Why did Carter do so well in Arkansas in 1976? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:00:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Carter do so well in Arkansas in 1976? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Carter do so well in Arkansas in 1976?  (Read 1806 times)
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW
« on: January 01, 2007, 01:10:18 PM »

He defeated Ford 64%-34%, his biggest margin in the South outisde of Georgia.  I think it is odd considering his margins in Louisiana, Mississippi and Oklahoma were much smaller, where he ran more or less even with Ford.  Relative to the rest of the South, the Arkansas result is strange.  Georgia was Carter's homestate but what reason did Arkansas have to especially love him? 

I know that Bill Clinton organised his campaign statewide and it could be a tribute to his organisational qualities.  Also, Arkansas seems like the kind of place Carter would play well in, like West Virginia.  Poor, mostly rural and less urban and middle-class than other Southern states.  Finally, if Carter was so strong there in 1976 why couldn't he win it in 1980?  His performance should mean that he could still carry it comfortably in 1980 but instead it was another Southern state that he ran very close to Reagan in. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.