How would the judge for a hypothetical Trump trial be chosen? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:09:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  How would the judge for a hypothetical Trump trial be chosen? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How would the judge for a hypothetical Trump trial be chosen?  (Read 634 times)
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
« on: August 09, 2022, 05:31:09 PM »
« edited: August 09, 2022, 05:43:10 PM by Donerail »

No, they would likely not be required to recuse themselves. The standard is 28 USC § 455(a), which requires a judge to recuse himself in "any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." It is binding precedent in the District of D.C. that "[h]earing a case involving the conduct of the President who appointed [the judge] will not create in reasonable minds, reasonable inquiry would disclose, a perception that [the judge's] ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality, and competence would be impaired." In re Executive Office of the President, 215 F.3d 25, 25 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

In general, there is a strong presumption that judges act impartially, "separate themselves from politics when going on the bench," and do not have a meaningful relationship with their appointing president (because they are insulated by life tenure). See MacDraw, Inc. v. CIT Grp. Equip. Fin., Inc., 138 F.3d 33, 38 (2d Cir. 1998). The District of D.C. has denied a recusal motion made on the basis of a hostile relationship between the litigant and the judge's appointing President, Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., 744 F. Supp. 2d 264, 277 (D.D.C. 2010), as well as one in a case against the Chief Justice where the district judge was appointed by the Chief Justice to a specialized court. Reddy v. O'Connor, 520 F. SUpp. 2d 124, 128 (D.D.C. 2007).

Obviously there would be unique concerns in the context of a criminal action against a former President, but the case law is pretty strong here in concluding that recusal is not required, even when the appointing President is involved in the case. For what it's worth, my impression is that all of the Trump appointees on the District of D.C. take their responsibilities seriously and would do their best to preside over the trial fairly — these people are not hacks.

If a federal prosecutor is reading this board I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, please obtain your own counsel and do your own research before deciding whether to move to recuse a judge in this hypothetical case.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 13 queries.