Preemptive policy re: probable Roe v. Wade overturn

(1/1)

Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.:
Keep discussion of political implications to USGD and moral discussion to Individual Politics, Political Debate, and R&P. Those are legitimate and important topics, but this board is for discussion of the constitutional and legal merits of concepts and events in our justice system and legal/judicial profession, and I'll be enforcing that subject-matter limitation strictly and narrowly as concerns the Dobbs ruling. See Ernest's stickied thread from his time as mod of this board for more on what this means:

Quote from: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on June 29, 2011, 01:31:31 PM

Discussion about how the law should be interpreted is welcome here, but discussion of what the law should be as opposed to what the law is generally belongs on another board....Note that meta-discussions about what should be covered in a constitution and what should be left to general law is certainly on topic for this board.



Anything smacking of personal invective against other posters will be deleted on sight.

Navigation

[0] Message Index