Pennsylvania Was Stolen

[TeePee4Prez]

this is a bunch of bs

You just can't handle the truth.

No Ebowed.  This is BS.

Wow. It really is a shame how people can't accept when things are completely meant for laughs.

By the way, Flyers, you are pretty foolish if you can't admit that there is some serious voter fraud in this city.

I know.  It's on BOTH sides of the fence though so it evens out. 

[Keystone Phil]

I know.  It's on BOTH sides of the fence though so it evens out. 

No, Flyers, the voting fraud in Philly is clearly one sided. I'm not saying that it happens on both sides but there are far more cases with the Dems conducting such acts.

[TeePee4Prez]

I know.  It's on BOTH sides of the fence though so it evens out. 

No, Flyers, the voting fraud in Philly is clearly one sided. I'm not saying that it happens on both sides but there are far more cases with the Dems conducting such acts.

Uhh??? Hmm....... Sam Mirarchi/George Kenney ring a bell?  "Official Russian Translator" then they tell people who don't know a word of English to vote straight GOP.  Saw it myself at a polling place and observed 2 results myself.  Never saw any Dem problems where I worked, but I'm sure there are in other parts of the city.  You're probably right citywide, but I know it happens midstate PA with the GOP.  This state is simply not that conservative.     

[Keystone Phil]

I know.  It's on BOTH sides of the fence though so it evens out. 

No, Flyers, the voting fraud in Philly is clearly one sided. I'm not saying that it happens on both sides but there are far more cases with the Dems conducting such acts.

Uhh??? Hmm....... Sam Mirarchi/George Kenney ring a bell?  "Official Russian Translator" then they tell people who don't know a word of English to vote straight GOP.

You honestly think that that outweighs what the Dems do here? Wake up, hack. Wake up.

 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So your point about Mirarchi/Kenney was just your usual whinning? Ok, good.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

So it has to be voter fraud! 

By the way, this state simply does not have that many dead people who are capable of voting!

[Ebowed]

Bump for truth

[Lunar]

thank god there are no races in Pennsylvania in 2010, otherwise people would have ended up getting nasty again

[TeePee4Prez]

thank god there are no races in Pennsylvania in 2010, otherwise people would have ended up getting nasty again

Uhh... Yes, there are.

[Badger]

thank god there are no races in Pennsylvania in 2010, otherwise people would have ended up getting nasty again

Uhh... Yes, there are.

<Whispers> Psssst! It's called 'sarcasm'.

[Keystone Phil]

thank god there are no races in Pennsylvania in 2010, otherwise people would have ended up getting nasty again

Uhh... Yes, there are.

...

Wow.

[hcallega]

BOB CASEY JR. IS THE MAN!

[Ebowed]

BOB CASEY JR. IS THE MAN!

He is an election thief, actually.

[Bacon King]

Wow Ebowed, thank you for showing me the light!

[Rob]

I remember this outrage. It's a shame Pennsylvania no longer has a pro-life, pro-gun, pro-Alito Senator.

[Хahar 🤔]

Wait, what? This thread confuses me.

[Ebowed]

When the Democrats won the PA-12 congressional special election last month, the 10,000 vote victory for Mark Critz was seen as a stunning blow to the GOP, which had staked its success in the general election on this result.  Explanations have been offered, such as the highly publicized Senatorial primary between Sen. Arlen Specter and Rep. Joseph Sestak, which energized Democrats to show up and vote out the establishment incumbent candidate in one primary as many of them went on to vote for the establishment candidate in the special election.

Allegations that Critz was campaigning in polling booths on the date of the election, as well as strategically mailing duplicate ballots, are indicative of his character, but do not explain alone how he outperformed the polls (generally conducted by partisan Democrats) suggesting he would win by a small margin.  Democrats were certainly preparing for a loss, noting that the demographics of the district no longer favored the ideology of the party and the loyalty that many of its inhabitants had to the party had radically diminished in the last three presidential elections.

