Has GOP recruitment given Dems a shot at holding the Senate?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:36:59 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Has GOP recruitment given Dems a shot at holding the Senate?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Has GOP recruitment given Dems a shot at holding the Senate?  (Read 2241 times)
Dr Oz Lost Party!
PittsburghSteel
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,979
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: June 28, 2022, 11:33:22 AM »

Laxalt is a good candidate, and I'd say Oz and Masters are neutral.
NH has a good shot at flipping even without Sununu

Someone with a -33 favorability rating is most certainly not a “neutral” candidate.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,685
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: June 29, 2022, 01:46:29 AM »

Tbf for the GOP, is there really much of a benefit to winning the Senate in 2022 beyond stopping Biden from confirming anymore justices to courts? Even if they somehow end up with just 48 seats in a worse case scenario, Biden will still control the White House and the Senate will almost surely flip R in 2024 when they actually have a chance to control the Pres.

Also rmbr the next time this Senate map will be up is in 2028, a Presidential year, which by nature will likely be more stable no matter who wins overall. Any flips the GOP make this cycle would be very vulnerable come 2028, especially since states like AZ and GA seem to generally be getting bluer.


If they get down to 48 then it becomes an open question as to whether the filibuster is retained. Of course, dems may not bother with it if they still lose the house in this world, and we can argue all day whether Feinstein/King/Kelly/Tester/Kaine/Casey/Shaheen/Hassan would actually do it if they were the deciding vote, but at least the possibility for its elimination is there. And with the possible exception of eliminating the Hyde Amendment, that would allow Democrats to pass their full legislative menu through the Senate.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.