The UK with Dems/GOP
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 06:08:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  The UK with Dems/GOP
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
Author Topic: The UK with Dems/GOP  (Read 4952 times)
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,510


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 12, 2022, 07:35:52 PM »
« edited: January 12, 2022, 07:55:34 PM by Boobs »

I know this is a sensitive topic, and ultimately a doomed project regardless, but I tried to make a semi-realistic map of the constituencies of the UK voting in a scenario where it was effectively a two-party system of (American) Democrats and Republicans. However, the scenario is not "How would the UK vote" if it became part of the US tomorrow. Rather, there's an assumption of some long-term historical adjustment in voting patterns as well as the parties' appeals and bases.

Partially, I was inspired by this tweet, which obviously created a very unrealistic scenario but did do it based on demographic modeling.



Instead I chose to do my map rather subjectively, although I'm sure most knowledgable people would be able to find dozens of disagreements, rightfully so, and I hope I can foster some interesting discussion at the very least.

The main problems from the start:
1. The United Kingdom is far more white than the United States, so a simple racial breakdown would obviously result in far too many Republican seats. Therefore, Democrats do far better among white voters and especially with white voters with no university education/qualifications. Minorities in the UK are far more likely to be South Asian and/or Muslim than in the United States, both of which would likely be solid Democratic groups (despite being less educated in general than their American equivalents), while Black and Caribbean voters in the UK have an obvious counterpart. It's possible non-British whites (in particular recent immigrants) could be the equivalent of Hispanic voters in the US - a nominally Democratic group that is trending away from being so.
2. The United Kingdom is significantly more urban, and specifically, denser than the United States. Even rural areas in the United Kingdom are more densely dotted with villages and such. Furthermore, the United Kingdom is geographically smaller, so cities are far more connected to one another, so rural areas are far less remote as well. To add to this, rural areas, at least in southern England, are generally well-off and decently affluent/middle class. This would entail a Democratic landslide if we go solely off of density as a determinative factor (and it is, in a sense, quite determinative in the United States)
3. The United Kingdom is more irreligious than the United States, and the religious in the UK are not as fanatical or evangelical as they are in the US. Gay marriage is at around 80-85% approval in the UK, higher than in the US, and abortion is a much less salient issue. On those notes, Democrats would dominate in the UK.
4. The constituent nations of the United Kingdom (Scotland, Wales, NI) do not have an equivalent in the US.

I chose to accommodate for these differences, implying better Democrat performances with white voters, while the GOP would do better in some urban areas and with irreligious voters.

Thankfully, there is at least a very useful starting point for the modern American alignment in the UK: the Brexit referendum. I think it is fair to say that most Remain areas in England would be a solid base for Democrats - generally more educated and socially liberal, with a "global" (scare quotes because globalism is an overwrought term) viewpoint.

However, Democrats would still win many Leave areas, especially those in urban centers and with large minority populations.

Without further ado, the map:



In general:

Urban centers - both leave and remain, white and nonwhite, deprived and affluent, well educated and poorly educated - would vote Democratic. A lot of this is to do with self-sorting in the United States, but it seems rather applicable here as well.

Tourist centers and seaside resorts would also vote Democratic. Areas with mining or other resource extraction industries would tend to vote GOP. (Welsh Valleys will be addressed below).

Well educated, Remain-y suburbs would vote Democratic - see Hertfordshire, Surrey, Oxfordshire, etc - while Brexit-y suburbs vote GOP, such as Essex and Kent.

Deprived central urban areas, as mentioned above, still vote Democratic despite their reception to Brexit. Suburban and exurban deprived areas, however, are more likely to be GOP, unless they are also home to a significant minority population.

Jews in this scenario would be a solid Democratic group, especially considering that there is not a significant Orthodox Jewish population in the UK. This makes Hendon, Finchley, Barnet, Bury, and East Renfrewshire some of the more (historically) solid Democratic urban-suburban areas.

Irish Catholics, both in Northern Ireland and in Merseyside and Wirral, are a solid Democratic constituency.

While Scotland is a relatively left-leaning nation, it would be a bit silly to have all constituencies vote Democratic. Edinburgh and Glasgow would obviously be Democratic strongholds, as well as the Clydeside and many of the middle class suburbs. Aidirie and other more working-class, formerly industrial suburbs seem like the few possible areas for the GOP to gain a foothold in the commuter belt. Additionally, some areas more dependent on oil would also be receptive to the GOP.

