WIKIPEDIA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 11:41:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  WIKIPEDIA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Is it reliable?
#1
Yes (R)
#2
No (R)
#3
Yes (D)
#4
No (D)
#5
Yes (I/O)
#6
No (I/O)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: WIKIPEDIA  (Read 909 times)
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,221
Ukraine


« on: January 22, 2022, 12:23:52 PM »

I tend to use Wikipedia relatively often.

It's more often reliable than not and good for looking up simple statisticts and facts like how big the population of the state of Vermont is etc. Adding citations to the facts given in the articles - especially when it comes to more complex issues - is imperative though.

The most annoying thing, when you happen to witness them, are the edit wars. For insance, I recently witnessed one on the page for "La République En Marche!". People argued over whether LREM is a centre, centre-right, or centre-left party and kept changing the article accordingly (by now it's settled and they returned to "centre" again).

Sometimes they also develop a habit to delve into obscure idiosyncraties, like the extensive article on the "Mitt Romney dog incident".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.