Louisiana 1920 vs 1964
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2025, 04:30:38 PM
News: Election Calculator 3.0 with county/house maps is now live. For more info, click here

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Louisiana 1920 vs 1964
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Louisiana 1920 vs 1964  (Read 439 times)
Forum explorer
Rookie
**
Posts: 53
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 15, 2022, 11:03:24 AM »

What happened here? It’s almost like a 1:1 reverse.
1920
1964
Logged
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2022, 12:00:18 PM »

What happened here? It’s almost like a 1:1 reverse.
1920
1964

Northern Louisiana is like the rest of the Deep South - it was solidly and faithfully Democratic for a long, long time, even in Republica landslides such as 1920, but as Democrats embraced civil rights, they began supporting candidates who were less pro-civil rights (i.e., not Democrats). 1964 was the epitomy of this as LBJ was staunchly pro-civil-rights and Barry Goldwater (though well-intentioned) was against, leading to many ancestrally Democratic counties - including those in northern Louisiana - to swing massively rightwards and support Goldwater (in many cases, the first time ever these counties voted Republican).

Don't know about Southern Louisiana but it appears to have been more Catholic and less 'Deep South' in culture, also more urban, and thus less extreme and more prone to voting the way the nation did (thus in 1920 backing Harding, who won in a landslide, and in 1964 LBJ, who similarly won in a landslide).
Logged
seeking mystical annihilation
discovolante
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,437
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2022, 07:20:31 PM »

In 1920, Acadiana was alienated by the Wilson administration's tariff policies, especially on sugar (the region's main export). This is also seen in 1936, with Assumption Parish swinging hard to Landon because of FDR's tariff policy. The region was also whiter and thus much less dominated by racial tensions than parts north which stayed on the Democratic line.

In '60 and '64, Cajun Catholics were the most loyal Democratic bloc, as was typical for older Democratic coalitions, but boosted by personal support for JFK. Here, the aforementioned racial issues caused the north to break for Goldwater but was not so salient in Acadiana.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 9 queries.