Remember when Tucker Carlson defended a teacher who gave a lap dance to her 15-year-old student?

[OSR stands with Israel]

LMAO at my post being reported for "lgbt discrimination".

yes, calling all LGBT people pedophiles is like textbook bigotry/discrimination lmao

i called liberals and lgbt people groomers. Yall just made threads about republicans being groomers yet you cry like a child when you are called one. Btch sht

I made a thread about a specific person, you're painting a broad brush about an entire group of people.

For instance, if you (DeadPrez) called Milo Yiannopoulos a groomer, nobody would be mad since he's expressed similar views to Carlson here. But, you instead chose to paint over 10-20 million Americans with one negative brush. Let me try the same thing:

"All Republicans are fascists"

Feel like that should stand now?

Deadprez absolutely should not have said that but we have multiple  red avatars who have called anyone who is a Republican a terrorist enabler and a traitor and they have never been punished .

This has created an environment where right wingers are trying to use equally charged buzzword to get back at posters on the other side here .

[OSR stands with Israel]

LMAO at my post being reported for "lgbt discrimination".

yes, calling all LGBT people pedophiles is like textbook bigotry/discrimination lmao

i called liberals and lgbt people groomers. Yall just made threads about republicans being groomers yet you cry like a child when you are called one. Btch sht

I made a thread about a specific person, you're painting a broad brush about an entire group of people.

For instance, if you (DeadPrez) called Milo Yiannopoulos a groomer, nobody would be mad since he's expressed similar views to Carlson here. But, you instead chose to paint over 10-20 million Americans with one negative brush. Let me try the same thing:

"All Republicans are fascists"

Feel like that should stand now?

Deadprez absolutely should not have said that but we have multiple  red avatars who have called anyone who is a Republican a terrorist enabler and a traitor and they have never been punished .

This has created an environment where right wingers are trying to use equally charged buzzword to get back at posters on the other side here .

Even you are capable of understanding the difference between “people who disagree with me are fascists” and “all gay people are pedophiles”

Neither should be allowed plain and simple and the Terrorist one is what I have a bigger problem with . Being a terrorist is the worst possible crime and you have so many many red avatars accuse the other side of being that .


Anyway I had a post deleted for calling Ghost of Ruin a fascist

[OSR stands with Israel]

Neither should be allowed plain and simple and the Terrorist one is what I have a bigger problem with . Being a terrorist is the worst possible crime and you have so many many red avatars accuse the other side of being that .

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine. But accusing someone of being a pedophile is worse than accusing them of being a terrorist.

Neither should be allowed plain and simple but outright saying terrorism is worse than groomer as one is a dog whistle while one is outright accusing someone of a severe crime and the crime that carries the worst possible punishment

Regardless of what Deadprez says , this forum is gonna get far more heated and the only way to stop it is if the mods put a stop to all of this

[OSR stands with Israel]

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine.

I'm maybe in the minority but I'm not 100% okay with this. People should be able to accurately or semi-accurately describe people using adjectives and labels on this forum. If somebody is a Republican and you call them a fascist, that might be a little too far, but if they're a Republican cheering on people who want to overturn democratic election results, calling them a fascist should absolutely be allowed because that's an accurate description. I would prefer if the moderators of this forum refrain from turning it into a safe space for anti-democracy insurrectionists.

When and if Schumer, Newsom and Tlaib start advocating for overturning election results, it should also be okay to call the red avatars that cheer them on fascists as well.

Ok fascist

[OSR stands with Israel]

Neither should be allowed plain and simple and the Terrorist one is what I have a bigger problem with . Being a terrorist is the worst possible crime and you have so many many red avatars accuse the other side of being that .

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine. But accusing someone of being a pedophile is worse than accusing them of being a terrorist.

