What would a modern day 1896 election look like?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:56:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What would a modern day 1896 election look like?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What would a modern day 1896 election look like?  (Read 1137 times)
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 01, 2021, 09:56:16 PM »

What would a modern day election similar to 1896 look like? Who would be in the McKinley and Bryan roles?
Logged
Sea-Spit
Beatlesfan02
Rookie
**
Posts: 31
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2021, 01:51:18 AM »

So for Brian I see Brown, Baldwin, Sanders, or possibly Tester. While these guys don't exactly match Brian in terms or policy and regional appeal. They definitely fit his most of his mold In that they're populists from Midwestern/Western states.

For McKinley, I see any pro big business Republican from the Northeast and Midwest. So basically Baker, Scott, Sununu, Collins, Murkowski, DeWine, Portman etc.

The map would probably look something like this:
https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=da9u

I would envision the moderate Sunbelt sates going to the Republican Ticket in this scenario  and the classic trio of WI, MI, and PA would be firmly Democratic. While the more hotly contended swing states would be in the Midwest and Mountain West.
Great question btw!
Logged
Tekken_Guy
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,973
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2021, 10:31:59 AM »

So for Brian I see Brown, Baldwin, Sanders, or possibly Tester. While these guys don't exactly match Brian in terms or policy and regional appeal. They definitely fit his most of his mold In that they're populists from Midwestern/Western states.

For McKinley, I see any pro big business Republican from the Northeast and Midwest. So basically Baker, Scott, Sununu, Collins, Murkowski, DeWine, Portman etc.

The map would probably look something like this:
https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=da9u

I would envision the moderate Sunbelt sates going to the Republican Ticket in this scenario  and the classic trio of WI, MI, and PA would be firmly Democratic. While the more hotly contended swing states would be in the Midwest and Mountain West.
Great question btw!


Who would a Democratic McKinley and Republican Bryan be?
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,106
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2021, 11:15:05 AM »

So for Brian I see Brown, Baldwin, Sanders, or possibly Tester. While these guys don't exactly match Brian in terms or policy and regional appeal. They definitely fit his most of his mold In that they're populists from Midwestern/Western states.

For McKinley, I see any pro big business Republican from the Northeast and Midwest. So basically Baker, Scott, Sununu, Collins, Murkowski, DeWine, Portman etc.

The map would probably look something like this:
https://www.yapms.com/app/?m=da9u

I would envision the moderate Sunbelt sates going to the Republican Ticket in this scenario  and the classic trio of WI, MI, and PA would be firmly Democratic. While the more hotly contended swing states would be in the Midwest and Mountain West.
Great question btw!


Who would a Democratic McKinley and Republican Bryan be?

Josh Gottheimer and Josh Mandel
Logged
GregTheGreat657
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,928
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.77, S: -1.04

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2021, 07:27:23 PM »

Richard Ojeda vs. Mike DeWine
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,743


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 15, 2021, 05:50:42 PM »

Glen Youngkin vs AOC
Logged
Make America Grumpy Again
Christian Man
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,513
United States
Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -2.26

P P P

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 15, 2021, 06:27:28 PM »

Ron DeSantis vs Thom Hartmann
Logged
Shaula🏳️‍⚧️
The Pieman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,308
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 23, 2021, 04:52:15 AM »

Correct answer.
Logged
Andrew Yang 2024
Captain Thunder
Rookie
**
Posts: 140
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2021, 10:42:53 PM »

Jon Tester vs Rob Portman.
OR
Krysten Sinema vs Josh Hawley.
Logged
Biden his time
Abdullah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,644
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2022, 11:41:01 PM »

If we truly went back to an 1896 where it's big business vs. anti-corporations and we got poverty as a large deciding factor, I think these are the states favored for both sides.


Image Link

Modern Day Bryan
Modern Day McKinley

This also assumes the working-class candidate doesn't curbstomp the party of the elite and that the parties are relatively evenly matched.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,743


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 10, 2022, 01:49:10 AM »

If we truly went back to an 1896 where it's big business vs. anti-corporations and we got poverty as a large deciding factor, I think these are the states favored for both sides.


Image Link

Modern Day Bryan
Modern Day McKinley

This also assumes the working-class candidate doesn't curbstomp the party of the elite and that the parties are relatively evenly matched.

1896 had no where near the class based divide as people think. Keep in mind McKinley did pretty well with low paid industrial workers in the Midwest and North East while Bryan did exceptionally well with Rich Farmers in the West and South.


Also keep in mind that while 1896 looks close compared to 20th century maps, it was still the biggest electoral win since 1872 so it wasn't as close as people really think now days.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 11 queries.