SR 113-67: Adequate Consideration Resolution (Passed)

[FT-02 Senator A.F.E. 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦]

Aye on WB's amendment

Nay on R's amendment

[Mr. Reactionary]

WB Amendment fails 5-8-2-3

R Amendment passes 8-2-2-6

I move for a final vote to clear the floor for next session. 24 hours to object.

[Mr. Reactionary]

Final vote is now open until Friday morning eastern or until everyone has voted.

[West_Midlander]

Aye.

I have heard the complaint that sometimes multiple laws are relevant in a repeal/reform effort but this bill doesn't prevent that. It only says that there needs to be a broad consensus (2/3rds support) to achieve that.

[PPT Spiral]

Nay

[At-Large Senator LouisvilleThunder]

Aye

[OSR stands with Israel]

Aye

[fhtagn]

Aye

[GM Team Member and Senator WB]

Nay

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Aye

[LAKISYLVANIA]

Changing to abstain

[Utah Neolib]

Abstain

[Liminal Trans Girl]

Abstain

[OriAr]

Aye

[Mr. Reactionary]

Aye

[Mr. Reactionary]

Bump to the top

[FT-02 Senator A.F.E. 🇵🇸🤝🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦]

Nay

[Mr. Reactionary]

Resolution passes 6-4-3-5.

[Mr. Reactionary]

ADEQUATE CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION

1. Article II, section 3 of the Official Senate Rules and Procedures shall be amended as follows:

...

d.) The twenty-third and twenty-fourth slots shall be reserved for the President of the Republic of Atlasia for bills, appointments, treaties, and Constitutional Amendments and administered by either the President of the Senate or the PPT.

e.) The twenty-fifth slot shall be reserved for public bill and Constitutional Amendment submissions and shall be introduced by the President of the Senate PPT.

...

2. Article VI of the Official Senate Rules and Procedures shall be amended by adding the following:

...

5. ) Any bill that seeks to repeal two (2) or more federal laws adopted after June 1, 2016 in the same bill shall not be able to be brought to a final vote without a two-thirds vote of the whole Senate. Any bill that seeks to amend two (2) or more federal laws adopted after June 1, 2016 in the same bill shall not be able to be brought to a final vote without a two-thirds vote of the whole Senate. This rule shall expire ninety (90) days after the date of enactment.


...

Passed 6-4-3-5 in the Atlasian Senate assembled.

- R, PPT

[Pericles]

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

[West_Midlander]

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

If high-quality means people who vote in this body regularly, or who ever post more than just Aye or Nay at the party's insistence, it's doubtful that will ever happen.

Also, PSA for anyone Pericles sweet-talked: The majority constituted by Labor and its "allies" is of, by, and for the Labor Party, not any of their supposed allies or the Atlasian people, according to Pericles.

He either wants a solid Labor majority without any other parties taking part, or he views a partnership with Labor as being in Labor.

[Pericles]

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

If high-quality means people who vote in this body regularly, or who ever post more than just Aye or Nay at the party's insistence, it's doubtful that will ever happen.

Also, PSA for anyone Pericles sweet-talked: The majority constituted by Labor and its "allies" is of, by, and for the Labor Party, not any of their supposed allies or the Atlasian people, according to Pericles.

He either wants a solid Labor majority without any other parties taking part, or he views a partnership with Labor as being in Labor.

This is a lame attack-of course I want more Senators to be in my political party, as do you.

[West_Midlander]

This is a depraved act by the Senate-you better hope we don't remember your bad faith when the Labor Party has a majority again with high-quality Senators!

If high-quality means people who vote in this body regularly, or who ever post more than just Aye or Nay at the party's insistence, it's doubtful that will ever happen.

Also, PSA for anyone Pericles sweet-talked: The majority constituted by Labor and its "allies" is of, by, and for the Labor Party, not any of their supposed allies or the Atlasian people, according to Pericles.

He either wants a solid Labor majority without any other parties taking part, or he views a partnership with Labor as being in Labor.

This is a lame attack-of course I want more Senators to be in my political party, as do you.

You shouldn't talk about people as if you know them if you don't. A Federalist-alone majority would probably be less ideologically aligned with me than a split Senate. You're either lying or willfully ignorant to suggest I'm a solid partisan.