Sweden and Finland set to join NATO in May
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 12:01:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Sweden and Finland set to join NATO in May
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24
Author Topic: Sweden and Finland set to join NATO in May  (Read 30656 times)
MichaelRbn
Rookie
**
Posts: 192
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: August 09, 2022, 11:08:07 AM »

Biden scheduled to complete US ratification at 2:00 pm (local time) today.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: August 09, 2022, 01:58:40 PM »

Any news on the remaining 7 countries? Does anyone have a schedule for when their votes are scheduled?
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,626
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: August 09, 2022, 05:10:06 PM »

Any news on the remaining 7 countries? Does anyone have a schedule for when their votes are scheduled?

No. Hungary and Turkey will take their time as much as they can; Greece, Slovakia and Czechia are on summer recess. Spain sent it to Parliament on the 3rd, but it is causing significant strain between the PSOE and Podemos. No clue for Portugal.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,906
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: November 08, 2022, 03:35:08 PM »

So Erdogan apparently continues to block NATO admission after a meeting with Sweden's new prime minister. Hopefully he gets voted out next year.

Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: January 08, 2023, 09:37:06 AM »

Seems pretty serious. I thought the Swedish strategy was going to be to make optimistic noises in the expectation that Turkey would keep delaying, but only until after their 2023 election.

Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,906
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: January 08, 2023, 02:38:25 PM »

Seems pretty serious. I thought the Swedish strategy was going to be to make optimistic noises in the expectation that Turkey would keep delaying, but only until after their 2023 election.



I think at this point they should hope for a change after the 2023 election. I remain skeptical that Erdogan will actually be defeated leave office inspite of hyperinflation, an economic crisis and some Erdogan fatigue in Turkey. Relationships would certainly improve with a president from the CHP.
Logged
Storr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,243
Moldova, Republic of


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: January 08, 2023, 02:58:27 PM »

Seems pretty serious. I thought the Swedish strategy was going to be to make optimistic noises in the expectation that Turkey would keep delaying, but only until after their 2023 election.



I think at this point they should hope for a change after the 2023 election. I remain skeptical that Erdogan will actually be defeated leave office inspite of hyperinflation, an economic crisis and some Erdogan fatigue in Turkey. Relationships would certainly improve with a president from the CHP.

The main issue with hoping for change following the election is that the main opposition leader Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu has been jailed for calling members of the High Election Board "fools" (yes, seriously that's all he said) for canceling his March 2019 Mayoral victory. He won the June 2019 rerun, anyway. But the point is that, since opposition victories in the 2019 municipal elections, the government has been doing anything it can do hinder his chances of victory over Erdogan.

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230105-turkey-s-bickering-opposition-seeks-unity-against-erdogan

"The troubled fate of Istanbul's popular mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, one of Erdogan's most internationally recognised rivals, highlights the opposition's plight.

A court banned him from politics last month for slander in a case stemming from his 2019 victory, which was initially annulled.

Imamoglu can keep serving as mayor while the appeal process winds its way through the courts.

But a separate interior ministry probe against his office on "terrorism" charges threatens to sideline him sooner.

The twin cases make Imamoglu's candidacy extremely risky for the opposition, despite polls showing him beating Erdogan in a head-to-head race."
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: January 08, 2023, 03:14:29 PM »

I hate Erdogan and the Turkish government. Pathetic.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,773


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: January 08, 2023, 03:17:16 PM »

Seems pretty serious. I thought the Swedish strategy was going to be to make optimistic noises in the expectation that Turkey would keep delaying, but only until after their 2023 election.



I think at this point they should hope for a change after the 2023 election. I remain skeptical that Erdogan will actually be defeated leave office inspite of hyperinflation, an economic crisis and some Erdogan fatigue in Turkey. Relationships would certainly improve with a president from the CHP.

The main issue with hoping for change following the election is that the main opposition leader Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu has been jailed for calling members of the High Election Board "fools" (yes, seriously that's all he said) for canceling his March 2019 Mayoral victory. He won the June 2019 rerun, anyway. But the point is that, since opposition victories in the 2019 municipal elections, the government has been doing anything it can do hinder his chances of victory over Erdogan.

I don't think Erdogan is likely to be ousted - he's probably consolidated enough power to prevent this - but he's clearly a bit nervous (as all long-lasting rulers ought to be) and not taking it for granted.

This is why I thought there was (and possibly still is) some room for Sweden/Finland to hope for change after the election. Erdogan has electoral reasons to drum up nationalist sentinment prior to that and can more easily afford to scale back afterwards.

