Opinion of the above poster

[TheReckoning]

titanium FF

[Progressive Pessimist]

Not the worst blue avatar but has their moments when they can really be grating.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Pretty cool.

[Dani Rose]

I really like and agree with what I've seen from you so far!

[Joe Republic]

So far so good

[Fuzzy Bear]

An unchecked Forum bully.

[President Punxsutawney Phil]

FF

[Ferguson97]

The “both sides” centrism shtick is unbearable.

[Joe Republic]

By and large one of the best around here, honestly.  He has the tenacity to stand the same ground I would that I often don't have the spare time to match these days.

An unchecked Forum bully.

If having no patience or tact with disgusting bigots and tedious blowhards makes me a bully, I guess I'll wear that as a badge of honor.

Besides, "unchecked" implies I have few infractions or deleted posts.  The facts say otherwise, but when has that ever stood in your way before?

[John Dule]

We disagree on plenty, but I've never doubted his intelligence or his ability to convert his thoughts into the written word. This alone puts him in the top 25% of users on this site.

[Fuzzy Bear]

An HP in the truest sense of the word.

Ferguson97 recently launched an attack beyond the pale on me for which he was inadequately sanctions, but he was sanctioned at least.  Afterward, the above poster posted that my vigorous objections to both his post and his rather light sanction was somehow proof that Ferguson97 was "accurate to some degree".

He's not, of course; everything Ferguson97 said was both baseless and libelous, yet Dule chose to do this.  This reflects a degree of basic inhumanity.  (Ferguson97, who is currently muted only on USGD, recommended a post giving credibility to a personal attack he made that he was sanctioned for; this is one reason I find his sanctions inadequate.) 

The above poster, essentially, voiced the idea that there was some degree of accuracy in Ferguson97 saying that I (A) caused my granddaughter to "go back in the closet" and (B) desired to become a guard at a trans interment camp.  What SHOULD I think if he actually believes this?  Furthermore, what SHOULD I think if this is what he thinks, and if this is what he feels free to post?

I know he realizes what he posted.  I doubt he realizes what he DID, and if he does and is OK with that, it's an even worse statement his actions are making about himself.  Until that post I viewed him as a guy who I disagreed with and didn't fully understand his take, but I could like his creativity.  Not now.  He's one of the worst PEOPLE here.  I like to think he has the capability to reflect and change, but he'll have to show me.  What he did in his recent post was one of the lowest blows ever dealt on this Forum.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

HP. And turning this thread into a place to rant about petty grievances is bad.

[soundchaser]

An FF for the above opinion alone (but also their other posts are solid).

[Ferguson97]

[snip]

Instead of actually giving your opinion on John Dule, you just use this as an opportunity to publish another manifesto about how much you despise me?

This obsession is getting out of hand.

[John Dule]

An HP in the truest sense of the word.

Ferguson97 recently launched an attack beyond the pale on me for which he was inadequately sanctions, but he was sanctioned at least.  Afterward, the above poster posted that my vigorous objections to both his post and his rather light sanction was somehow proof that Ferguson97 was "accurate to some degree".

He's not, of course; everything Ferguson97 said was both baseless and libelous, yet Dule chose to do this.  This reflects a degree of basic inhumanity.  (Ferguson97, who is currently muted only on USGD, recommended a post giving credibility to a personal attack he made that he was sanctioned for; this is one reason I find his sanctions inadequate.) 

The above poster, essentially, voiced the idea that there was some degree of accuracy in Ferguson97 saying that I (A) caused my granddaughter to "go back in the closet" and (B) desired to become a guard at a trans interment camp.  What SHOULD I think if he actually believes this?  Furthermore, what SHOULD I think if this is what he thinks, and if this is what he feels free to post?

I know he realizes what he posted.  I doubt he realizes what he DID, and if he does and is OK with that, it's an even worse statement his actions are making about himself.  Until that post I viewed him as a guy who I disagreed with and didn't fully understand his take, but I could like his creativity.  Not now.  He's one of the worst PEOPLE here.  I like to think he has the capability to reflect and change, but he'll have to show me.  What he did in his recent post was one of the lowest blows ever dealt on this Forum.

My mistake; clearly what he said didn't strike a chord with you at all. That's why you felt the need to devote four more paragraphs to the subject.

[soundchaser]

In any case, John Dule is a pretty fun poster.

[Since I'm the mad scientist proclaimed by myself]

Don't know them all that well, but they seem great from what I've seen.

[Enduro]

They alright

[West_Midlander]

FF

[Fuzzy Bear]

Massive FF

[TDAS04]

Neutral

[Goldwater]

A friendly familiar face

[Xing]

A definite FF.

[John Dule]

One of our best.

[No War, but the War on Christmas]

Probably one of the biggest 'FF/HP' internal conflicts...

He's a hilarious HP with terrible views from my vantage point who I presume I would actually have a good time /w in a group with drinks and food, as long as politics wasn't brought up.