Either social media companies should have to abide by the first amendment OR they should have section 230 protections removed from them
Section 230 being removed is a road to a way more controlled internet and would accomplish the opposite of what intend. Section 230 being gone would be WORSE than the status quo.
Sure but social media companies who censor the way twitter has become cannot reasonably say they aren't responsible for what is posted on their platforms.
That's ridiculous. Just because you have some standards doesn't mean that by default you are
saying literally everything that meets those standards.
Atlas Forum moderates posts. Does that mean that Atlas Forum should be liable for everything posted by its members? You are essentially killing all remotely free portions of the internet by asserting this.