Which British monarchs were strict and which ones were lenient?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:13:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Which British monarchs were strict and which ones were lenient?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Which British monarchs were strict and which ones were lenient?  (Read 770 times)
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 683


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 15, 2021, 08:22:49 PM »

I know Queen Victoria and George V were strict and Edward VII was lenient, but what about the others?
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2021, 09:13:10 PM »

Strict in terms of what?

Style? Personality? The way they raise their children?
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,769
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2021, 10:44:16 AM »

Prince Philip had the reputation of a very "traditional" type as far as bringing up kids was concerned.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2021, 12:14:19 PM »

Prince Philip had the reputation of a very "traditional" type as far as bringing up kids was concerned.

Yes. He was traditional, but snobbish in the way he viewed his own daughter-in-law, Diana, especially days after her death.

He viewed Hollywood figures as beneath him, he was perplexed to why she was probably the first royal to have Hollywood/International celebrity friends and it has fallen to Harry and Meghan now.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2021, 09:25:35 PM »

George IV was very lenient in his dietary habits.
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2021, 09:27:14 PM »

He viewed Hollywood figures as beneath him


Wow, based
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2021, 09:36:58 PM »

Prince Philip had the reputation of a very "traditional" type as far as bringing up kids was concerned.

Yes. He was traditional, but snobbish in the way he viewed his own daughter-in-law, Diana, especially days after her death.

"But"?
Logged
All Along The Watchtower
Progressive Realist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,479
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2021, 09:48:46 PM »

Prince Philip had the reputation of a very "traditional" type as far as bringing up kids was concerned.

Yes. He was traditional, but snobbish in the way he viewed his own daughter-in-law, Diana, especially days after her death.

"But"?

Yes, Prince Philip was a solid tradsnob toward Diana of Wales, not one of those pretentious New Money snobs you hear about these days, oh no.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2021, 11:26:29 PM »

Prince Philip had the reputation of a very "traditional" type as far as bringing up kids was concerned.

Yes. He was traditional, but snobbish in the way he viewed his own daughter-in-law, Diana, especially days after her death.

"But"?

Traditional in the way how most commoner fathers raise their children, to hunt, to fish, ride bikes. He served in the Royal Navy.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,123
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2021, 11:38:27 PM »

Yet in the 50s it was the exact opposite dynamic, with Phillip trying to modernize and reform operations of the palace and Elizabeth the Queen Mother reacting in horror over such things. An example that I recall being that Phillip wanted to use radios like in the navy, instead of the traditional hand written note carried at as snail's pace from one side of the palace to the other via a footman.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,680
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2021, 02:06:36 PM »

Not sure if Philip was ever exactly snobbish towards Diana, or even if it is possible for anyone (other than, maybe, a Habsburg) to be snobbish towards a member of the Spencers, one of the grandest aristocratic families in Europe.
Logged
afleitch
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,847


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2021, 02:58:59 PM »

Not sure if Philip was ever exactly snobbish towards Diana, or even if it is possible for anyone (other than, maybe, a Habsburg) to be snobbish towards a member of the Spencers, one of the grandest aristocratic families in Europe.

We'll never know how the Sainted Diana was actually treated by anyone or how she treated others until all of us are long gone. It's more of a circus now that it was back when Mary of Teck was busy being a kleptomanic.
Logged
Plankton5165
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 683


P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2022, 01:49:31 AM »

I've been talking about parenting style.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,243
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2022, 11:29:20 AM »

Phillip's early life made him far more aware, perhaps overly so, of the potential for the system to collapse than the relatively cloistered Windsor clan: this explains why he was both frustrated by the backwardness of the family in regards to public relations and the "traditional" (probably the wrong word tbh) upbringing of Charles - for him weak and self-indulgent monarchs put the institution at risk, and so the spartan treatment was necessary.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 11 queries.