Neither should be allowed plain and simple but outright saying terrorism is worse than groomer as one is a dog whistle while one is outright accusing someone of a severe crime and the crime that carries the worst possible punishment

Regardless of what Deadprez says , this forum is gonna get far more heated and the only way to stop it is if the mods put a stop to all of this

I would much rather be accused of being a terrorist than be accused of being a pedophile

He didn’t say that , he just used a word he saw on Twitter to trigger people. I don’t think he should have and think he should apologize for it but this is what happens when USGD becomes as much of a dumpster fire as it has become.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Lmao they are making this about gay people when it literally wasn't. Yes, calling people you don't like a fascist is ok but when you call people you don't like another word you cry. If i said conservatives are groomers, my post would not have been deleted. The double standard is real

>"LGBTQ people are groomers"

>"This isn't about gay people"

Pick one.

why ignore the liberal part as if im singling out lgbt people.

You're dodging the question.

not dodging. Yall are singling them out like i made it about them

listen guys this is what needs to be done.

You should apologize for using the term groomer in such a massively broad fashion

and red avatars who use the term terrorist in a broad fashion should apologize.

[OSR stands with Israel]

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine.

I'm maybe in the minority but I'm not 100% okay with this. People should be able to accurately or semi-accurately describe people using adjectives and labels on this forum. If somebody is a Republican and you call them a fascist, that might be a little too far, but if they're a Republican cheering on people who want to overturn democratic election results, calling them a fascist should absolutely be allowed because that's an accurate description. I would prefer if the moderators of this forum refrain from turning it into a safe space for anti-democracy insurrectionists.

When and if Schumer, Newsom and Tlaib start advocating for overturning election results, it should also be okay to call the red avatars that cheer them on fascists as well.

Ok fascist

Trolling doesn't suit you very well.

Its not trolling to say people who believe that tens of millions of people who support a different party then them are fascists. Saying you can't vote for the main opposition party without being a terrorist or a traitor is authoritarianism 101 and these people cannot seriously claim they care about democracy.

[OSR stands with Israel]

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine.

I'm maybe in the minority but I'm not 100% okay with this. People should be able to accurately or semi-accurately describe people using adjectives and labels on this forum. If somebody is a Republican and you call them a fascist, that might be a little too far, but if they're a Republican cheering on people who want to overturn democratic election results, calling them a fascist should absolutely be allowed because that's an accurate description. I would prefer if the moderators of this forum refrain from turning it into a safe space for anti-democracy insurrectionists.

When and if Schumer, Newsom and Tlaib start advocating for overturning election results, it should also be okay to call the red avatars that cheer them on fascists as well.

Ok fascist

Trolling doesn't suit you very well.

Its not trolling to say people who believe that tens of millions of people are terrorists are traitors cause they support a different party then them are indeed fascists . Saying you can't vote for the main opposition party without being a terrorist or a traitor is authoritarianism 101 and these people cannot seriously claim they care about democracy.

So supporting candidates who want to overturn democratic election results doesn't make you a fascist, but calling those supporters fascists does make you a fascist? WTF kind of logic is that?

I said if they called them terrorists or traitors though edited to make it more clear

[OSR stands with Israel]

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine.

I'm maybe in the minority but I'm not 100% okay with this. People should be able to accurately or semi-accurately describe people using adjectives and labels on this forum. If somebody is a Republican and you call them a fascist, that might be a little too far, but if they're a Republican cheering on people who want to overturn democratic election results, calling them a fascist should absolutely be allowed because that's an accurate description. I would prefer if the moderators of this forum refrain from turning it into a safe space for anti-democracy insurrectionists.

When and if Schumer, Newsom and Tlaib start advocating for overturning election results, it should also be okay to call the red avatars that cheer them on fascists as well.

Ok fascist

Trolling doesn't suit you very well.

Its not trolling to say people who believe that tens of millions of people are terrorists are traitors cause they support a different party then them are indeed fascists . Saying you can't vote for the main opposition party without being a terrorist or a traitor is authoritarianism 101 and these people cannot seriously claim they care about democracy.

So supporting candidates who want to overturn democratic election results doesn't make you a fascist, but calling those supporters fascists does make you a fascist? WTF kind of logic is that?

I said if they called them terrorists or traitors though edited to make it more clear

Okay, but when did T'Chenka say that all Republicans were terrorists?

He has said before it is fair to call anyone who votes Republican terrorist enablers before

[OSR stands with Israel]

Trolling doesn't suit you very well.

