I'm not exactly supportive of condemnations for...actions unrelated to gameplay.
...
The other problem with listing him as SD's (current or prior) Attorney General would presumably be that in-game such a person already exists as an NPC.
Obviously the spirit of the resolution has my full support but I'm trying to untangle the logical endpoints of such an action here.
Im fine denouncing him but it appears his gameplay was pre-reboot and is thus not canon (he hasnt been on this site since 2005), so must of this resolution is a nullity. An amended resolution listing him as SD Attorney General wod probably be what we need and would likely garner unanimous support.
