How can Dems improve with rural whites? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 05:28:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  How can Dems improve with rural whites? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How can Dems improve with rural whites?  (Read 2705 times)
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,607
United Kingdom


« on: December 10, 2021, 05:48:11 PM »
« edited: December 10, 2021, 05:55:37 PM by Statilius the Epicurean »

It'd unfortunately require a continuation of an unsustainable energy policy. A major factor in why rural areas as a whole have become more conservative is because of their local economy's dependence on fossil fuels. This is one of the primary reasons Appalachia first swung so hard for Dubya in 2000.

It's easy to talk about investing in more sustainable energy such as solar/wind/nuclear and conservationist measures for protection of timber in the abstract as a public good to combat climate change. However, it must be acknowledged there are frictional costs to this type of disruption, and there should be accommodations to transition rural areas which see a fair amount of wealth creation from fossil fuel extraction, refinement/processing, production in power plants, and distribution. Likewise most areas with low population densities tend to be reliant on motor vehicles for transportation as most American infrastructure is designed with the implications of one owning car.

Dems/progressives need to sell these consumers on the transition to electric as well as why a restructuring of energy supply will ultimately produce economic benefit. We will all see different adverse effects of climate change, the problem is its harder to convince the electorate of that while most of those challenges are still abstract. Even worse, it'll be too late to do anything by the time those challenges are concrete.

Yes, the Dem climate change platform is the most important problem for this.  

I would say climate and guns. Democratic/liberal rhetoric on guns is corrosive in rural areas and a major policy change between 2012 and 2014/16 was the Sandy Hook massacre in December of 2012 and Democrats raising the salience of gun control legislation again. One underrated reason why Sanders swept rural areas in the 2016 primary was because Hillary's main attack on Bernie from the left was his record on guns, which wasn't exactly pro-NRA but as a Vermont politician not down-the-line progressive.

It's also been one of the biggest drivers of suburban gains the other way for Democrats.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.