Soviet Survival: An Alternative 21st Century
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 12:09:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Soviet Survival: An Alternative 21st Century
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Soviet Survival: An Alternative 21st Century  (Read 4871 times)
Huey Long is a Republican
New Tennessean Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,508
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2023, 11:49:28 AM »

I wonder if this TL will see calls for Cuban statehood, like we saw some (minor) calls for Iraq to become the 51st state during the Iraq war.



Source : https://en.meming.world/wiki/The_What%3F
Logged
hurricanehink
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 610
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: January 09, 2023, 11:59:03 AM »

I wonder if this TL will see calls for Cuban statehood, like we saw some (minor) calls for Iraq to become the 51st state during the Iraq war.



Source : https://en.meming.world/wiki/The_What%3F

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/51st_state#Iraq
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2023, 08:56:00 PM »
« Edited: November 07, 2023, 04:09:32 PM by paxamericana »

Third Red Scare

The Republican-controlled House's M19 Committee launch an aggressive campaign against any and all groups with socialist ties within the US. The former members of Weather Underground, the far-left group which M19CO stemmed off from, became the primary targets as many of them found jobs within the university system after their activist days.

Leaders within the now defunct socialist parties-- including Communist Party USA, Socialist Alternative and the Party for Socialism and Liberation were also placed under investigation. Connections between the domestic terrorists who were arrested for May 19th and these parties were drawn, as it was found that there were many party members who were aware of the plans.

Sam Webb, the former chair of the Communist Party USA, testified before the committee in January of 2002. Webb condemned the attacks and insisted that neither he or anyone in his party had any knowledge of them. Several other Communist Party USA leaders appeared before the committee and none of them were found to be involved in the May 19th attacks. However, several espionage charges were leveled against them and their cooperation with the Cuban government was thoroughly examined. Several party members were charged, but none of the charges were related to May 19.

The public was greatly affected by this new red scare. Universities saw a decrease in enrolment, especially in southern states as older Americans feared that professors would turn their sons or daughters into radicals. The education system began to emphasize patriotism in an attempt to distance themselves from that stereotype. Attacks against Latin Americans increased nationwide, as the public became fearful of another terrorist act.  

2002 Midterms



With the attacks of May 19th still fresh in the mind of many voters, the GOP was able to have the best midterm performance for an incumbent party in several decades. Newt Gingrich's house majority increased by 10 seats while the GOP's senate majority increased by 3. Democrats nationwide struggle to run on a consistent platform, as many Americans approved of congressional investigations into far left socialists.

Yelstin's Resignation

As the Soviet Union prepared to enter 2003, Yeltsin's health was in just as bad of a shape as the nation's economy. Russia struggled to adapt to the rapid economic liberalization reforms of Yelstin's government. A massive financial crisis ensued, leading public opinion of Yeltsin to quickly sour. Meanwhile, Yeltsin's struggles with alcoholism worsened. All of these factors led to Yelstin resigning as General Secretary in February of 2003.

The "New" Cold War


"The American Imperialists have declared a global war against communism. Though we have not yet seen fighting on our soil, we must make no mistake that we are on the front lines of this great global conflict," Gennady Zyuganov addressing the Politburo (March 12, 2003)

Yelstin's fall from grace brought Communist hardliner Gennady Zyuganov into power. Zyuganov had opposed Yelstin's liberalization efforts, most especially his efforts to maintain friendly relations with the west. As American began its war against Cuba, Zyuganov was vocal in his support of Castro's regime. He believed that the Soviets should aid Cuba in their war. However, Yelstin dismissed the idea. Now that he assumed power, Zyuganov sought to immediately discontinue all efforts of establishing friendly relations with western powers.

Zyuganov's antagonistic rhetoric towards the US revived Cold War tensions significantly. The now far more hawkish American public was quick to vilify the Soviets. Some even believed that perhaps the Soviets orchestrated the May 19th attacks.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,330
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: January 18, 2023, 12:21:40 AM »

Great writing, even though ITTL America sounds like a horrible place to live compared to OTL.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: January 24, 2023, 01:23:30 PM »

Crisis in Venezuela

"The west is attempting to usurp the will of the people of Venezeula. I am left with no other choice than to suspend congress and restore order," President Hugo Chavez implementing martial law after losing the 2003 Recall Election (May 02, 2003)


In late 2002, enough signatures were gathered in Venezeula to hold a recall election against its current socialist leader, Hugo Chavez. Chavez had implemented a series of socialist reforms within his country since he gained the office in 2000. His self-proclaimed "Socialism of the 21st Century" merged elements of capitalism and socialism while at the same time, promoting democracy. Despite this, corruption and censorship grew under his regime.

Chavez allowed the recall election to proceed, believing that his ideas were broadly popular within his country. However, come election night, he lost the recall by a narrow margin. The day after the election, Chavez refused to concede defeat and made claims of widespread voter fraud and foreign interference. He suspended congress and granted himself emergency powers to stay in office. Western powers swiftly condemned the move.

