2004 User Predictions - Discussion
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 12:06:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 User Predictions - Discussion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 99
Author Topic: 2004 User Predictions - Discussion  (Read 867348 times)
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1600 on: March 19, 2004, 04:18:01 PM »

McCain is a Democrat, dont let the (R) fool you.

No, McCain should have an (E) by his name...for ego.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1601 on: March 19, 2004, 04:18:16 PM »

McCain is a Democrat, dont let the (R) fool you.

McCain isn't a Democrat.  As Republican Senators go, he is probably in the middle when it comes to ideology.

Well, he is liberal for a Republican.  Lets see:

Chaffee, Snowe, collins, Specter, the guy from Oregon, and then McCaim?
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1602 on: March 19, 2004, 04:18:31 PM »

McCain is a Democrat, dont let the (R) fool you.

No, McCain should have an (E) by his name...for ego.

lol
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1603 on: March 19, 2004, 06:53:19 PM »

McCain is a Democrat, dont let the (R) fool you.

No, McCain should have an (E) by his name...for ego.

McCain probably does have one of the biggest egos in the Seante, but he is far from the most liberal Republican.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1604 on: March 20, 2004, 02:39:55 AM »

Then why do you see him hanging with so many democrats? just curious.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1605 on: March 20, 2004, 02:57:22 AM »

Then why do you see him hanging with so many democrats? just curious.

I don't think that's because he's liberal - its because he's self serving and not very loyal to his party.
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1606 on: March 20, 2004, 06:09:16 AM »

The only moderate Republican who won't be either spoiled goods (McCain) or too lightweight (Giuliani) who has a shot at the GOP nomination is probably George Pataki...he's been governor of New York since 1994, could be in trouble if Spitzer runs in 06 (at this very early stage Spitzer leads amongst republicans!) so if Pataki doesn’t run in 06 and if Bush has been re-elected goes into the Administration that would place him in a powerful position to go for the GOP nomination....he'd probably be joined by Bill Owens, Bill Frist and Rick Santorum....though Santorum wouldn’t have a prayer outside of the GOP grassroots...if he where nominated which I doubt...
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1607 on: March 20, 2004, 10:01:35 AM »

Pataki is a joke at the national level.  Against Edwards in 2008 he would lose NEW YORK by 20%.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1608 on: March 20, 2004, 10:03:33 AM »

Pataki v. Edwards is a runaway.



Edwards 426
Pataki 112
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1609 on: March 20, 2004, 10:12:03 AM »

How about Colin Powell? I know its been said, but I believe that would be a good chance.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1610 on: March 20, 2004, 10:13:36 AM »

How about Colin Powell? I know its been said, but I believe that would be a good chance.

He would be a good choice (and he would be a president I could live with), but from what I hear, his wife has full control over him.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1611 on: March 20, 2004, 10:14:18 AM »

Powell would get trounced in the southern primaries though, which might make it hard for him to win the nomination.
Logged
CTguy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 742


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1612 on: March 22, 2004, 06:08:19 AM »

Colin Powell would never win, especially not in the south as someone else pointed out...

Lets not forget the fact that race is still a huge factor, especially in primaries when more extreme voters turn out.

1/10 voters still believe Interracial marriage should be banned...  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-21-gay-marriage_x.htm)

A higher ratio in the south where most Republican primary delegates come from.  Colin Powell would have no chance of winning a Republican nomination...  and he is too conservative to win a Democratic nomination.

The country is clearly not ready for a black president because there are still too many biggots out there who don't even think interracial marriage is ok... and they tend to be older and they tend to vote more than anyone else, especially in primaries.  

But I don't mind not having Colin Powell as President, he is pathetic.  
Logged
Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.
jmfcst
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,212
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1613 on: March 22, 2004, 11:38:07 AM »

Colin Powell would never win, especially not in the south as someone else pointed out...

Lets not forget the fact that race is still a huge factor, especially in primaries when more extreme voters turn out.

1/10 voters still believe Interracial marriage should be banned...  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-21-gay-marriage_x.htm)

A higher ratio in the south where most Republican primary delegates come from.  Colin Powell would have no chance of winning a Republican nomination...  and he is too conservative to win a Democratic nomination.

