Atlasian Public Acts - Publication of the Game Engine

[Mr. Reactionary]

If we are voicing our opinions, Ill add that I also support scrapping the concept. I am unfamiliar with these legislative elections. I wasnt in the game during the brief period where these were done, but as it was explained to me last night, basically whoever posts the most amount of useless spam gets rewarded with improbable NPC results thus incentivizing useless spam. Using the results from 2 years ago make no apparent sense in light of the current in game situation.

Also there isnt anything in the federal or Regional constitutions requiring elected legislative governments. IIRC Scott mentioned that in Fremont the Regional government has assumed basically all State and local taxation, powers, and functions. As I read the constitution, Regions in game are to States, what States in real life are to counties i.e. sovereign to constituent subdivision. Hypothetically I dont see any reason why Regions couldnt just essentially abolish state and local governments within the region or say make such governments subject to appointment by the Regional government.

Im not going to knock anyone for trying new ideas just because they didnt work, im just going to say imo I dont think this works at all. Especially when it results in nonsensical outcomes that are still being treated as in effect 2 years later.

[Mr. Reactionary]

If we are voicing our opinions, Ill add that I also support scrapping the concept. I am unfamiliar with these legislative elections. I wasnt in the game during the brief period where these were done, but as it was explained to me last night, basically whoever posts the most amount of useless spam gets rewarded with improbable NPC results thus incentivizing useless spam. Using the results from 2 years ago make no apparent sense in light of the current in game situation.

Also there isnt anything in the federal or Regional constitutions requiring elected legislative governments. IIRC Scott mentioned that in Fremont the Regional government has assumed basically all State and local taxation, powers, and functions. As I read the constitution, Regions in game are to States, what States in real life are to counties i.e. sovereign to constituent subdivision. Hypothetically I dont see any reason why Regions couldnt just essentially abolish state and local governments within the region or say make such governments subject to appointment by the Regional government.

Im not going to knock anyone for trying new ideas just because they didnt work, im just going to say imo I dont think this works at all. Especially when it results in nonsensical outcomes that are still being treated as in effect 2 years later.

I'm not speaking for the entire team, but if the Senate were willing to repeal the act creating the state NPC elections AND declare all officeholders null and void, and all storylines covering said officeholders as non-valid, it would get no objection from me.

You wouldnt happen to know what the federal law is called/when it was passed do you? Im not finding it.

[Mr. Reactionary]

[Mr. Reactionary]

Reactionary be like:

[Mr. Reactionary]

Is this really what would have happened? Some of these stories stretch my suspension of disblief.

Why? Because you personally dont like the South?

[Mr. Reactionary]

Is this really what would have happened? Some of these stories stretch my suspension of disblief.

Same here. It's totally unrealistic and the foundations were not laid well at all. But the mods have spoken

Regardless of the personal beliefs of the GM team it would be unrealistic for people to vote against such a large stipend, snowmobiles, and housing. Whether current and future developments will cause a change in viewpoints will be seen.

You think it’s completely unrealistic for people to vote against becoming part of a completely separate country they have no cultural connection to and don’t even use the operative language of, simply because they are being offered snowmobiles?

It’s actually comical. This GM team’s idea of ‘realism’ is to unilaterally declare that Ukrainians are Nazis and Greenlanders are dying to be colonized by Atlasia. One year ago, a proposed deal involving Taiwan was considered so unrealistic that we created emergency powers to reverse those edicts (powers which, since then, have already been flagrantly abused for the sake of convenience). But we’re supposed to be okay with this?

For years, this game had Game Moderators who went to great lengths to ensure foreign policy in this game was a realistic, playable simulation. I don’t know why the current team insists on repeatedly spitting in the face of their legacy.

Sometimes, people do have different ideas of what is and isn’t realistic. The South did offer every material thing that Greenlanders are seeking according to many polls. Whether that alone is enough id it’s own debate, we chose one side but understand your skepticism. I will say…if something seems off and weird though…maybe there is a deeper reason for it as well.

Stay tuned.

It is funny to see the "as an unemployed leftwing liberal pro gressive, I of course would turn down $80K, a 20% annual raise, a free house and vehicle, and more autonomy than I currently have if it means drilling icky dirty oil by icky southerners who arent in Philcord" responses to this as though human nature and game theory havent been considered.

The offer is better for the vast majority of Greenlanders than the status quo or independence. Rational actors would choose the option if you dont view them through the racist lens of the "noble savage".

[Mr. Reactionary]

It is funny to see the "as an unemployed leftwing liberal pro gressive, I of course would turn down $80K, a 20% annual raise, a free house and vehicle, and more autonomy than I currently have if it means drilling icky dirty oil by icky southerners who arent in Philcord" responses to this as though human nature and game theory havent been considered.

