See now this is completely unnecessary on Poilievre's part. By all accounts, his basic pocketbook campaign was leading to high support among CPC supporters, with some polling suggesting he had a shot at a first-ballot victory. And this was a message he could stick to until 2025 and take to the voting public, because "I will make your life more affordable and less burdensome" is a message that works anywhere. Going down the deep end of WEF conspiracy theories and the like is handcuffing himself and the party in a general election - unless of course he pivots away from it, but O'Toole and more recently Kenney have shown, once you unleash the beast, don't just assume you can tame it.
I don't understand how any conservative voter could be against this policy. Even giving the WEF the benefit of the doubt they are not the type of organization that advocates policies that are compatible with either fiscal or social conservatism. Why should MP's who claim to be conservative attend their events?
