Who ran a worse campaign: Terry McAuliffe or Christy Smith?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:58:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Who ran a worse campaign: Terry McAuliffe or Christy Smith?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who ran a worse campagin?
#1
Terry McAuliffe
 
#2
Christy Smith
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Who ran a worse campaign: Terry McAuliffe or Christy Smith?  (Read 766 times)
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,106


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 10, 2021, 04:33:18 AM »

Title
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,343
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2021, 07:03:18 AM »

Smith

It’s unclear that anyone was gonna win the VA Gov race in the current environment, whereas Smith blew an extremely winnable race twice in a much less toxic political environment.
Logged
Pollster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,757


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2021, 10:01:34 AM »

Smith literally had two bites at the same apple within months of each other and appeared to learn little/nothing from her first, avoidable loss, both in relatively friendly political climates.

Terry McAuliffe's problem was that he perfectly executed the wrong strategy, and in a much more hostile political climate.
Logged
ChiefFireWaterMike
LordRichard
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,349


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2021, 10:45:35 AM »

Smith literally had two bites at the same apple within months of each other and appeared to learn little/nothing from her first, avoidable loss, both in relatively friendly political climates.

Terry McAuliffe's problem was that he perfectly executed the wrong strategy, and in a much more hostile political climate.
As the resident Garcia staffer, for much of the campaign, it seemed like she didn't even want the job. Although that, ofc, was a disaster for her, Mike's campaign was running top notch as far as I can tell, with an insane amount of canvassing and phonebanking being completed.
Logged
Rjjr77
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,996
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2021, 01:14:52 AM »

Gotta go with McAuliffe, his plan was to nationalize the race, and when the winds blew against him on that he never changed media strategy. It is like he cut all his commercials the first week then fired his camera man
Logged
Schiff for Senate
CentristRepublican
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,187
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2021, 12:30:20 AM »

Kind of tough but I vote Smith since Garcia was more openly pro-Trump than Youngkin was, 2020 was bluer than 2021 (obviously), and House races should be very polarized unless one of the candidates is a maverick (in the mold of Valadao, Katko, Fitzpatrick, etcetra).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.218 seconds with 15 queries.