The offer is better for the vast majority of Greenlanders than the status quo or independence. Rational actors would choose the option if you dont view them through the racist lens of the "noble savage".

This is stupid. We are to believe that rational actors would choose to forgo all rights of self-determination and put themselves entirely at the mercy of a successor state to the country that has, over three centuries, made countless such promises to native populations to this continent and reneged on nearly all of them?

More to the point, it looks like the game moderation team along with certain members of the government have made the decision to revive Manifest Destiny was initiated and completed within one month with essentially no discussion. I’m aware that this game is run entirely on discord now, but I would think this kind of massive change would warrant at least one thread. But I guess Maoist shadow government is the best we can hope for these days.

Half their income is a subsidy from the Danish government. Half. If they go independent they lose all of that and are 50% poorer. We made them way richer and gave them the same autonomy. This is literally better than the status quo; they get $80K, a 20% raise, and a house and vehicle. And it is better than independence in that, again, they get a raise rather than a 50% cut. They get the best of both worlds literally upfront. They get autonomy without sacrificing money and the money was paid, up front. No waiting period. We even funded their annual subsidy 5 years in advance into a trust fund. They dont have to worry about securing finance. They dont have to worry about funding infrastructure. They get literally what the polls say they want.

But yes, muh pro gressive derping about muhnifest destiny noble savage white guilt is going convince rational humans to voluntarily be poor by name calling the GMs. The people voted and want the free money with no strings. Most people rationally would. Independence only benefits them if they drill themselves, secure financing and infrastructure themselves, and all abandon their culture and get jobs to support the 50% cut to their income.

[Mr. Reactionary]

It is funny to see the "as an unemployed leftwing liberal pro gressive, I of course would turn down $80K, a 20% annual raise, a free house and vehicle, and more autonomy than I currently have if it means drilling icky dirty oil by icky southerners who arent in Philcord" responses to this as though human nature and game theory havent been considered.

The offer is better for the vast majority of Greenlanders than the status quo or independence. Rational actors would choose the option if you dont view them through the racist lens of the "noble savage".

This is stupid. We are to believe that rational actors would choose to forgo all rights of self-determination and put themselves entirely at the mercy of a successor state to the country that has, over three centuries, made countless such promises to native populations to this continent and reneged on nearly all of them?

More to the point, it looks like the game moderation team along with certain members of the government have made the decision to revive Manifest Destiny was initiated and completed within one month with essentially no discussion. I’m aware that this game is run entirely on discord now, but I would think this kind of massive change would warrant at least one thread. But I guess Maoist shadow government is the best we can hope for these days.

Half their income is a subsidy from the Danish government. Half. If they go independent they lose all of that and are 50% poorer. We made them way richer and gave them the same autonomy. This is literally better than the status quo; they get $80K, a 20% raise, and a house and vehicle. And it is better than independence in that, again, they get a raise rather than a 50% cut. They get the best of both worlds literally upfront. They get autonomy without sacrificing money and the money was paid, up front. No waiting period. We even funded their annual subsidy 5 years in advance into a trust fund. They dont have to worry about securing finance. They dont have to worry about funding infrastructure. They get literally what the polls say they want.

But yes, muh pro gressive derping about muhnifest destiny noble savage white guilt is going convince rational humans to voluntarily be poor by name calling the GMs. The people voted and want the free money with no strings. Most people rationally would. Independence only benefits them if they drill themselves, secure financing and infrastructure themselves, and all abandon their culture and get jobs to support the 50% cut to their income.

You make arguments that sound like this for every single policy. "Just because I support this means that all rational people must also support it". We are to believe that every single policy you support also enjoys comfortable majority support?

But anyway, whatever. If you all want to keep running this game into the ground you are free to proceed as you please. Kind of astonishing how much you've managed to destroy in the last eight months.

Such an objective supreme court justice.

[Mr. Reactionary]

Such an objective supreme court justice.

Fairly sure I'm still allowed to have opinions on the state of the game. When have I ever said anything about any legal issues? It's not like I'm arguing any legislative policy or anything here.

The game now has gone to sh**t. I don't think literally anyone would dispute that. And it's the cumulative fault of almost everyone involved.

How so?

Well he said it started 8 months ago, so it wasnt all the bad behavior leading up to and during the Kansas crap. That also means it wasnt the 3 year period during which only 1 party ran everything and made it not fun for literally everyone not in that party. Hmmm ... the only difference would be that Labor is not running the game. Curious.