Having been the most prominent socialist leader in Latin America, Chavez had been on the Rumsfeld administration's radar for years. Neoconservative influencers had lobbied for an invasion of Venezuela since the May 19th attacks, believing his nation's influence was a main pillar of socialism within South America. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and Vice President Jeane Kirkpatrick lobbied the hardest for an invasion, and jumped at the opportunity. An argument was quickly crafted: Chavez denied the will of the people, America should use its rightful role as defenders of democracy within the region to force him to accept the results of the election. The international community agreed that something must be done, but the idea of an invasion was highly controversial.

Wikimedia Commons

"The tyranny Hugo Chavez has displayed is a threat to not just the people of Venezuela, but to the entire free world. We have a responsibility and an obligation to liberate them," Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney speaking at a fundraiser in Ohio (May 08, 2003) 

"Congress must act quickly to stop an illegitimate dictator from retaining power," Vice President Jeane Kirkpatrick (May 09, 2003)

Military action was hotly debated within the United States. In Washington, there was a far greater consensus. A sizeable number of Democratic congressmen were quietly supportive of military action against Venezuela. When a vote came before the floor in late May of 2003 to authorize the use of military force, 25 Democrats voted in favor. When Rumsfeld signed the bill, the stage was set for another war.



The Anti-War Movement

Wikimedia Commons

"We have made significant progress in Venezuela, but our mission is not yet complete. Nicolas Maduro's insurgency movement, which has ties to MC19CO and other radical socialist organizations within Latin America, is a threat to the free world. It must be stopped at all costs," President Donald Rumsfeld speaking before military leaders (August 20, 2003)

The Rumsfeld Administration promised swift military action in Venezuela during the early days of the invasion. When Chavez was deposed less than a month after the invasion began, it looked like that promise would be upheld. Manuel Rosales became President of Venezuela in July, and Rumsfeld that the US's military presence would be completely gone by the end of the year. However, an insurgency movement led by Chavez's remaining allies was beginning to grow within the country. With insurgency attacks becoming more frequent, the timetable for a military exit began to be pushed further and further back.

Meanwhile at home, opposition to the war was growing. A majority still supported continuing military action-- most of whom were Republicans and older Democrats. Opponents to the war were mostly young progressives. As the war dragged on, these voices became louder and found limited mainstream support within the Democratic Party. Former President Ted Kennedy became a vocal opponent of the war, along with Governor Howard Dean. Others, like presidential hopeful John Kerry and Senator Al Gore, took a more moderate approach of calling for a troop decrease.

2004 Republican Primaries


Major Candidates

Vice President Jeane Kirkpatrick (R-OK)

Vice President Kirkpatrick was the presumed front runner as soon as she announced her presidential bid. With Rumsfeld's popularity within the Republican Party, it was presumed that she would be met with minimal opposition. Potential candidates such as Former Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Governor Jeb Bush immediately endorsed Kirkpatrick. Her campaign called for a continuation of Rumsfeld's policies, especially in the area of foreign policy. By the time Super Tuesday rolled around, Kirkpatrick had secured the nomination.

Senator John McCain (R-AZ)

The maverick senator became the first major candidate to oppose Kirkpatrick. He made a play for moderate Republicans who were turned off by the fiery rhetoric of Kirkpatrick. He advocated for a continuation of the war in Venezuela, but opposed spending cuts to Medicare and Social Security, and had moderate views on immigration. These moderate views became the main lines of attack for his opponents throughout the campaign. While McCain had better than expected performances in early primary states, he was unable to overcome Kirkpatrick.

Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

The conservative firebrand had made a name for himself throughout the Rumsfeld Presidency by being a stanch supporter of his foreign policy and his role in the M19 Committee. His announcement came as no surprise. While more unorthodox than Kirkpatrick, there was very little disagreement between the two. This difficulty to stand out from Kirkpatrick led to his campaign fizzling out.     

Mr. Pat Buchanan (R-VA)

Buchanan's third presidential campaign hit on the same populist themes as the first two. He was the main voice of opposition to Rumsfeld's foreign policy within the Republican Party and attracted a small but loyal following. However in a post May 19th national environment, he failed to gain popular support. After a disappointing showing in Iowa, Buchanan suspended his campaign.

2004 Democratic Primaries


Major Candidates

General Wesley Clark (D-AR)

The respected retired US Army General who served as Supreme Allied Commander Europe had been a public critic of the handling War in Venezuela. A group of Democrats began a draft movement in 2003, which was ultimately successful in convincing him to run. His moderate rhetoric attracted older Democrats who were weary of the growing progressive movement and his stance on Venezuela attracted younger voters. He was widely considered to be the most "electable" candidate in the field due to his military service. Critics said his policies lacked any real weight or substance, but he was ultimately able to secure the nomination. 

Senator John Kerry (D-MA)


Senator John Edwards (D-NC)
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,330
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: January 25, 2023, 07:38:27 PM »

How is progress on social issues? I assume gay marriage and abortion are at least twenty years back?
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,190
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: January 25, 2023, 08:00:05 PM »

This is a pretty fascinating timeline.

