How were possible the results in Mississippi and South Carolina in 1936? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 04:25:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How were possible the results in Mississippi and South Carolina in 1936? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How were possible the results in Mississippi and South Carolina in 1936?  (Read 775 times)
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,232
United States


« on: August 10, 2022, 12:36:21 PM »

Voter suppression, especially of Black voters. Due to how racially polarized party support in the 'Solid South' was, these states were practically one-party states for the Dems due to it, all the way from the end of the Reconstruction era in the 19th century until Thurmond's candidacy in 1948.

Basically this. And IMHO even more crazy than 1936 is 1904 - TR won in a landslide, but in southern states (particularly MS/SC), the results were overwhelmingly (I'm talking 90%+) for Parker. In 1936, FDR still won in a landslide. Parker lost in a landslide and still got ridiculous margins out of the deep south (and if you compare results in SC/MS to national results, you'll find the disparity was much bigger in 1904 than in 1936).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.