GOP congressional candidate claims "there are no pronouns in the Constitution or the Bible"

[Ferguson97]

https://twitter.com/lavern_spicer/status/1552008907454914561

Preamble to the Constitution

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union...

Genesis 1:4

God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.

[Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom]

Was this the one that posted the Hunter v. Don Jr 2028 poll and then got mad when Hunter Biden won?

[ProgressiveModerate]

Tbf she is a sacrificial lamb and just form her ads doenst seem like the most stable of people. She kinda has permission to just say whatever she wants.

[longtimelurker]

https://twitter.com/lavern_spicer/status/1552008907454914561

Preamble to the Constitution

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union...

Genesis 1:4

God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness.

From her own web page:

My whole life, I have been trying to help my community. It’s been twenty years of running my food bank and I still see the same people there, begging for help, twenty years later. I’m going to Congress because someone has to help these people out… and I’m going to be the one to do it!

https://www.spicerforcongress.com/

[Joe Republic]

They are running in a D+28 district.  Sacrificial lamb candidates are often whackjobs.

[Anti Democrat Democrat Club]

Not concerned about what some sentient brainlet wojak says.

[T'Chenka]

Kind of woke for him to suggest that Yahweh is non-binary.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

Not only is there no bottom for Republicans, but they are in a constant competition with themselves to plumb new depths of both evil and stupidity.,

[Person Man]

Not only is there no bottom for Republicans, but they are in a constant competition with themselves to plumb new depths of both evil and stupidity.,

It’s like the space race in violence, ignorance,  and degeneracy.

[Sir Mohamed]

She must have gotten her diploma from Trump University.

[Mercenary]

Whats the point of "sacrificial" candidates anyway? To pretend people have a choice in voting instead of it being single party rule in some places? Why even bother wasting the time/money?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

A well proven notorious troll just posted an absurd statement two posts above me. No doubt almost everyone disagrees and someone might try to "refute" him.

If you do so you're really just as bad as him. Please just ignore this 100% worthless and regularly tempbanned and muted sh!tposter.

[Del Tachi]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

[Del Tachi]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

And where did she specifically state that's what she's referring to? Because almost everyone is going to read those statements defining "pronouns" exactly as they were defined in 18th century English.

[💥💥 brandon bro (he/him/his)]

Both the Bible and the Constitution are missing land acknowledgements, though.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Both the Bible and the Constitution are missing land acknowledgements, though.

I suppose Nehemiah 9:8 arguably qualifies.

[Del Tachi]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

And where did she specifically state that's what she's referring to? Because almost everyone is going to read those statements defining "pronouns" exactly as they were defined in 18th century English.

Since when do people have to explicitly state which definition of a word they are using?  That would make our language so cumbersome as to actually impede communication, LOL

I don't think it's impossible to understand what she means given the context.  15.4k people who liked the Tweet supposedly got it.  The red avatar mafia is showing up here with a motivated interpretation of her words, as always.   

[Badger]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

And where did she specifically state that's what she's referring to? Because almost everyone is going to read those statements defining "pronouns" exactly as they were defined in 18th century English.

Since when do people have to explicitly state which definition of a word they are using?  That would make our language so cumbersome as to actually impede communication, LOL

I don't think it's impossible to understand what she means given the context.  15.4k people who liked the Tweet supposedly got it.  The red avatar mafia is showing up here with a motivated interpretation of her words, as always.   

No matter how absurd, bizarre, or even downright hateful a comment some Republican publicly makes, DT is always there to defend them no questions asked.

[GeorgiaModerate]

They are running in a D+28 district.  Sacrificial lamb candidates are often whackjobs.

I think that even some Biden +30 districts could flip this year defending on how big the Republican wave turns out to be.

I can't decide whether this is a better fit for the Absurd Post thread or the Hilarity thread.

[Del Tachi]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

And where did she specifically state that's what she's referring to? Because almost everyone is going to read those statements defining "pronouns" exactly as they were defined in 18th century English.

Since when do people have to explicitly state which definition of a word they are using?  That would make our language so cumbersome as to actually impede communication, LOL

I don't think it's impossible to understand what she means given the context.  15.4k people who liked the Tweet supposedly got it.  The red avatar mafia is showing up here with a motivated interpretation of her words, as always.   

No matter how absurd, bizarre, or even downright hateful a comment some Republican publicly makes, DT is always there to defend them no questions asked.

This Tweet is none of those things unless you have selective BadgerBrain^TM.  No questions asked. 

[Joe Republic]

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

For sure, like "well-regulated militia".

[Badger]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

And where did she specifically state that's what she's referring to? Because almost everyone is going to read those statements defining "pronouns" exactly as they were defined in 18th century English.

Since when do people have to explicitly state which definition of a word they are using?  That would make our language so cumbersome as to actually impede communication, LOL

I don't think it's impossible to understand what she means given the context.  15.4k people who liked the Tweet supposedly got it.  The red avatar mafia is showing up here with a motivated interpretation of her words, as always.   

No matter how absurd, bizarre, or even downright hateful a comment some Republican publicly makes, DT is always there to defend them no questions asked.

This Tweet is none of those things unless you have selective BadgerBrain^TM.  No questions asked. 

Maybe not hateful? I didn't read the rest of her thread to get her point, though I would lay even odds it's a swipe at trans people, in which case yes.

Absurd and bizarre though? Most certainly, and one merely has to have a Brain^TM to sus that out

[Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist]

The Bible nor the Constitution has "pronouns" in the sense that LGBTQ+ activists now employ the term.

That's not what she said. She said "There are no pronouns in the Constitution." and "There are no pronouns in the Bible."

And there now exists a distinct definition of "pronouns" that is used to mean chosen personal pronouns selected on the basis of someone's gender identity, which is a concept that would be completely alien in Early American or Biblical times.

Words can have multiple definitions that change over time, you know...

This is a particularly amazing sentence to read from the side that believes the term "woman" can only apply to people with a vagina and ovaries.