This is either an incredibly naive or an incredibly dishonest post. Neither is really charitable.
...
You are casting this as a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. You don't get to have your cake and eat it too.
lol, I've never seen Adam post such unserious, incoherent, hackish drivel in my life. It is a new low watermark for you
I think both of you are missing the point I was seriously yet facetiously trying to make.
I've never seriously believed that Presidents have control over oil prices or even most production. Fuzzy was the one ranting and raving about how the decrease in oil production is all Biden's fault - despite that occurring under the previous administration. He is the one trying to have his cake and eat it, too.
My point is that based on his way of viewing things, one would absolutely have to place the blame and burden for these losses at the foot of the President under which these conditions occurred - especially since production has not declined from the first full month that Biden took office.
You can argue we should be producing more: OK. But you don't get to measure the high watermark of a previous President under which those gains were completely lost and then in the same breath blame the next President for being responsible for them.