Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:48:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Oregon
 
#2
Nevada
 
#3
(Bonus option) New Mexico
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse?  (Read 880 times)
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,170
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 16, 2022, 07:57:08 PM »

Gotta go with Nevada myself.
Logged
bagelman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,624
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.17

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2022, 08:03:43 PM »

Before the elections, I'm going to say NV. NM will probably still keep the 2-1 split in an R environment, which defeats the purpose of the gerrymander but NV could conceivably be 4-0R.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,705


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2022, 08:07:42 PM »

At face value, Oregon's gerrymander is pretty solid, it just seems like Dems may be having a terrible year in Oregon. A Biden + 14 left-shifting seat in any remotely normal circumstances would not be competitive and even a 4D-2R delegation in an R leaning year is fine.

New Mexico's gerrymander is hard because no matter what the best you could do would be to perfectly balance all 3 seats in terms of partisanship which may violate VRA.

Nevada Dems really took a gamble and it'll depend upon how Las Vegas continues to shift over the course of a decade.
Logged
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,992


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2022, 08:54:50 PM »

Objectively Nevada. NM was not smart but it was not terrible like NV. Oregon’s gerrymander is solid, its just a very bad year for Ds, ESPECIALLY in Oregon.
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2022, 08:59:37 PM »

Nevada is just ridiculous. It's not hard to drag one of those districts up to Reno and make them all safer.
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,170
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2022, 09:19:53 PM »

Nevada is just ridiculous. It's not hard to drag one of those districts up to Reno and make them all safer.
The votes for that don't exist in the state legislature. But they easily could have made 1 competitive Vegas district and two Titanium D districts. Instead they made 3 competitive districts, and you can easily end up with a 4R-0D delegation.
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,987
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 16, 2022, 09:56:40 PM »

https://davesredistricting.org/maps#viewmap::7e64dbfa-5090-491d-998a-95283a1cc106

The Dems could have done this
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 16, 2022, 10:05:14 PM »

Nevada is just bizarre on so many levels. Ordinarily one of the most common causes for redistricting mistakes (from a partisan topline perspective) come from longtime incumbents making unreasonable demands that hurt the party overall. A state party actively screwing over their own decade-long incumbent is kind of ridiculous.
Logged
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,521
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 16, 2022, 10:16:47 PM »

The word "dummymander" has been reduced to meaning absolutely nothing now, I guess, considering it's even being used before any election has even happened.

Regardless, I think Nevada's map is the strangest from a strategic, incumbent-satisfaction, and minority/community interest viewpoint. Could still hold solid for Democrats, though, considering the absolute horror show that were Republican primaries in 2022.
Logged
Aurelius
Cody
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,170
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.35

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 16, 2022, 10:53:36 PM »

Doesn't have to be ugly either. https://davesredistricting.org/join/af0e254f-726f-4b52-98d5-eae92b327264
Logged
Hope For A New Era
EastOfEden
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,729


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 16, 2022, 11:17:53 PM »


woah

Never even occurred to me that that would be possible. It makes perfect sense now that I actually pay attention to the county populations though, all of them in your first district are tiny except Elko.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2022, 12:05:45 AM »

No real evidence yet any of these are dummymanders.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.224 seconds with 15 queries.