But how do you accommodate "The Blue Jean Theory," which is the theory that a significant reason behind the collapse of the USSR and Eastern Bloc was the widespread apathy of the youth towards the Communist establishment, as a result of their interest in Western music/fashion/culture?

The idea of a USSR lasting into the 21st century is interesting but I find it difficult to believe that the youth of the 1980s USSR would be as willing to continue the status quo as their parents, especially in the wake of the Internet becoming a force to be reckoned with.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,330
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: January 25, 2023, 09:29:00 PM »

You mentioned Ted Kennedy expanded Medicare and Medicaid, to what extent?
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2023, 11:50:11 AM »

How is progress on social issues? I assume gay marriage and abortion are at least twenty years back?

It will hopefully become more apparent in later updates, but Americans are a bit more socially conservative in this timeline.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2023, 11:54:19 AM »

This is a pretty fascinating timeline.

But how do you accommodate "The Blue Jean Theory," which is the theory that a significant reason behind the collapse of the USSR and Eastern Bloc was the widespread apathy of the youth towards the Communist establishment, as a result of their interest in Western music/fashion/culture?

The idea of a USSR lasting into the 21st century is interesting but I find it difficult to believe that the youth of the 1980s USSR would be as willing to continue the status quo as their parents, especially in the wake of the Internet becoming a force to be reckoned with.

What I attempted to convey earlier in the timeline is that the Soviets were able to crush any vocal social opposition. Glasnost never occurs and the internet is censored, so the flood gates are never opened so to speak.
Logged
LabourJersey
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,190
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: January 28, 2023, 12:47:06 PM »

This is a pretty fascinating timeline.

But how do you accommodate "The Blue Jean Theory," which is the theory that a significant reason behind the collapse of the USSR and Eastern Bloc was the widespread apathy of the youth towards the Communist establishment, as a result of their interest in Western music/fashion/culture?

The idea of a USSR lasting into the 21st century is interesting but I find it difficult to believe that the youth of the 1980s USSR would be as willing to continue the status quo as their parents, especially in the wake of the Internet becoming a force to be reckoned with.

What I attempted to convey earlier in the timeline is that the Soviets were able to crush any vocal social opposition. Glasnost never occurs and the internet is censored, so the flood gates are never opened so to speak.


Valid point, though I have read sources that implied that there was a lot of smuggled Western vinyls and music in the Eastenr Bloc even before Glasnost.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 28, 2023, 11:59:52 AM »

2004 Election

"Ask yourself: What would become of Cuba if the United States withdrew? Of Venezuela? What would become of Central America if these radical Marxists were allowed refuge? What then could the United States do? These are questions the Democrats have not answered. These are questions they haven't even asked."Vice President Jeane Kirkpatrick accepting the Republican Nomination (July 23, 2004)

"War. I've been there. And this soldier has news for you: Anyone who tells you that one political party has a monopoly on the best defense of our nation is committing a fraud on the American people. "General Welesy Clark accepting the Democratic Nomination (August 12, 2004)

Wikimedia Commons

Democrats were confident that they had fielded the perfect candidate in Wes Clark. In the first months of the campaign, he seemed to have minded the divide between pro and anti war factions within the party. His military status and calm rhetoric gave him a wide appeal- which Democrats' hoped would benefit them in a electoral landscape which favored Republicans.

However, cracks begin to form in Clark's campaign as he was asked more and more questions about the war. When pressed on whether he supported Rumsfeld's troops surge in Cuba, he gave an answer many found confusing and vague. Critics accused him of avoiding controversial topics. Liberals were quick to note how Clark avoided any mention of hot button social issues such as abortion and gay marriage-- two issues which Kirkpatrick frequently discussed on the campaign trail. These critics grew louder after the debates, where Clark's policy proposals seemed shallow to many voters.

In the end, though Clark overperformed expectations, he was unable to overcome Kirkpatrick. With gains in the Senate and minimal losses in the house, Republicans maintained their dominance over national politics.




Kirkpatrick Administration

"As we continue to march further into the 21st century, there are those among us who seek to redefine or in some cases even destroy American culture. These people tell us that America's values must change, that our government must expand and our military must shrink. Today-- we stand in opposition to the forces as we reaffirm that great nation's constitutional values, its belief in limited government and our strong military," President Jeane Kirkpatrick's Inaugural Address (January 20, 2005)

Very little policy change was expected going into Kirkpatrick's administration. For all intents and purposes, most believed they were getting a third Rumsfeld Administration. On the campaign trail, Kirkpatrick focused on foreign policy but did make one major domestic proposal: passing a federal ban on gay marriage. This effort manifested through the "Sanctity of Marriage Act." It passed easily, with the few Conservative Democrats left in congress also supporting it.

Within her first 100 days, Kirkpatrick had this act and a massive troop surge in Cuba and Venezuela under her belt. With these successes, it seemed Kirkpatrick was well positioned for a successful administration.

