Did Nixon actually underperform in 1968? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:39:38 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Did Nixon actually underperform in 1968? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Did Nixon actually underperform in 1968?  (Read 2692 times)
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


« on: June 17, 2022, 04:13:48 PM »

I think that Humphrey ran a very strong campaign given how weak he was coming out of the convention. He did an excellent job of clawing back WWC voters in the north who might have potentially gone over to Wallace and also managed to win Maine which at that time was a fairly impressive feat for a Democrat given that it's something FDR wasn't able to pull off once and Johnson only did in the Goldwater landslide. Meanwhile Nixon ran an antiseptic stage managed campaign and probably came off as a coward for his refusal to debate. If HHH had had just another week he probably would have won easily.
Logged
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,444
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2022, 03:08:45 PM »

I think that Humphrey ran a very strong campaign given how weak he was coming out of the convention. He did an excellent job of clawing back WWC voters in the north who might have potentially gone over to Wallace and also managed to win Maine which at that time was a fairly impressive feat for a Democrat given that it's something FDR wasn't able to pull off once and Johnson only did in the Goldwater landslide. Meanwhile Nixon ran an antiseptic stage managed campaign and probably came off as a coward for his refusal to debate. If HHH had had just another week he probably would have won easily.

The main reason he won ME - or only reason I should say - was Muskie. Don't think he would have otherwise.

He did win by a more comfortable margin then you’d expect though if Muskie was the only factor. I think that rural New England trended left significantly between 1960 and 68. Look at how much Humphrey outperformed Kennedy in 60 in even Massachusetts and I think that it might be the sign of a regional trend that bleeds over into Maine.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.