NetChoice v. Paxton (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 08:52:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  NetChoice v. Paxton (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NetChoice v. Paxton  (Read 470 times)
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


« on: May 13, 2022, 05:00:50 PM »

Either social media companies should have to abide by the first amendment OR they should have section 230 protections removed from them
Section 230 being removed is a road to a way more controlled internet and would accomplish the opposite of what intend. Section 230 being gone would be WORSE than the status quo.

Sure but social media companies who censor the way twitter has become cannot reasonably say they aren't responsible for what is posted on their platforms.



That's ridiculous. Just because you have some standards doesn't mean that by default you are saying literally everything that meets those standards.

Atlas Forum moderates posts. Does that mean that Atlas Forum should be liable for everything posted by its members? You are essentially killing all remotely free portions of the internet by asserting this.
Logged
Sestak
jk2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,281
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2022, 04:12:25 PM »

it's the standard 'normie conservative-liberal' alignment, except with Kagan I assume having one of her out-of-left-field hangups about this. Fairly predictable outcome other than that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.