Biological women are pre-wired to generally be more caring towards others since their job was to carry the baby and then in most societies they would be the most active caregiver towards the baby. Men on the other hand generally went out to hunt, and were far more exposed to competition with other men. They were also the protectors of their family or community.
"Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus killed us all" exhibit #463728
I do think this is stupid, but there is something to women being more left-wing/liberal and less right-wing/conservative than men in voting patterns across the developed democratic world, from Sweden to Taiwan.
That's true on the issues that are being debated today and from the position that women occupy in society today. We don't know how a 23rd century woman would vote on teleportation regulations.
Part of the shift is probably attributed to the proportion of women who preferred to work as little as possible after having kids. When deciding who to vote for, they would obviously have a huge incentive to keep their husband's income as high as possible. In the 1920's, this would have been a clear majority of American women, but it has since fallen to perhaps 10-20% at most.
So you get class based voting where husbands and wives generally pick the same side with the goal of keeping the family income as high as possible. Recently, with the decline in "housewives" and no equivalent rise in "househusbands" and with marriage after age 30 becoming increasingly common (meaning the average person will vote several times while still single), it's way more common for men and women to have diverging political interests now.