There’s a lot of back and forth on this…
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:09:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  There’s a lot of back and forth on this…
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Are there sufficient missing or “flipped” voters that Democrats can win back in places they were once competitive in 10-20 years ago (Florida, Ohio, Missouri, and to a lesser extent Indiana, West Virginia, and Montana) for it to make a difference? Should
#1
Yes. There are many of them and Democrats need to win them back.
 
#2
Probably not. I am sure that if the Democrats tried real hard, they could but they would start losing in places in recently competitive areas and they would be even more limited on what they could do if they won. It’s not worth it. Voters in NC,TX,AK, and
 
#3
No. The country has become too integrated and diverse for Democrats to win enough “Ancestral Democrats”.
 
#4
Hell No. These voters are either dead, stopped voting, or simply don’t care about their inductive self-interest anymore.
 
#5
Hell yes! Democrats don’t have enough votes between corralling the Krysten Sinemas and brown and black Gene Taylors of the world. They either find new voters (without losing too many of these) or they need to give another party left of the GOP a chance.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 6

Author Topic: There’s a lot of back and forth on this…  (Read 174 times)
Person Man
Angry_Weasel
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,667
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 04, 2021, 07:59:09 AM »
« edited: November 04, 2021, 08:03:59 AM by Person Man »

Are there a dozen Bill Clintons or even  Ben Nelsons in the picture for Democrats in the late 2020s and 2030s? Is that even a good thing?

Option 2 ends with saying that voters in purpling red states like NC, TX, AK and maybe in decades some future sleepers like SC, ID, UT, MS, or MT will eventually come around providing Democrats keep trying.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.208 seconds with 14 queries.