"An Unending Nightmare"

"I'm not really sure what our goal here is. We have no control in Venezuela, no control in Cuba. There's no stability on the ground, no clear motives. It's just an unending nightmare. I'm not sure how long we're going to keep this up," Secretary of Defense Peter Rodman in a leaked tape (June 29, 2005)

In June of 2005, The New York Times obtained a leaked conversation from Kirkpatrick's Secretary of Defense which went against her administration's narrative of success in Cuba and Venezuela. This came as public opinion on the wars, especially in Venezuela, soured. The next day, Rodman resigned from his post, but the damage had already been done.

A media frenzy began within hours of the conversation leaking. For days, it consumed the news cycle and Kirkpatrick could not escape questions about the tapes. Reporters would ask if she agreed with his observations, if the wars were indeed unwinnable. The White House's narrative was that Rodman was simply frustrated by the difficulties of the war, but that there were long term goals that would eventually be realized.

"It is critical that we do not abandon the brave freedom fighters in Venezuela. They are fighting the same fight which came right to our doorstep on that tragic day almost four years ago. We have experienced tremendous hardships and loss of life in this war, but the consequences of retreating are far greater," President Jeane Kirkpatrick during her first State of the Union Address (February 12, 2006).  

Public opinion soured on both the war and Kirkpatrick. Approval ratings hit below 45% by the end of the Summer of 2006.

2006 Midterm Elections

The growing unpopularity of Kirkpatrick, disapproval of the wars in Cuba and Venezuela and a stagnant economy led to massive gains for the Democrats. For the first time since 1992, the Democrats gained control of the House. In the Senate, the Democrats gained 6 seats.



After the midterms, Kirkpatrick's public appearances became sparse. Media speculation initially centered around the idea that she was avoiding further criticism of her administration. However-- grim rumors began to emerge about her declining health. Having just reached the age of 80, Kirkpatrick was one of the oldest presidents ever to hold the office. In 2004, her health was of little concern.

Once December of 2006 began, Kirkpatrick had not made a public appearance in over a month. Seven days later, it became all too clear why.

"BREAKING: PRESIDENT JEANE KIRKPATRICK DEAD AT 80" AP News (December 07, 2006)
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: May 24, 2023, 11:30:49 AM »

"My fellow Americans, tonight we mourn the loss of one of the most intelligent people ever to assume the office of President: Jeane Kirkpatrick. As our first female president, her legacy will no doubt be remembered for years to come," President Mitt Romney addressing the nation after Jeane Kirkpatrick's death (December 07, 2006)


Mitt Romney always wanted to be president, but he never imagined he'd ascend to the office under such tragic circumstances. Like the rest of the nation, he was shocked to hear of Kirkpatrick's passing. Her death sent shockwaves through the political landscape, but reality quickly set in. Romney was left to deal with two unwinnable wars, a dysfunctional administration and a divided congress.

The Romney Administration


In many ways, Romney's presidency was over before it even began. The administration struggled to find direction. Romney's first action was an attempt to course correct the war in Venezuela. The White House asked congress for a troop surge and intensified bombing campaigns around the country.  The move was met with heavy criticism.

The bad press would continue for Romney after a slew or resignations from his administration during the Summer. Stories of a dysfunctional administration also leaked to the press. The White House denied these rumors, stating that these were simple personnel changes.

"It has become extremely clear over the past few days that the White House is lacking leadership," House Speaker Dick Gephardt (June 04, 2007)

"We've had a couple of transitions within the past few days, but I want to assure the American people that things are running very smoothly here," President Mitt Romney during a press conference (June 09, 2007)

Rumors of additional resignations and dysfunction would persist, but very soon, things would get much worse for the White House.

LEHMAN BROTHERS COLLAPSES, DOW PLUNGES 4000 POINTS AP News, (July 10, 2007)

Economic Collapse


"It is absolutely no exaggeration to say that our entire financial system is now in jeopardy," Financial Analyst Hugh Johnson on CNN (July 12, 2007)

"We need to take action now or we may not have an economy Monday," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke in a closed door meeting with President Romney (July 14, 2007)

The collapse of the housing bubble and several lingering economic problems brought on by deregulation, inflation and the war effort resulted in an unprecedented economic crisis. Within the span of two weeks, two of the largest banks in the nation: Lehman Brothers and  Merrill Lynch, went bankrupt. The stock market lost over 5 points, its worst drop since 1929. Investors panicked as the crisis spread to markets around the globe.

Legislation quickly passed the Senate to prevent further banking collapses. The Democratic controlled house shot down the bill, arguing it was a bailout for large banks. Ultimately, an amended version including a Mortgage Assistance Program was signed into law by the end of July. The economy stabilized, but was in a far from functional state.

Republican Challenger


"We find ourselves in a dangerous world, a time of crisis both here at home and abroad. It fills we with great regret to say that our current President is not equipped to face these challenges. I am running to bring Conservative values back to the White House-- to bring back security both here at home and abroad and to fight back against the expansive government promoted by Mitt Romney," Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee announcing his Presidential Campaign, (July 29, 2007)

As the country faced multiple crises that the White House seemed ill equipped to handle, Republican backlash against Mitt Romney grew. The party's conservative base was skeptical of Romney ever since he was announced as Kirkpatrick's running mate due to his self-identification as a moderate. Despite trying to make in roads with the base, many conservatives continued to disapprove of Romney. Romney's sweeping actions to respond to the growing recession further alienated conservatives, especially the concessions he made to pass his stimulus package.