That being said, I find the Swedish PM's language much more pessimistic than previous statements. I'm not going to read too much into it beyond this assessment.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,921
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: January 08, 2023, 03:21:58 PM »

When I was in Istanbul in November, there were posters of Erdogan everywhere and some young people were taking selfies beside them. It was kinda scary, you don't even get that in Russia.
Logged
Former Dean Phillips Supporters for Haley (I guess???!?) 👁️
The Impartial Spectator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,846


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: January 08, 2023, 06:00:14 PM »

That being said, I find the Swedish PM's language much more pessimistic than previous statements. I'm not going to read too much into it beyond this assessment.

So here's the play if things are still not sorted following the Turkish election.

Step 1) A new organization called The North Atlantic Defense Organization is created. It is identical to NATO, except that it has a different letter in the 3rd word forming its NADO acronym. All current NATO members as well as Sweden and Finland are eligible to join NADO, should they wish to do so.

Step 2) Jens Steltenberg announces he is resigning as head of NATO, and by coincidence, is simultaneously offered the position of NADO head. At right about the same time, USA, UK, France, Germany, Poland, as well as every other NATO member country announces it is pulling out of NATO and joining NADO. Sweden and Finland also announce they are joining NADO and withdraw their still-pending NATO applications.

Step 3) With no funding and no budget remaining, and no members other than Turkey left, NATO has no option but to sell its office space and other infrastructure. Curiously, there turns out to be a willing buyer - NADO.

Step 4) If Turkey wishes, it may join NADO and join the party. Or Turkey can just stay in NATO and have a defensive alliance with itself. Either way, whatever Erdogan prefers is fine.



For bonus points, you can perform a similar operation with the European Union, the European Junction, and Hungary.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,054
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: January 08, 2023, 06:50:59 PM »

That's nice. One way or the other the goal needs to be to strip from the problem children states that don't contribute much the veto power.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: January 08, 2023, 08:11:15 PM »

That's nice. One way or the other the goal needs to be to strip from the problem children states that don't contribute much the veto power.

In NATO Turkey is both the biggest problem child and one of the biggest contributors.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,775


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: January 08, 2023, 11:11:06 PM »

Turkey has a very impressive military and a deep historic rivalry with Russia going back over 300 years and being basically constantly true. That said, Erdogan's "play both sides against the middle/appeal to Turkic roots in Azerbaijan and Central Asia to create a Turkish bloc" foreign policy is going to conflict with the rest of NATO regularly.

Turkey's a big boy and doesn't really need the United States or NATO to protect it. I said nearly a year ago here Turkish military could take the Russians already and that's way truer than it ever was. Turkey isn't a charity case like some rich NATO countries that don't want a real military because the US will take care of them, Turkey can and does defend itself quite effectively. That said, if they want to prevent Sweden from joining over bulls**t PKK harboring reasons (hopefully they'd still let Finland in?) and want to help Russia avoid sanctions etc, I think that NATO should look for other options after a certain point. Turkey's goals are just not the same goals as the rest of NATO.

Turkey would be fine without NATO. Maybe even more than fine. Turkey is a rising power, not a falling power like most of the main Western European NATO partners. And NATO would be more than fine without Turkey. I don't even think there'd need to be intense bitterness about it, but if the AKP wins Turkey's next election, saying "bon voyage, good luck with having Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan replace us as your main partners" is totally fair and merited.
Logged
Lord Halifax
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,312
Papua New Guinea


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: January 10, 2023, 02:06:58 PM »

(hopefully they'd still let Finland in?)

The Finnish government has made it clear they won't join without Sweden since that would leave them without strategic depth and their militaries cooperate closely, so it doesn't really matter.

The Turkish military hasn't really been tested against a peer adversary and the country's economy and political system have significant structural weaknesses, so it remains to be seen whether it's really a rising power in the long run.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: January 10, 2023, 07:00:22 PM »

Nobody is scared of Turkey's military.
Logged
Unbeatable Titan Susan Collins
johnzaharoff
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 955


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: January 11, 2023, 10:00:34 PM »

That being said, I find the Swedish PM's language much more pessimistic than previous statements. I'm not going to read too much into it beyond this assessment.

So here's the play if things are still not sorted following the Turkish election.

Step 1) A new organization called The North Atlantic Defense Organization is created. It is identical to NATO, except that it has a different letter in the 3rd word forming its NADO acronym. All current NATO members as well as Sweden and Finland are eligible to join NADO, should they wish to do so.

Step 2) Jens Steltenberg announces he is resigning as head of NATO, and by coincidence, is simultaneously offered the position of NADO head. At right about the same time, USA, UK, France, Germany, Poland, as well as every other NATO member country announces it is pulling out of NATO and joining NADO. Sweden and Finland also announce they are joining NADO and withdraw their still-pending NATO applications.