Areas where minority languages (Gaelic, Welsh) are prominent are considered to be Democratic-leaning areas, although it is possible they may swing away a la far Northern Maine francophones. Possibly.

The problem child: Wales. Specifically, the Welsh Valleys. The most accurate American equivalents are solidly Republican, but that seems very silly and unsatisfying for some of the safest Labour parts of the country. I chose to split the difference, with certain areas voting D and others GOP, partially off of relative Brexit support. But ultimately, that is the part of the country I am most unsatisfied with, and I would enjoy some (hopefully constructive) criticism.

Ultimately we end up with 350 Democrats and 300 Republicans, equivalent to a 234-201 split in the US, similar to the results after the 2018 election.

I want to thank poster Alcibaides for his help thoughout this wee project.

Have (hopefully not too infuriating) fun.
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,920
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2022, 09:08:37 PM »

Nice!
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,141
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2022, 12:00:22 AM »

I wonder what a GOP victory map looks like.
Logged
Dereich
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,893


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2022, 12:15:18 AM »

While I do appreciate the effort you put in on this there's something I have to mention: why would you use non-Atlas colors on a map of the UK? That initial tweet map did the same thing; US colors on a UK map just feels wrong.
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,068


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2022, 02:59:40 AM »

Would English Republicans resemble Massachusetts Republicans?
Logged
Gary JG
Rookie
**
Posts: 68
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2022, 08:59:20 AM »

I question whether a small r Republican Party would have much appeal to right wing UK voters.   It should change its name to the Royalist Party.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,601
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2022, 10:22:34 AM »

In reality, even with all else being equal both Wales and Scotland would probably be less receptive to a British GOP than that - but maybe England slightly more so.

Agree that our "Dems" would have an in-built advantage though.
Logged
Conservatopia
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,182
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 0.72, S: 8.60

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2022, 12:43:27 PM »

In reality, even with all else being equal both Wales and Scotland would probably be less receptive to a British GOP than that - but maybe England slightly more so.

Agree that our "Dems" would have an in-built advantage though.

I wonder though if Wales isn't perhaps a bit like West Virginia. There are similarities beyond the superficial.
Logged
Vice President Christian Man
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,352
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2022, 01:05:54 PM »

Would English Republicans resemble Massachusetts Republicans?

I've never been to the UK but judging based off of most of the conservatives in my state, I think they'd be similar in most ways but the UK Conservatives are far too nativist and nationalistic for the average Massachusetts Republican.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,601
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 13, 2022, 01:35:30 PM »
« Edited: January 13, 2022, 01:39:54 PM by CumbrianLefty »

In reality, even with all else being equal both Wales and Scotland would probably be less receptive to a British GOP than that - but maybe England slightly more so.

Agree that our "Dems" would have an in-built advantage though.

I wonder though if Wales isn't perhaps a bit like West Virginia. There are similarities beyond the superficial.

Maybe a few, arguably. But my point is partly that both Scots and Welsh can be considered "minority" voters in a way, if you are taking a UK context. So maybe a bit comparable to Hispanics in the US.

(and yes they swung GOP last time, but are still majorly Dem)
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,837


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2022, 02:37:41 PM »

Good work!  First thoughts for Scotland is that it's quite good based on your parameters but Livingston would be Democratic (as a commuter belt 'New Town'), Coatbridge should be Democratic as it's relatively loyal to Labour even today with Labour in the doldrums and Gordon and Aberdeenshire West should probably be swapped.

I can definitely see 'protestant' Lanarkshire being Republican post 2016 though.
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,068


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 13, 2022, 03:21:18 PM »

Jews in this scenario would be a solid Democratic group, especially considering that there is not a significant Orthodox Jewish population in the UK. This makes Hendon, Finchley, Barnet, Bury, and East Renfrewshire some of the more (historically) solid Democratic urban-suburban areas.

British Jewry is more Orthodox and traditional than American Jewry, including a sizeable nominal Orthodox population. Most who belong to synagogues belong to Orthodox synagogues.  Reform Judaism is weak in the UK. 
Logged
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,510


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 13, 2022, 03:26:11 PM »

Jews in this scenario would be a solid Democratic group, especially considering that there is not a significant Orthodox Jewish population in the UK. This makes Hendon, Finchley, Barnet, Bury, and East Renfrewshire some of the more (historically) solid Democratic urban-suburban areas.