Mike Huckabee, first elected in 2002 after the Republican legislature amended the constitution to prevent longtime Governor Bill Clinton from running for a 6th term, quickly became a conservative icon. His conservative appeal caught the attention of many within the party and he was even on the shortlist for the VP slot in 2004.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,330
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: May 24, 2023, 11:29:18 PM »

Hopefully the Dems can come roaring back with a Scoop Jackson type figure who supports progressive policies on bread and butter issues but also wants to confront the Communists abroad.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: August 07, 2023, 04:09:07 PM »

2008 Democratic Primaries

Wikimedia Commons

"In this moment of economic turmoil, the Republicans have proven themselves ineffective. Mitt Romney cares more about protecting the rich than the working class American now struggling to put food on the table. I am running to restore dignity and compassion to the White House," Senator Hillary Clinton (D-AR) announcing her presidential bid (July 01, 2007)

Even before the recession began, Democrats knew 2008 would present a major opportunity to win back the White House. Longtime Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton was floated around as a possible Presidential contender. Clinton had won six consecutive terms and was still popular despite multiple controversies and his recent retirement. His wife, Hillary, became the state's Junior Senator in 2000. The two became major figures within the party, playing a key role in reshaping the party's foreign policy approach during the 2006 Midterms.

When the political power couple announced a joint rally in their home state in July of 2006, pundits expected Governor Clinton to announce his long speculated campaign. However, Bill Clinton would announce he would be running for his wife's senate seat while Hillary would launch her presidential campaign. The move was met with cynicism from many on the right. Clinton's successor and GOP Presidential Contender Mike Huckabee accused the two of attempting to create their own political dynasty.

Senator Clinton joined a field comprising of two of her colleges: Senate Majority Leader Joe Biden and North Carolina Senator John Edwards. Biden ran on similar liberal principles as Former President Ted Kennedy and tried to win over Republican voters who where now critical of Romney with an ambitious plan to end the wars in Venezuela and Cuba. The Delaware Senator also parroted Romney's controversial claim that the Soviets orchestrated the Venezuelan insurgency.   

Wikimedia Commons

"It's absolutely crucial that America re-establish its moral authority and leadership role in the world. A weak and directionless America is a recipe for global instability," Senator John Edwards (D-NC) on the campaign trail in Pennsylvania (July 29, 2007)

Learning from his failure in 2004, Edwards aimed to offer common sense solution to America's problems. He embraced major policy proposals such as a universal healthcare plan while also supporting a minimum wage increase. These plans had their predictable supporters and opponents. The Senator polled behind Biden and Clinton, and almost every pundit considered his nomination a long shot in light of his progressive policies. But come January of 2008, Edwards gained momentum thanks to grass roots efforts and managed to win the Iowa caucus. He embraced the youth vote, using the internet as a major communication tool.

The Edwards Campaign embraced what it called "common sense" campaigning during the primaries, focusing very little on attacking Biden or Clinton but spending all of its energy and  advertising on Edwards' economic and healthcare policies. It proved highly successful, eventually leading to Edwards clinching the nomination in April.


The Conservative Upset


"Iowa, you sent a very clear message to this administration: weak and directionless leadership is not going to cut it," Governor Mike Huckabee after winning the Iowa Caucus (January 03, 2008)

Huckabee scored a major upset victory in the Iowa Caucus, immediately turning his insurgent campaign into a threat for Romney. The incumbent President hastily directed funds to New Hampshire in response to the newly energized campaign. Romney was dealt another blow after Walt Havenstein, New Hampshire's governor, endorsed Huckabee. The major endorsement was enough to push Huckabee over the edge to his second victory against the incumbent President.

January 15's Michigan primary became a must win, after polls showed Huckabee overtaking Romney for the nomination. Romney spent the next few days traveling across the state, promising voters he will do everything he can to fix the economy. Huckabee continued to slam Romney, hoping an appeal to the state's working class would bring him a third primary victory. Romney managed to scrape by in the end, gaining much needed momentum.

From that night forward, Romney became the frontrunner again. With the full funding might of GOP Party Leaders behind him, he secured the nomination in April with a win in Pennsylvania. The incumbent president was battered by the unexpectedly competitive nomination process and the party was still divided.




The Olive Branch

Wikimedia Commons


"President Romney and I had a lengthy conversation before I made this decision. I brought the concerns I have heard from people all across this country: the state of the economy, our progress in the war against Marxists insurgents abroad, the leftist attack on our culture. He took them to heart, acknowledged his prior failures and promised to do better. Humility is a mark of a good man. Romney deserves to be at the top of the ticket, and I am honored to be his running mate," Governor Mike Huckabee after announcing he will be Romney's running mate (June 23, 2008)


It was a daring choice by the Romney campaign. The suggestion to take Jeb Bush off the ticket and replace him with Huckabee-- Romney's biggest Republican Rival-- wasn't even taken seriously when it was first brought up by top campaign staff. Only one person liked the idea-- Romney himself. To everyone's surprise, he was a huge proponent of bringing Huckabee on to unite the party against a strongly positioned Edwards campaign.

