1992 and 1996 if perot never ran
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 03:14:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  1992 and 1996 if perot never ran
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1992 and 1996 if perot never ran  (Read 1618 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 26, 2006, 01:02:12 AM »

1992:

Clinton 283-255

1996:

Clinton 291-247
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 26, 2006, 10:27:37 AM »

If Perot never ran at all (meaning he didn't get in the race and then jump out):

1992:



311-227

1996:



384-154
Logged
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 26, 2006, 05:57:46 PM »
« Edited: December 26, 2006, 06:01:22 PM by Chuck Hagel 08 »

What 1996 would look like if it was Clinton v. Bush I without Perot.  Basically, Bush I enters the race in an attempt to become another Grover Cleveland, only to be beaten even worse than in 1992.


Clinton 385-153

Clinton 52%
Bush I  47%


Bush I would gain NV, TN, and KY
Clinton would gain VA and FL
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2006, 12:21:53 PM »

If Perot never ran at all (meaning he didn't get in the race and then jump out):

1992:



311-227

1996:



384-154

In the 1992 Race, why do you not have Ohio and Wisconsin in the Bush column. These states would have gone Bush without Perot. Also he would have won more of the east coast. Including Delaware, Connecticut, Maine. Vermont, and if he was lucky Pennsylvania.

Ohio and Wisconsin would have been very close, which is why I have them that way.  It would be all up to the undecideds in those states.  States like DE, CT, and VT all went through what I like to think of as "Clinton Revolution," much like the Reagan Revolution.  Before Clinton was President, all three of those states were belleweather states, but if you look at after the Clinton presidency, you can see that most of them are solidly Democratic states.  Clinton's moderatism on economics really appealed to the middle class in these states.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.228 seconds with 13 queries.