Its not trolling to say people who believe that tens of millions of people who support a different party then them are fascists. Saying you can't vote for the main opposition party without being a terrorist or a traitor is authoritarianism 101 and these people cannot seriously claim they care about democracy.

You just made a blanket statement statement implying that a political party being the main opposition party automatically means that that party isn't a terrorist or traitor party. I know that's probably not what you meant, but that's what you did.

So if I take your post that you just made, and apply it to some country who's main opposition party is literally the We Want To Commit Terrorism Party, or the Literally Anti-Democracy Party, you might be right that the voters for that party aren't terrorists or traitors necessarily / automatically, but they're most certainly pro-terrorism, anti-democracy, terrorism enablers and fascism-enablers.

Would you like to re-word your post to make more sense, or do you want to settle for just being right only on a technicality? Sometimes people do not add "enablers" or "supporters" to the words "terrorist" and "traitor" and therefore you're technically correct.

Actually those nations where that is true are literally not democracies.

[OSR stands with Israel]

Okay, but when did T'Chenka say that all Republicans were terrorists?

He has said before it is fair to call anyone who votes Republican terrorist enablers before

Depending on the voter, they are either terrorist-enablers OR the enablers of terrorist-enablers, yes. At least, modern 2021 / 2022 Republicans. I'm not speaking about Republicans from any era, I'm talking about the current version of the party.

I'm not making a partisan argument based on my feelings or political leanings, I'm making an argument based on the facts.

It is not based on facts at all. Someone voting for a party based on their support of their policy on taxes, abortion, education etc does not make them a terrorist enabler one bit. Also saying in a democracy that you can't vote for one of the two main parties is by definition authoritarian

[OSR stands with Israel]

Someone voting for a party based on their support of their policy on taxes, abortion, education etc does not make them a terrorist enabler one bit. 

Well, if you vote for the 2022 Republican Party based on your support of their policies on taxes, abortion, education, etc, but despite the fascist actions of some of the party's leadership (Trump especially and DeSantis to a smaller extent) and the party's unwillingness to denounce Trump and his terrorist insurrection and threats of further anti-democracy terrorist mob actions, then you are choosing to enable GOP congresspeople who are enabling fascist GOP leaders and enabling Trump who is willing to cause mob terrorism. You don't necessarily WANT that to happen, but you are willing to enable it as a tradeoff in order to get the policies you want, which you view overall as more important than not enabling fascist actions by several GOP lawmakers and mob violence by Trump.

Also saying in a democracy that you can't vote for one of the two main parties is by definition authoritarian

Nobody is saying you literally cannot vote for them. People are saying that voting for them is morally unacceptable when you factor in the implications of that vote.

Name any major politician who has been charged with terrorism or treason by the DOJ let alone convicted cause so far that has not happened. If you want to call people these things without being an authoritarian than at the very least cite the cases where these politicians have been charged with those crimes.

[OSR stands with Israel]

If you want to say neither should be allowed, fine.

I'm maybe in the minority but I'm not 100% okay with this. People should be able to accurately or semi-accurately describe people using adjectives and labels on this forum. If somebody is a Republican and you call them a fascist, that might be a little too far, but if they're a Republican cheering on people who want to overturn democratic election results, calling them a fascist should absolutely be allowed because that's an accurate description. I would prefer if the moderators of this forum refrain from turning it into a safe space for anti-democracy insurrectionists.

When and if Schumer, Newsom and Tlaib start advocating for overturning election results, it should also be okay to call the red avatars that cheer them on fascists as well.

Ok fascist

Trolling doesn't suit you very well.

Its not trolling to say people who believe that tens of millions of people who support a different party then them are fascists. Saying you can't vote for the main opposition party without being a terrorist or a traitor is authoritarianism 101 and these people cannot seriously claim they care about democracy.

A party that says election results it does not like are illegitimate, is fascist. A party that literally tries to install a dictator after he loses a fair, democratic elevation, is a fascist party. A party that has tried to make it harder to vote for people who are likely to vote against them - is a fascist party.

I’m objecting mainly to posters on here calling republicans terrorists or traitors cause both those are severe severe crimes that gets someone locked up for life in a supermax