Preemptive policy re: probable Roe v. Wade overturn (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:48:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Preemptive policy re: probable Roe v. Wade overturn (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Preemptive policy re: probable Roe v. Wade overturn  (Read 2234 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,427


« on: June 24, 2022, 12:23:37 AM »
« edited: June 24, 2022, 12:27:38 AM by Supporter and promoter of anti-white racism »

Keep discussion of political implications to USGD and moral discussion to Individual Politics, Political Debate, and R&P. Those are legitimate and important topics, but this board is for discussion of the constitutional and legal merits of concepts and events in our justice system and legal/judicial profession, and I'll be enforcing that subject-matter limitation strictly and narrowly as concerns the Dobbs ruling. See Ernest's stickied thread from his time as mod of this board for more on what this means:

Discussion about how the law should be interpreted is welcome here, but discussion of what the law should be as opposed to what the law is generally belongs on another board....Note that meta-discussions about what should be covered in a constitution and what should be left to general law is certainly on topic for this board.

Anything smacking of personal invective against other posters will be deleted on sight.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.