The country is clearly not ready for a black president because there are still too many biggots out there who don't even think interracial marriage is ok...  

I don't want to burst your bubble by informing you that the black community (which votes heavily Democratic) is against interracial marriage more than whites...so I won't.  Please pardon the interruption.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1614 on: March 22, 2004, 03:17:50 PM »

Colin Powell would never win, especially not in the south as someone else pointed out...

Lets not forget the fact that race is still a huge factor, especially in primaries when more extreme voters turn out.

1/10 voters still believe Interracial marriage should be banned...  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-21-gay-marriage_x.htm)

A higher ratio in the south where most Republican primary delegates come from.  Colin Powell would have no chance of winning a Republican nomination...  and he is too conservative to win a Democratic nomination.

The country is clearly not ready for a black president because there are still too many biggots out there who don't even think interracial marriage is ok... and they tend to be older and they tend to vote more than anyone else, especially in primaries.  

But I don't mind not having Colin Powell as President, he is pathetic.  

If any Southerners would be against Powell it would have nothing to do with his race, it would be because of his insufficient Conservatism.  Though they might be suspicious of his ideologicaly purity *because* of his race, I don't think they'd mind his race in and of itself.  
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1615 on: March 23, 2004, 02:52:58 AM »

Colin Powell would never win, especially not in the south as someone else pointed out...

Lets not forget the fact that race is still a huge factor, especially in primaries when more extreme voters turn out.

1/10 voters still believe Interracial marriage should be banned...  (http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-21-gay-marriage_x.htm)

A higher ratio in the south where most Republican primary delegates come from.  Colin Powell would have no chance of winning a Republican nomination...  and he is too conservative to win a Democratic nomination.

The country is clearly not ready for a black president because there are still too many biggots out there who don't even think interracial marriage is ok...  

I don't want to burst your bubble by informing you that the black community (which votes heavily Democratic) is against interracial marriage more than whites...so I won't.  Please pardon the interruption.

That is very true, I know a LOT of blacks who are against  interracial marriage.
Logged
Siege40
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.25, S: -4.26

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1616 on: March 23, 2004, 10:30:07 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

That is very true, I know a LOT of blacks who are against  interracial marriage.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

By that do you mean people who while they support the legal right for races to intermarry, they themselves have no plans to do so, and maybe go as far to not want their friends to do so, or do you mean people that want it illegal, again?

Siege40
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1617 on: March 24, 2004, 02:24:53 AM »

They would definately oppose their family members marrying outside their race. I dont think they really care if its legal or not. It's just not going to happen for them.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1618 on: March 24, 2004, 03:21:59 AM »
« Edited: March 24, 2004, 03:26:17 AM by StatesRights »

According to the Tampa Tribune these are the tossups for 2004 :




Ignore the shadings thats from my prediction map. They say the red are solid democrat and the blue are solid republican.
Logged
dunn
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,053


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1619 on: March 24, 2004, 03:23:14 AM »

can't see it
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1620 on: March 24, 2004, 03:37:03 AM »

I couldn't ten minutes ago, but now I can.
WV is the only really strange assessment there. There are some more where I'd consider something possible (6 of them, in fact: Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana, Colorado) but none of those is very probable.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1621 on: March 24, 2004, 03:40:40 AM »

It's so early on its very likely to change. If you notice the polls are swinging back to Bush. Kerry is being torn up and I don't think hes ready for the big leagues. The best is yet to come for him.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1622 on: March 24, 2004, 08:05:05 AM »

NH and ME will trend into solidly Democratic states.
The midwest will trend GOP but will still be in play.
Virginia will trend Dem.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,669
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1623 on: March 24, 2004, 08:13:48 AM »

NH and ME will trend into solidly Democratic states.
The midwest will trend GOP but will still be in play.
Virginia will trend Dem.

Agree's... Basically East v West IS replacing North v South
Logged
Ben.
Ben
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,249


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1624 on: March 24, 2004, 08:19:44 AM »

NH and ME will trend into solidly Democratic states.
The midwest will trend GOP but will still be in play.
Virginia will trend Dem.

Agree's... Basically East v West IS replacing North v South


I would have thought it will be the center vs the coasts?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 60 61 62 63 64 [65] 66 67 68 69 70 ... 99  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.067 seconds with 14 queries.