British Jewry is more Orthodox and traditional than American Jewry, including a sizeable nominal Orthodox population. Most who belong to synagogues belong to Orthodox synagogues.  Reform Judaism is weak in the UK. 

Right. I believe I meant Hasidism, which I think is much less prevalent in London (outside of Hackney) than in the greater NYC area.
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 845
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 13, 2022, 05:03:02 PM »

I wonder though if Wales isn't perhaps a bit like West Virginia. There are similarities beyond the superficial.
I’m not so sure. The Welsh Valleys had 55%-60% Leave votes in 2016, while Wales as a whole voted the same as the UK and still stands out as much more Labour than a simple demographic model would suggest. I think we can be pretty confident West Virginia would be much more pro Brexit and culturally conservative. The Welsh Valleys would therefore be more comparable to places like the Wyoming Valley (Scranton) which had enduring Democratic strength until Clinton and still aren’t completely gone, while West Virginia (and similar parts of Kentucky, Ohio etc) would be more like County Durham and the Midlands where Republicans would be winning seats well before Clinton (most of the non-metropolitan Midlands would probably be gone by 2000).
Logged
SnowLabrador
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,577
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 13, 2022, 08:28:35 PM »

The Democrats would win in a landslide. The UK might be one of the more right-wing countries in Europe, but it's not that right-wing to support the GOP on any level.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,601
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 14, 2022, 08:18:03 AM »

The Democrats would win in a landslide. The UK might be one of the more right-wing countries in Europe, but it's not that right-wing to support the GOP on any level.

"I haven't actually read the original post in this thread" Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,609
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2022, 11:48:05 AM »

The general view amongst historians of South Wales is that the part of the United States that works as the best analogue for The Valleys would be the coalfields of Central Appalachia, so Southern WV and Eastern KY. And it happens that Harlan, KY has a roughly similar position in American Labor History as the Rhondda does in British Labour History. No analogue is perfect and there are a few issues with this one: the South Wales coalfield was immediately adjacent to coastal urban centres with their metallurgical industries and ports, its heyday began earlier and lasted for much longer, the region was politically important and influential at a national level in a way that Central Appalachia never was and as brutal as the social impact of the decline and death of heavy industry in the region has been, the existence of a Welfare State and all kinds of governmental Regional Policies over the decades means that the region, though diminished and no longer home to the dynamic and confident society that Dai Smith called 'the World of South Wales', is not actually dying.

There's an obvious temptation - given substantial Welsh emigration to the region in the 19th century - to think of the Anthracite mining district of North Eastern Pennsylvania as an analogue instead, but there are a few problems with this. The principle one is that the region was (and is) far too urbanised: the largest settlement in The Valleys is Merthyr Tydfil and its population peaked at 80,000, which is not only substantially less than Scranton but is actually less than Wilkes-Barre. And that eighty thousand includes all of the outlying townships such as Dowlais that would likely not have been incorporated into the borough in the United States as well as the villages of the Merthyr Vale (of which the best known is Aberfan) which certainly would not have been. Another is geological rather than geographical: although the western end of the South Wales coalfield was an Anthracite producing region, the overwhelming majority of the coalfield produced Steam Coal of varying grades. This might seem like a rather arcane point, but it really isn't: this fact meant that the economic health of the region during its heyday was dependent on a market that was very volatile and much influenced by international factors, which had a major impact on the industrial and political culture of the region to say nothing of the resulting population instability.

Which is a long and hyper-focused way of bringing us to the increasing difficulty of doing this kind of project, as fun as it undoubtedly is. American voting patterns have become increasingly strange from a European perspective (and often look even stranger once look you at detailed results) which makes getting things to fit rather hard. And one reason for this is that the divergent political histories of the United States and Western Europe mean that often the places that have the most in common in most respects are now very different in other ways: in this case it means that even the worst patches of postindustrial despair in Britain are nothing like what can be found in the various Rust Belts of the United States, but similar comments apply to other types of area.
Logged
Boobs
HCP
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,510


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 14, 2022, 01:53:39 PM »

Thank you Al for this, I appreciate it. It does bring up a point about the - not exactly certain how to phrase this, but - geographic distribution or human geography of population in the UK vs the US. In the sense that contemporary American urban areas are far larger, if also more suburban, than British ones, while Britain (by virtue of its smaller size, earlier industrialization, and in general the continuance of it being inhabited by the same group of people, under the same general society for a thousand or more years compared to the three hundred year inhabitation of the Americas by Europeans) lacks the truly remote rural areas that are present in America - and thus emerges the dichotomy in influence and "worldliness", for lack of a better term (connectiveness, were it a word), between these analogous areas.

