Why don’t defeated presidents usually go for comebacks? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:39:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why don’t defeated presidents usually go for comebacks? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why don’t defeated presidents usually go for comebacks?  (Read 625 times)
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,727
United States



« on: January 18, 2022, 10:16:24 AM »

Well basically all the defeated presidents since 1900 other than Ford or Trump lost by pretty large margins in the EV so really that only left Ford and Trump to make potential comebacks. The only reason Ford didnt run was cause Reagan ran otherwise he probably wins the 1980 election in a comeback imo.

Id argue HW didnt lose by much either given he lost the tipping point state by less than 5 but to most people he seemed to have lost by a a pretty easily plus he pretty much was ready to pass the torch to Jeb as soon as he lost with W as a backup if Jeb lost in 1994(which he did).


Yup, that's a good explanation. The only exception is Hoover, who attempted to win the GOP nomination at some point in 1940. But his name pretty much toxic in electoral politics post-1932, as he suffered the worst incumbent defeat in history, even way worse than Carter. If he was the nominee in 1940, FDR would have completely destroyed him again.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.