The party's conservative base was still unwilling to accept Romney after he won the nomination. Bringing Huckabee onto the ticket brought a significant number back, but a few diehard members were still unconvinced.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: December 04, 2023, 02:52:58 PM »

A Failed Gamble




“I am proud to have been given the opportunity to serve the American people in the highest office of the land. Regardless of who is in charge, I will always work for what’s best for America,” President Mitt Romney conceding the 2008 Election (11/04/2008)

“I stand here tonight on behalf of the everyday American who has been cripped under the weight of rising expenses and a struggling economy. We can work together to make things right, and make our country stronger,” President elect John Edwards upon winning the election (11/04/2008)

No matter how hard the GOP tried, they could not prevent the inevitable defeat of Mitt Romney. The battered economy was a weight too heavy to carry him to a full term. Edwards’ touted his support for the common man, who had been directly impacted by one of the worst recessions of the past 50 years. Romney was seen as out of touch, unable to understand the new burdens the so-called “Great Recession” brought upon the working class.

His focus on foreign policy also dealt a significant blow to his campaign. As the state of the economy worsened, fewer voters were paying attention to what was going on overseas. To many—money spent in two wars that America could not win was wasteful. As Edwards argued on the campaign trail, that money could be spent elsewhere.

The conservative base of the party was still unconvinced, despite Romney’s Hail Mary move of picking Huckabee as his running mate. To them, he was still weak and ineffective. His history as a moderate and the many compromises made to the Democrats during his short time in office were blunders too big to ignore. A growing number of conservative figures lamented how unimportant the defeat of Communism seemed to be to the average voter.

Romney’s support for additional actions in Venezuela and Cuba convinced some conservatives to go to the polls, but a significant amount stayed home.
Worse still for the Republicans—low turnout among their base meant a slew of defeats in Congress. Edwards would have a trifecta once he was sworn in, as control of the Senate swung to the Democrats. An ambitious health care plan, withdrawal from Venezuela and cuts to the military were all possibilities under an Edwards Administration.

“Strategic Withdrawal”

“Look: we are in no means talking about a complete retreat from the radical Marxists that threaten our way of life. However, we must face the facts. We aren’t winning. We must take a different approach,” President John Edwards addressing criticism towards his approach on Venezuela (02/19/2009)

[center[/center]

Wikimedia Commons

One of the most immediate priorities for the new Edwards Administration was addressing Venezuela. Among his new cabinet, there was universal agreement that the nation needed to take a step back – but there was a split on just how much. Secretary of State Al Gore and Defense Secretary John Kerry promoted a partial withdrawal while more progressive cabinet members wanted a complete pullback.

In the end—the partial withdraw faction won out. The plan was to remove over half of the troops stationed in Venezuela and transfer them to Cuba—where military officials believed the US was nearing a breakthrough against insurgent forces.  It received harsh criticism from Republicans and progressives, but the general public was supportive of the “strategic withdraw” as the administration phrased it.

Despite a well-funded opposition campaign from the GOP, the withdraw plan easily passed Congress by March. Thousands of troops would be removed from Venezuela and transferred to Cuba. Additionally, billions were set aside to strengthen the new Venezuelan military to fight the insurgency. Only a couple of weeks after the bill passed, the insurgency within Venezuela gained a significant amount of territory.

“It’s a total disgrace what is happening. We made a commitment to the good people of Venezuela, we promised we would free them from communist tyranny. Now—President Edwards has abandoned them to a group even more radical than Chavez,” Representative Rudy Giuliani (R- NY) speaking on Hannity (03/02/2009)

But weeks later—the defeat would become a distant memory as the American people would celebrate a military victory for the first time in over 5 years.

BREAKING: ELIZABETH ANN DUKE CAPTURED IN CUBA: AP News (03/20/2009)
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: January 15, 2024, 01:00:32 PM »

“My fellow Americans, just hours ago, our military conducted a successful capture of one of the world’s most dangerous terrorists: Elizabeth Ann Duke. The terrifying threat of radical Marxism has been dealt a crippling blow. I promise the American people, most especially the victims of May 19th and their families, that Duke will be brought to justice for her heinous crimes,” President John Edwards addressing the nation after the capture of Elizabeth Ann Duke (03/20/2009).

The nation celebrated its first victory in over a decade on March 20th. For the first time in recent memory, Americans were united over the capture of one of the world’s most dangerous terrorists. Spontaneous celebrations broke out in the streets of major cities and sports games were interrupted to play President Edwards’ address to the nation.
The day after— the reality of the unprecedented prosecution of Duke set in. Officials within the Edwards administration did not plan to capture Duke alive and had not thought out the complexities of putting her trial through the legal system. Duke never revoked her citizenship, but prosecutors argued she was no longer a citizen because she committed an act of treason. 

