Who is more likely to lose? Wild or Cartwright?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:22:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who is more likely to lose? Wild or Cartwright?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who is more likely to lose?
#1
Susan Wild
 
#2
Matt Cartwright
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Author Topic: Who is more likely to lose? Wild or Cartwright?  (Read 600 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,986
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 13, 2022, 08:51:25 AM »

Who is more likely to lose?
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,919
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2022, 08:52:32 AM »

Based on candidate quality, Wild. But based on the partisanship of the district, Cartwright. Overall, I would say Wild, but Cartwright is closely behind her.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderator
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,054


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2022, 09:37:19 AM »

Cartwright because his district is more Republican, though I think the difference will not be that significant and that they will both lose.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,342
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2022, 10:46:42 AM »

Wild
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,280
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2022, 11:11:30 AM »

Wild. I expect Cartwright to lose, but I think he'll overperform the district's partisan lean by more.
Logged
coloradocowboi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,644
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2022, 11:36:39 AM »

I think Cartwright is a slight favorite right now. He also had the added benefit of running against a look, whereas Lisa Scheller is quite moderate. Or by todays standards for the GOP at least.

I still think both will narrowly pull through. But wild is more vulnerable
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,144
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2022, 05:27:20 PM »

Cartwright has the less favorable district but has a very well-established brand in it, that actually became slightly more Democratic in redistricting, and has historically over-performed. Therefore I say that Wild is more likely to lose even though she has the better district.

But, gun to my head, I say that both end up losing still.
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,719


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2022, 10:10:25 PM »

One thing do note is both did very similarly in 2020. Post redistricting, both of their districts remained basically in tact, but Cartwrights district actually got a point bluer while wilds got like 6 points redder. Def Cartwright, sure candidate quality is becoming less of a factor but still enough to close a 3 point gap in tooling partisanship
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,839
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2022, 09:40:19 AM »

They both lose, but I think Cartwright does better given the partisan lean of his district. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.216 seconds with 15 queries.