Step 3) With no funding and no budget remaining, and no members other than Turkey left, NATO has no option but to sell its office space and other infrastructure. Curiously, there turns out to be a willing buyer - NADO.

Step 4) If Turkey wishes, it may join NADO and join the party. Or Turkey can just stay in NATO and have a defensive alliance with itself. Either way, whatever Erdogan prefers is fine.



For bonus points, you can perform a similar operation with the European Union, the European Junction, and Hungary.

Sounds similar to the Plan if the war ends with the West agreeing that Ukraine can't join NATO

The founding of a new defense alliance- NATOU- The North Atlantic Treat Organization with Ukraine 
Logged
warandwar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 870
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: January 11, 2023, 10:26:33 PM »

Kurdish people getting murdered for voting for the wrong party, maybe?
Turkey's military is very well equipped and funded.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: January 11, 2023, 11:37:49 PM »

Kurdish people getting murdered for voting for the wrong party, maybe?
Turkey's military is very well equipped and funded.
You know what I meant.
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,315


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: January 12, 2023, 04:59:28 AM »


The Greek and Armenians are. Then that’s said the Turkish military had a lot of problems in Syria, when they invaded the Kurdish controlled areas.
Logged
Torrain
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,063
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: January 12, 2023, 07:11:19 AM »


Logged
Conservatopia
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,016
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 0.72, S: 8.60

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: January 12, 2023, 10:15:59 AM »

That being said, I find the Swedish PM's language much more pessimistic than previous statements. I'm not going to read too much into it beyond this assessment.

So here's the play if things are still not sorted following the Turkish election.

Step 1) A new organization called The North Atlantic Defense Organization is created. It is identical to NATO, except that it has a different letter in the 3rd word forming its NADO acronym. All current NATO members as well as Sweden and Finland are eligible to join NADO, should they wish to do so.

Step 2) Jens Steltenberg announces he is resigning as head of NATO, and by coincidence, is simultaneously offered the position of NADO head. At right about the same time, USA, UK, France, Germany, Poland, as well as every other NATO member country announces it is pulling out of NATO and joining NADO. Sweden and Finland also announce they are joining NADO and withdraw their still-pending NATO applications.

Step 3) With no funding and no budget remaining, and no members other than Turkey left, NATO has no option but to sell its office space and other infrastructure. Curiously, there turns out to be a willing buyer - NADO.

Step 4) If Turkey wishes, it may join NADO and join the party. Or Turkey can just stay in NATO and have a defensive alliance with itself. Either way, whatever Erdogan prefers is fine.



For bonus points, you can perform a similar operation with the European Union, the European Junction, and Hungary.

Sounds similar to the Plan if the war ends with the West agreeing that Ukraine can't join NATO

The founding of a new defense alliance- NATOU- The North Atlantic Treat Organization with Ukraine 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization feat. Ukraine (Taylor's Version)
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: January 12, 2023, 01:29:28 PM »

The Greek and Armenians are. Then that’s said the Turkish military had a lot of problems in Syria, when they invaded the Kurdish controlled areas.

Since everybody is acting like they don't know what I meant, I'll clarify.

The U.S. is not scared of Turkey's military. Happy?

Maybe, all of you in Europe are terrified based on these responses lol.
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,315


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: January 12, 2023, 01:35:42 PM »

The Greek and Armenians are. Then that’s said the Turkish military had a lot of problems in Syria, when they invaded the Kurdish controlled areas.

Since everybody is acting like they don't know what I meant, I'll clarify.

The U.S. is not scared of Turkey's military. Happy?

Maybe, all of you in Europe are terrified based on these responses lol.

Not really, I expect that the moment Turkey fought a peer or even a near peer, they would show a lot of problem and they would be worsen by Erdogan purges of the military. The fact that most of Turkey’s experience is fighting a asymmetric enemy and occupy hostile territory make it likely they would get a rude awakening, when people shoot back. We could see it in Syria, where Turkey took significant losses against the semi-conventional army of YPG, very similar to the problems Israel had with Hezbollah in the last invasion of Lebanon.
Logged
ηєω ƒяσηтιєя
New Frontier
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,254
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: January 12, 2023, 02:11:43 PM »

Not really, I expect that the moment Turkey fought a peer or even a near peer, they would show a lot of problem and they would be worsen by Erdogan purges of the military. The fact that most of Turkey’s experience is fighting a asymmetric enemy and occupy hostile territory make it likely they would get a rude awakening, when people shoot back. We could see it in Syria, where Turkey took significant losses against the semi-conventional army of YPG, very similar to the problems Israel had with Hezbollah in the last invasion of Lebanon.
The last sentence of my post wasn't 100% serious.

Was the "lol" not an indicator?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.085 seconds with 11 queries.