Defense Secretary John Kerry advocated for Duke to be tried before a military tribunal, to bring closure to the nation. Leftist and socialist groups immediately began protesting this proposal.

“What Elizabeth Ann Duke did was abhorrent, no one is saying that it isn’t. But—Duke is still an American. Like any American, she has a constitutional right to a fair trial,” Cenk Uygur on The Young Turks (04/10/2009).

“Liberals are now dedicating time and energy to defend one of the worst humans to ever walk the face of the Earth. The lengths these people are going to is ridiculous, and really, unamerican,” Rush Limbaugh during his daily radio show (04/13/2009).

The protests over Duke intensified over the next few weeks. Thousands of socialists, many of them former members of parties banned by the Rumsfeld Administration, waved Cuban and Soviet flags in the streets. A few of these demonstrations even became violent, most notably in Dallas.

The demonstrations in Dallas continued for several days. They were organized by Ron Oleng, a militant socialist activist, and former head of the state’s Communist Party. Oleng brought his personal militia to each demonstration and would threaten right wing counter protesters. Governor Rick Perry responded to the growing tensions by deploying the national guard to Dallas, a move which the Edwards administration criticized.   
 
Oleng was emboldened by the presence of the Texas National Guard. The first night they were deployed, he ordered his militia the National Guard soldiers that had lined the streets of the city after a violent night of demonstrations. A firefight broke out in the middle of the street—killing one solider, and critically injuring another.

The tragedy significantly weakened support for Duke to face a conventional trial. Within a matter of weeks—the matter was taken to the Supreme Court, where they ruled in favor of the Edwards Administration. Duke faced a military tribunal in March, who sentenced her to death.   
Logged
WhigFreak1836
Newbie
*
Posts: 1
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: January 15, 2024, 08:01:02 PM »

Great timeline! What’s going on in the Middle East, in particular regarding Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Saudi Arabia?
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2024, 11:47:59 AM »

Great timeline! What’s going on in the Middle East, in particular regarding Iran, Iraq, Israel, and Saudi Arabia?

Hopefully, I can expand on this in a future update.
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 19, 2024, 01:05:55 PM »

The Healthcare Debate

Congressional vote on the “Shared Health Responsibility Act” (08/09/2009)

House: 235-199
Senate: 48-51

Like Kennedy before him, President Edwards was unable to unify Congress around a universal healthcare plan. The opposition of two Democratic Senators: Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Max Baucus of Montana; along with the absence of West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, was enough to derail the plan.

Edwards’ plan would require all employers to either provide or help cover health insurance, expand Medicaid eligibility, and would create new regional public Healthcare programs. He framed it as a way for all Americans to share a “collective responsibility” to cover the cost of healthcare.

Opposition was the fiercest among business owners, particularly small business owners who argued the new requirements would give them unreasonable expenses. The controversial business requirement was even labeled as socialist in certain conservative circles.

“What John Edwards tried to do was communism.  Plain and simple. He’s forcing businesses to participate in collective ownership of a bloated healthcare system. This would destroy our economy, and completely nerf small businesses. That’s why the American people oppose it, and that’s why the Senate rejected it,” Andrew Breitbart criticizing Edwards’ healthcare plan (08/11/2009)

The Edwards Administration went back to the drawing board. Their focus now was to lower Medicaid requirements and eliminate healthcare costs. The less ambitious plan was a bit more popular, and most importantly, supported by the entire Democratic Senate Conference. In September, it passed both chambers of Congress and was signed by Edwards.

“This is not the plan we wanted, but it is a significant step forward. After today, millions of uninsured Americans will now have a healthcare plan. I’m committed to continued reforms, and an eventual overhaul, of our broken healthcare system,” President Edwards upon passing the Medicaid Expansion Act (09/14/2009)

Red Wave Movement


Despite a modest recovery beginning to take shape in America, much of the world was still suffering from the effects of the global financial crisis by 2009. Several first world nations experienced unprecedented unemployment and recession. Greece was one of the hardest hit countries, as the recession sparked a massive currency crisis. In October of 2009, financial instability sparked a massive protest in the streets of Athens.

Most protesters were under 30 years old and were sympathetic to socialist ideals. Their movement opposed free market capitalism—embracing elements of a planned economy. They advocated primarily for income equality and a greater standard of living. Few within their ranks openly advocated for a communist regime, but the movement did not endorse the Soviets. Most would wave generic, red flags—earning the movement its name.

These Red Wave demonstrations soon spread to other Western European nations, the Middle East and eventually the United States. America’s Red Wave movement came fresh off the heels of the healthcare debate. The movement’s leaders were able to tap into left wing dissatisfaction with the Edwards administration to quickly gain a large following. Although viewed as a fringe faction of America’s political left wing, many of the movement’s ideas would later become mainstream within the party by the mid-2010s.

