LibPa
Newbie
Posts: 1
|
|
« on: January 03, 2004, 11:54:13 PM » |
|
Has anyone paid attention to the 2003 elections? Louisiana and Pa being more Dem. and Kentucky and Miss. going Rep? What was the difference? In Pa., more minority voters in the cities did come out, but that is only part of the story. Lancaster, York, Adams, Dauphin - combined equals Philly - voted more Rep. than ever. The other small cities and the rural industrial areas voted more Dem than ever. These areas have not gained new voters, nor the Reps. lost votes. Inactive Dems. came out this year to boost Dem. totals. These blue collar voters came to vote for an unashamedly pro-choice, liberal Democrat in Baer. They are not conservative, they will vote for a real Dem or not vote at all. Southern Evangelicals have become more and more of a Rep. certainty (a danger to them in itself), but the rural blue collar Catholic areas of Ohio, Pa., and Michigan do not have new Rep. votes, only many Dems. who just don't vote. They come out for the genuine article. (Baer is not Catholic, so it wasn't that.) If their turnout is decent, Ohio is Dem in 2004. That is just enough, is it not?
|