Obama was thought to have approval around 35% in the district, and Critz campaigned as a Labor Democrat who was strongly opposed to cap and trade, health care reform, legal abortion, and gun control.  His opponent, Tim Burns, sought to portray the election as a referendum on the Obama/Pelosi agenda, and he was boosted with support from grassroots members of the 'chamomile tea party' and other conservative activists.  Polling indicated a close race, with a clear advantage to Burns, when taking the partisan preferences of most pollsters into account (unfortunately, Rasmussen did not release one of his excellent polls before the election, which would have been the best measure of the public mood).  Voters in the district were well aware that a Democratic majority in Congress could mean the destruction of their coal mining industry, with people eventually finding menial jobs in the socialist dystopia that would rise in its place all throughout the country.  People were also eager for a balance in what increasingly appears to be a government controlled by far leftists with a possibly foreign born ex-Muslim as its figurehead.  The last thing the people in these decaying Pittsburgh suburbs want or need is an economy that does not respect the principles of limited government and the wisdom in the autonomy of the free market.

Rep. John Murtha, now deceased, was notorious for his corruption, pork-barrel politics, and even managed to insult his constituents as racists in 2008 without consequence.  Mark Critz served as Murtha's district director, and managed to capture the Democratic nomination by locking up the establishment.  As a crony of Murtha, Critz certainly possessed the knowledge required to steal an election.  The only question is how much fraud Critz did end up committing - obviously, votes were stolen in Republican leaning Indiana, Somerset, Armstrong, and Westmoreland counties, and duplicate ballots were given out in ultra Democratic Fayette county, where the election supervisor there acknowledged that there were indeed excess ballots in the vote count.  It is possible that Critz also attempted to depress turn-out in unfavorable areas by introducing oversized feral dogs around polling areas.  He also paid voters, handing $50 notes to random people in swing precincts, and telling them to remember who "has [their] back."  Voters in Armstrong county were greeted with pamphlets claiming that Burns was a "closeted believer in the New Age movement" with false quotes from Burns including advice that "only through meditation can you finally break free from the shackles of organized religion."  Other pamphlets discussed Burns' compulsive habit of frequenting strip clubs in his mid-20s.

The NRCC and the GOP appear unwilling to press for investigations, but there is no question that Rep. Critz will eventually end up in legal heat for a wide range of fraudulent and corrupt activities.  It is only a matter of time, and perhaps the margin of victory for Burns in November will be so great that no amount of fraud and vote buying will be able to overcome it.

[RichmondFalls]

Informative (if terrifying!). Thank you for posting this, Ebowed.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Here's another stolen election:

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/individual/#mapHNY/H/16

[J. J.]

Allegations that Critz was campaigning in polling booths on the date of the election, as well as strategically mailing duplicate ballots, are indicative of his character, but do not explain alone how he outperformed the polls (generally conducted by partisan Democrats) suggesting he would win by a small margin.  Democrats were certainly preparing for a loss, noting that the demographics of the district no longer favored the ideology of the party and the loyalty that many of its inhabitants had to the party had radically diminished in the last three presidential elections.

I'm not clear what you mean by "strategically mailing duplicate ballots."  It has become common for the parties to mail out absentee ballot applications.

[Franzl]

This is a joke, J.J.

[Lunar]

This is a joke, J.J.

He's in MENSA, he can obviously figure out that Ebowed isn't an investigative, anti-Democratic reporter consumed by the need to prove Democrats stole every election they've won in a state far away from his own in a thread that's established as a joke thread all the way from the second post on page 1 to here


[crickets]

[J. J.]

This is a joke, J.J.

Well that was the only questionable statement in the paragraph (well, so was campaigning at the polls, but that is fairly common). 

[Ebowed]

I'm not clear what you mean by "strategically mailing duplicate ballots."  It has become common for the parties to mail out absentee ballot applications.

Not ballot applications, but actual voting ballots: the duplicates were only reported to be given out in Fayette county, which has a massive Democratic registration advantage.

[J. J.]

I'm not clear what you mean by "strategically mailing duplicate ballots."  It has become common for the parties to mail out absentee ballot applications.

Not ballot applications, but actual voting ballots: the duplicates were only reported to be given out in Fayette county, which has a massive Democratic registration advantage.

Even if you are serious, it might be more indicative of a good ground campaign.

[Ebowed]

Apparently there is some kind of special election in Massachusetts in June, so the investigative team* that brought you these stunning insights into election fraud in Pennsylvania will be relocating, just to make sure that there is no fishy business in the Bay State this year.  We look forward to bringing you a first-hand account of our supposed democratic process in action.

*This may or may not consist of me wearing a denim jacket with many holes in it, walking around the state with a bottle of tequila and asking randoms on the street whether or not they've been asked to participate in any so-called scientific polls.

[Fuzzybigfoot]

Oh my