What would a Ron Desantis vs Hillary Clinton map look like?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 10:00:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  What would a Ron Desantis vs Hillary Clinton map look like?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would a Ron Desantis vs Hillary Clinton map look like?  (Read 1016 times)
Cyrusman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,354
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 10, 2022, 09:52:41 PM »

In a rare turn of events where neither Biden or Trump runs and Hillary decides to run again and gets the nomination; how would you see this race going?
Logged
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,931
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2022, 03:11:24 PM »



Wisconsin is proably out of reach for Clinton but she wouldnt ignore it this time. PA is proably very tight as are Arizona and Georgia.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2022, 03:18:03 PM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2022, 04:17:28 PM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee
Logged
David Hume
davidhume
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,628
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: 1.22

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2022, 05:42:58 PM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:


Not sure if DeSantis comes closer to win MN or NM. Without Green or other leftwing parties on ballot, NM may be easier.
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2022, 08:53:16 PM »

It wouldn't be pretty for Democrats, that's for sure.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2022, 01:29:33 AM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



This. DeSantis would almost certainly win the popular vote, probably by mid-single digits, and I wouldn't be surprised if we saw a substantial third-party vote eating into the Democratic vote share as well, as in 2016.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2022, 05:49:34 AM »

Again Hillary won't be the Nominee in 2024
Logged
Inmate Trump
GWBFan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,066


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -7.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2022, 08:32:26 AM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee



Hillary was the American people's choice.  Never forget that.


But I do agree that she won't be the nominee.  She won't run.  These rumors are nothing more than right wing hard-on's for her, that they've had for decades.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,737
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2022, 04:39:03 PM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee



Hillary was the American people's choice.  Never forget that.


But I do agree that she won't be the nominee.  She won't run.  These rumors are nothing more than right wing hard-on's for her, that they've had for decades.

Also want to chime in and say that it used to be very popular to blame the loss on Hillary, but Biden’s extremely narrow win vindicated her to some degree. She was up against Democratic malaise and a country that largely believed it was impossible for Trump to win. Biden had none of that, and also had the advantage of mail-in voting being so damn easy.

Blame the American people for screwing up 2016, because the choice should have been really clear.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,030
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2022, 04:43:42 PM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee



Hillary was the American people's choice.  Never forget that.


But I do agree that she won't be the nominee.  She won't run.  These rumors are nothing more than right wing hard-on's for her, that they've had for decades.

Also want to chime in and say that it used to be very popular to blame the loss on Hillary, but Biden’s extremely narrow win vindicated her to some degree. She was up against Democratic malaise and a country that largely believed it was impossible for Trump to win. Biden had none of that, and also had the advantage of mail-in voting being so damn easy.

Blame the American people for screwing up 2016, because the choice should have been really clear.

The American people are quite literally never to blame for your candidate failing to convince them that he or she is the best option.  That's the whole point of elections...?  To suggest otherwise discredits any Democratic victories, as well.
Logged
CookieDamage
cookiedamage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,048


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2022, 08:35:42 PM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



Yeah you've become a total hack.
Logged
deluxedriver
Rookie
**
Posts: 25
Australia


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2022, 10:13:52 PM »

2016 + republicans winning NV, NH and maybe NM, CO, VI and MN depending on VP's and debates.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2022, 11:22:45 PM »

2016 + republicans winning NV, NH and maybe NM, CO, VI and MN depending on VP's and debates.

Lol he is losing to Biden, Rs are never gonna win NM and D's arent gonna win TX
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,722
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2022, 11:24:27 PM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



Yeah you've become a total hack.

Look at his user prediction he has NM going R too
Logged
Hammy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,708
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2022, 11:46:13 PM »

2016 + republicans winning NV, NH and maybe NM, CO, VI and MN depending on VP's and debates.

None of these are going Republican without a third party, especially since the Virgin Islands don't vote in presidential elections.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,936
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2022, 03:06:16 AM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



Yeah you've become a total hack.

Do you think Clinton would defeat DeSantis? Or that it would be as close as 2016, with her winning the popular vote?
Logged
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,689
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2022, 08:52:40 AM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



Yeah you've become a total hack.

Do you think Clinton would defeat DeSantis? Or that it would be as close as 2016, with her winning the popular vote?
He's right. Hilary is unpopular and I think the election goes the way it would of gone in 2016 if someone else ran besides Trump. The only difference would be that in 2016 against Rubio or even Cruz, she probably would lose Virginia, Colorado, and Nevada while hanging on in PA, MI, WI. If it wasn't for Trump, Hilary was shaping up to be John Kerry 2.0 in 2016 but yeah, in 2024, she would probably lose NV, NM, NH, ME, and maybe MN, too.
Logged
Grassroots
Grassr00ts
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,741
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 2.09

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2022, 10:21:08 AM »

Give or take NM, but no reason to believe this would be particularly close:



This.
Logged
Unelectable Bystander
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,099
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2022, 10:25:51 AM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee



Hillary was the American people's choice.  Never forget that.


But I do agree that she won't be the nominee.  She won't run.  These rumors are nothing more than right wing hard-on's for her, that they've had for decades.

Also want to chime in and say that it used to be very popular to blame the loss on Hillary, but Biden’s extremely narrow win vindicated her to some degree. She was up against Democratic malaise and a country that largely believed it was impossible for Trump to win. Biden had none of that, and also had the advantage of mail-in voting being so damn easy.

Blame the American people for screwing up 2016, because the choice should have been really clear.

Ah yes it’s always the fault of the voters when they don’t choose democrats, how could we have forgotten?
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,737
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2022, 10:57:16 AM »

Hillary cost D's 3 judges on SCOTUS she won't be the Nominee
Hillary was the American people's choice.  Never forget that.


But I do agree that she won't be the nominee.  She won't run.  These rumors are nothing more than right wing hard-on's for her, that they've had for decades.

Also want to chime in and say that it used to be very popular to blame the loss on Hillary, but Biden’s extremely narrow win vindicated her to some degree. She was up against Democratic malaise and a country that largely believed it was impossible for Trump to win. Biden had none of that, and also had the advantage of mail-in voting being so damn easy.

Blame the American people for screwing up 2016, because the choice should have been really clear.

The American people are quite literally never to blame for your candidate failing to convince them that he or she is the best option.  That's the whole point of elections...?  To suggest otherwise discredits any Democratic victories, as well.

You mean you make the correct decisions all the time about literally everything in your day-to-day life? People make bad decisions every day! I’m not going to hold up an election as being any different. The American people literally chose this guy:



So they got it wrong. I’m prepared to call a spade a spade. You can say my position discredits Democratic victories, but I prefer to look at it as discrediting the country as a whole… and that seems about right. It’s happening here too, so please don’t think I have a particular disdain for America.

Cheers!
Logged
Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,245
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2022, 01:42:01 PM »

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.237 seconds with 12 queries.