Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:45:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south?  (Read 1020 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,680
« on: August 09, 2022, 11:59:32 PM »

Sol is, as usual, correct here; among great American cities, the only one with a location as strange as Atlanta is Dallas. The cities on the fall line in Georgia are Augusta, Macon, and Columbus.

One disadvantage that the fall line cities that far south have is that the weather is presumably pestilential, which would explain why Piedmont cities like Atlanta and Birmingham would have become relatively more important once the railroads made them possible. That doesn't explain why Atlanta got so much bigger than Birmingham, though. Instinctively I'd expect the opposite.

I-35 seems to follow a natural "minimum precipitation to sustain a city without industrial irrigation" climate gradient.  I don't think Dallas (or Austin or San Antonio) is a coincidence.

Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,680
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2022, 10:23:43 PM »


This is true, but it basically didn't exist until after 1900 and wasn't a big deal nationally until the 1960's-70's oil boom.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.