Either social media companies should have to abide by the first amendment OR they should have section 230 protections removed from them
Section 230 being removed is a road to a way more controlled internet and would accomplish the opposite of what intend. Section 230 being gone would be WORSE than the status quo.
Sure but social media companies who censor the way twitter has become cannot reasonably say they aren't responsible for what is posted on their platforms.
Agree to disagree on that, but - I'd argue companies will not be as hurt if Section 230 is removed.
It will be users who suffer the most, bar none.