effect isn't some magic wand that can wave away the evolution of a virus halfway across the world because someone else is in the White House), deteriorating relations with China, societal upheaval (technological and outsourcing-based un(der)employment, climate change, sexual harassment, migration surges, police brutality, and the reinforcement of echo chambers by social media can't be handwaved away either), and the economic disruption inherent to those things. I also used to think he wouldn't want to run again after losing, but all signs point to a Trump run in our 2024.

However, someone else might have a shot at taking Trump's place by 2020, probably either DeSantis or Josh Hawley.
Neither DeSantis nor Josh Hawley are going to run in 2020, both being first elected in 2018.

Even Obama needed four years as a senator before running for President

I expect the Republican nominee, if not Trump, would be Cruz. He is runner up and would probably copy a lot of Trump's populist rethoic
.   Don't underestimate Rick Scott here.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 51,687


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2022, 11:32:41 PM »

Yes. If not for the Comey letter Clinton would probably have been able to barely hang onto the Midwest and won a 1960-esque nailbiter. She would have had approval ratings on the 20s and 30s throughout her term as she would have still been despised by the Bernie crowd. Backlash against Covid restrictions would have been a thousand times worse since the GOP would have a common enemy to unite against.

The better than expected showing by Trump causes the party bosses to warm up to him in 2020 and he would have an interest in running again to get his ego stroked by his big crowds of adoring admirers. There would be some resistance to his renomination but not nearly enough to stop him from getting the nod. Trump would retain his outsider appeal while Hillary would be fatally damaged by four years of nonstop GOP investigations.

Her approval ratings would have gone up temporarily due to Covid but again with a common enemy the GOP would have given her the same treatment Gretchen Whitmer got IRL. Eventually as the pandemic raged on with no end in sight Trump would have campaigned on ending the lockdowns and independents would rationalize voting for him "because he'll handle Covid the same way he runs his businesses!"

Hillary would then lose the 2016 map give or take New Hampshire or Virginia and we'd have a Trump presidency with him four years further into dementia land.

Hot take: due to the butterfly effect, there wouldn't have been a pandemic under her.

Don't get me wrong, she still would have been an unpopular lame duck regardless though.

The bolded part is correct. Trump is the one who disbanded the pandemic preparedness team. Had Hillary been President, it would never have left China.

LOL.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 14 queries.