2000: 65+ voters were D+4, 18-24s were tied. 2016, 65+ were R+8, 18-24s were D+21. What changed? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 11:53:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  2000: 65+ voters were D+4, 18-24s were tied. 2016, 65+ were R+8, 18-24s were D+21. What changed? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000: 65+ voters were D+4, 18-24s were tied. 2016, 65+ were R+8, 18-24s were D+21. What changed?  (Read 2137 times)
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


« on: April 18, 2022, 02:12:56 PM »

It was a mix of both I think. There were still a lot of GI Generation and even a few lost generation voters at that time that were lifelong new deal Democrats. In many areas they were some of the only Democrats left which explains the hard right swing of many counties over the next decade. Others did swing to the right and I do think a lot of the younger voters in 2000 became more left-leaning as they aged and became more educated and downwardly mobile post-2008.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 10 queries.