Why did Gore lose Ohio and Missouri?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:28:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did Gore lose Ohio and Missouri?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did Gore lose Ohio and Missouri?  (Read 1153 times)
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 684


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 29, 2021, 04:42:51 PM »

Gore came undescribably close in Florida - the home state of his opponent's brother was decided by just one sole pip!

But he lost Ohio and Missouri by about a whopping, staggering, gigantic 350 compared to it.

Why?

Had he won either one, he would've been commander-in-chief.

He even won both of them twice in his VP bids!
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2021, 06:23:24 PM »

Cultural/social issues. CNN said at the time that exit polls showed gun owners gave Bush the edge in OH.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,449
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2021, 06:25:26 PM »

I suspect being associated with Bill Clinton probably hurt him more here than many other places because of the impact of NAFTA on many workers in the mfg and related sectors impacted.

Can't really blame Nader on this one, and unlike 2004 there wasn't a stealth evangelical "culture war" ballot issue designed to turnout and mobilize evangelical voters.

In retrospect '08 / '12 was probably the high point for DEM PRES nominees in OH if you look not only at Obama's ability to dramatically increase Working-Class AA voters, combined with also performing relatively well in rural WWC areas in SE OH and WWC Industrial Workers in NE OH.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,449
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2021, 07:23:12 PM »

Cultural/social issues. CNN said at the time that exit polls showed gun owners gave Bush the edge in OH.

Not too surprised at that having lived in Ohio as recently as 1996 and certainly there was still a bit of residual anger over the assault weapons ban.

I guess one way of looking at it would be that if you're party is taking hits at the PRES level for backing an unpopular (in Ohio for sure) free trade bill, then how can you expect to retain voters on the basis of economic policy while meanwhile other issues like social policy (such as perceptions of candidates on gun policy) start to become more paramount.

Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 29, 2021, 07:27:37 PM »

Ohio was a lot closer than expected - his campaign had actually triaged the state, assuming there was no hope of holding it. This, in turn, is why it became the absolute obsession of the Kerry campaign four years later.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,679
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2021, 07:50:58 PM »

NAFTA
Logged
TransfemmeGoreVidal
Fulbright DNC
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,446
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2021, 08:08:24 PM »

Definitely NAFTA, he could probably have countered that with a pro-labor midwestern runningmate like Dick Gephardt though. One of countless reasons that Lieberman was one of the worst VP picks of all time, maybe even worse then Sara Palin who at least had some value for McCain in motivating conservative base voters.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2021, 10:38:54 PM »

Kerry's focus on OH in 2004 had much more to do with the massive job losses in the state than Gore's performance in 2000.
Logged
South Dakota Democrat
jrk26
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,398


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2021, 11:04:59 PM »

Ohio was a lot closer than expected - his campaign had actually triaged the state, assuming there was no hope of holding it. This, in turn, is why it became the absolute obsession of the Kerry campaign four years later.

Yes, I believe I read somewhere (possibly in Jeff Greenfield's book - Oh Waiter!  One order of Crow) that they were behind by like 13 points in the state when they decided to triage it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.