Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 01:02:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why Atlanta became the mega metro in the south?  (Read 1002 times)
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« on: August 09, 2022, 04:59:56 PM »

Next to NYC, its location based on topography is as close to perfect as God can manage. And then it transcended and marginalized the "intolerant," allowing its wings to stretch and soar into an estimable world class city.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2022, 05:54:23 PM »

Posts here are missing the importance of the fall line on the eastern seaboard. Cheap energy on a linear NE to SW line marked the economically productive belt. Atlanta did have set back when my great grandfather helped burn it to the ground.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2022, 07:43:03 AM »

Because it's a key transportation hub.

Started as the 'Terminus' (right in the city's original name) of the Western and Atlantic Railroad, and continued to expand due to Hartsfield-Jackson, which has historically been the world's largest airline hub.
Interesting. But I guess during the time when railroad was important, there should be many other cities serving as hubs? Why ATL was the most important one?

I know ATL is one of the largest airline hub since it was the base of Delta, but that should be after ATL became a mega metro?

It had the geographic advantage. It was where the north-south railroads going from NY southwards terminated or 'turned' East-West around the Appalachians into the southern interior. Before the civil war it was a major rail hub, but this location ensured the city would rise from the ashes and become an even bigger rail hub after industry came southwards.

This post implies though that Atlanta specifically is an obvious place for a city, as opposed to a historically lucky place at the junction and termini of rail lines. The Appalachians, although they made building railroads difficult, did not make them impossible.

In fact, the most obviously convenient link between the large NE port cities and the south is through the Cumberland Gap, and yet Knoxville never became a great American city.

Atlanta in fact has a somewhat crummy location; it's not along a major river (the Chattahoochee goes a good bit to the north and west) and unlike most major cities in the region it's not on the fall line either. It's only the magic of railroads and their erasure of distance that overcame that and made Atlanta a major city. It could just as easily have been Birmingham or Augusta or Athens or Macon, etc.

As late as 1950, the greater Atlanta area only has ~110,000 people on greater Birmingham.

Apparently the issue was a rail line to the Midwest, not the NE.

https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Atlanta-where-it-is
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.