“It is absolutely unacceptable that we are the only First World nation without a national healthcare system. President Edwards talked a big game, but in the end, he bowed to his corporate puppet masters,” Fmr Senator Mike Gravel speaking at the Red Wave’s DC March (11/12/2009)

The movement’s friendly attitude towards socialism made it unpopular with the majority of Americans, particularly older Americans. Videos from Red Wave demonstrations quickly found their way into Republican ads for the upcoming midterms—as the GOP was eager to get back into the public’s good graces after the Romney Presidency.

Red Wave demonstrations also sprung up in Eastern Europe and even the Soviet Union by early 2010. These movements placed a greater focus on social liberalism, criticizing corruption, and calls for democracy. Ironically, Zyuganov accused the west of orchestrating these demonstrations.
Logged
Kahane's Grave Is A Gender-Neutral Bathroom
theflyingmongoose
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,330
Norway


Political Matrix
E: 3.41, S: -1.29

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 25, 2024, 04:24:30 AM »

What did the Medicaid Expansion Act do versus Obamacare? I remember it was mentioned that Kennedy had done some mild healthcare expansion.
Logged
BigVic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,492
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: March 27, 2024, 09:12:13 AM »
« Edited: March 27, 2024, 07:11:51 PM by BigVic »

An attack on the scale of 9/11 in Spring was the original plan from the hijackers before delaying it to late summer that year. 5/19 was a Saturday and 5/22 6 days before Memorial Day
Logged
paxamericana
Rookie
**
Posts: 83


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: 5.30

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: April 22, 2024, 01:46:49 PM »

Digital Iron Curtain

Ongoing red-wave movements throughout Eastern Europe hang over Bulgaria’s 2009 parliamentary elections. Like most Eastern Bloc nations—Bulgaria was a one-party state. The Bulgarian Communist Party, led by Aleksandar Paunov, had maintained a supermajority in the parliament for decades. Paunov had been the nation’s prime minister since 1988 and like Zyuganov, was weary of the growing protests spreading through the communist world.

As the protests grew, so did Paunov’s insecurity. Fearing his iron grip on the nation was slipping, he ordered mass arrests of the movement’s leaders just one month before the July elections. The move angered Yane Yanev—who was secretly a prominent figure in the country’s red wave movement. Yanev was the leader of the nation’s token opposition party-- Order, Law and Justice—which had been established during the 1990s due to Paunov’s fears East Germany’s Democratic Protests would spread to his country. The party held only 12 seats, mostly representing the interests of rural farmers. All nominees had to pledge support to Communist ideals and were forbidden to directly criticize the ruling party.

Yanew hatched a plan to overthrow Paunov’s government by inspiring red-wave protestors to vote for OLJ nominees throughout the country. The nominees were carefully selected by Yanew, to ensure they abided by the nation’s laws and flew under the radar.

On election night, Order, Law and Justice saw an unexpected surge but failed to gain a majority. The results panicked Paunov, who immediately ordered the arrest of Yanew and a ban on the OJL party. Over in Moscow, Zyuganov was also deeply troubled by these results. While his predecessor scaled back the USSR’s involvement in its satellite states, Zyuganov was more hands-on. In August of 2009, he scheduled a meeting with the leaders of the satellite states and gave them a strict demand—implement unforgiving de-westernization policies or lose funding for Moscow.

The most significant of these new policies was a complete ban on personal computers which Western journalists dubbed a “Digitial Iron Curtain.” A highly censored and controlled version of the internet was tolerated in many Soviet states but under the new laws, it could only be used in public spaces. The move drew international condemnation but succeeded in significantly weakening red-wave movements in Eastern Europe.

“The West is using its new technological inventions to subvert our beloved homeland. They have poisoned the minds of our young people, causing disorder and violence to spill into the streets,” General Secretary Gennady Zyuganov speaking before the Politburo (September 13, 2009).

Victory In Cuba

“After decades of tyranny, freedom will once again reign in Cuba. Today’s victory would not have been possible without the thousands of Americans and Cubans who sacrificed so much to fight this radical communist regime. I’m looking forward to working with this new government to form a powerful partnership,” President John Edwards addressing the nation after insurgency defeat in Havana (December 12, 2009)

The war pundits christened as America’s next Vietnam ended in victory at the end of 2009. After Duke’s capture, the pro-Castro insurgency fell apart and was quickly pushed back to the capital of Havana. A months-long siege on the city ended in December with minimal American casualties.

It was a victory that came at just the right time for Edwards, who was still desperate to distance himself and his party from the growing socialist-friendly red-wave movement ahead of the midterm elections. The White House argued President Edwards’ “strategic withdrawal” policy from Venzesula contributed to the war’s end.

Like Duke’s capture in March, the nation was united in celebration in the following weeks. After a massive military victory parade in Washington DC a week before Christmas, President Edwards’ approval ratings shot up to over 60 percent.

The new Cuban government was led by René Hernández, who was the leader of the once-banned Christian Democratic Party of Cuba. In January 2010, he oversaw a task force to draft a brand new Constitution– which implemented a presidential system of government modeled after the United States and brought democratic reforms to the nation. Hernández and his PDC won large majorities in the new government’s first elections.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.092 seconds with 11 queries.