Another obvious reason for the issue is the lack of rigid class voting in the United States. The old world class system does not exist in the US, for many reasons, and even where & when a similar structure emerged in America, rarely did that result in a politic that resembles European voting patterns (such as the South for much of its history, as sectional/cultural issues overruled class-based ones).

Which is a long and hyper-focused way of bringing us to the increasing difficulty of doing this kind of project, as fun as it undoubtedly is. American voting patterns have become increasingly strange from a European perspective (and often look even stranger once look you at detailed results) which makes getting things to fit rather hard. And one reason for this is that the divergent political histories of the United States and Western Europe mean that often the places that have the most in common in most respects are now very different in other ways: in this case it means that even the worst patches of postindustrial despair in Britain are nothing like what can be found in the various Rust Belts of the United States, but similar comments apply to other types of area.

In many senses, I agree. The "strangeness" of politics in different countries is clear and I think almost impossible to appreciate without having lived in the country or countries themselves. And the contrast with the "[x politician] would be a member of [y party] in [z country]" memes, really does make it obvious that politics is far more than just - and far more interesting than - alignments about policy and ideology.

I do have some questions I think you might able to answer. While they're often grouped together as the Welsh Valleys, do the various individual valleys have significant differences between them that would make them more or less likely to vote Democratic in this hypothetical scenario? Evidently, in the real-world alignment, they do all fit quite well together as Labour constituencies. But for example, would the Rhondda's religious history (both historical and its contemporary irreligion) and relatively long Welsh-speaking history make it more likely to be a Democratic constituency? I'm not too familiar on the differences between the Welsh Valleys, only their overall character.
Logged
progressive85
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,312
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: January 14, 2022, 10:33:45 PM »

Would Cities of London and Westminister be very Republican?  Always was confused by seeing Mark Field (is that his name?) win every single year in what I would think would be a very very blue district in the U.S... isn't it like our Manhattan districts?
Logged
JimJamUK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 845
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2022, 07:29:13 AM »

Would Cities of London and Westminister be very Republican?  Always was confused by seeing Mark Field (is that his name?) win every single year in what I would think would be a very very blue district in the U.S... isn't it like our Manhattan districts?
The Upper East Side is overwhelmingly Democratic and Cities of London and Westminster is more socially mixed, so yeah. Middle class, metropolitan, remain voting Tories and especially Lib Dems would largely be Democrats. See also, inner London seats like Kensington, Chelsea and Fulham, and all of Wandsworth, as well as more suburban areas like Twickenham and Finchley and Golders Green. Put it this way, if Democrats aren’t massively over-performing Labour in these sorts of places, then where would they be?
Logged
Samof94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,312
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: January 15, 2022, 08:04:04 AM »

The Democrats would win in a landslide. The UK might be one of the more right-wing countries in Europe, but it's not that right-wing to support the GOP on any level.
The GOP could do well in Poland to be fair.
Logged
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,697
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: January 15, 2022, 08:56:51 PM »

Anyone brave enough to do the US with UK parties? Or at least the English parties since NI and the Plaid Cymru/Scottish National Party wouldn’t really work well in any serious fashion.
Logged
Oryxslayer
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,725


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2022, 09:07:46 PM »

Anyone brave enough to do the US with UK parties? Or at least the English parties since NI and the Plaid Cymru/Scottish National Party wouldn’t really work well in any serious fashion.

The original twitter poster of this regression did it in inverse as well for the US, but using only the 3 main English Parties.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,625
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: January 16, 2022, 01:09:37 AM »

Anyone brave enough to do the US with UK parties? Or at least the English parties since NI and the Plaid Cymru/Scottish National Party wouldn’t really work well in any serious fashion.

The original twitter poster of this regression did it in inverse as well for the US, but using only the 3 main English Parties.
That map doesn't see to make a lot of sense. Surely NE Ohio would be better for a social democratic/union dominated than Southern Ohio? Why would Labor do better in say Denton + Collin? A lot of the assumptions are whack.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,625
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2022, 01:10:56 AM »

Anyone brave enough to do the US with UK parties? Or at least the English parties since NI and the Plaid Cymru/Scottish National Party wouldn’t really work well in any serious fashion.
Al tried.

Then there's this thread.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.061 seconds with 12 queries.