Canada Federal Representation 2024
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 06:10:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Canada Federal Representation 2024
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 35
Author Topic: Canada Federal Representation 2024  (Read 50002 times)
lilTommy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,820


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: October 21, 2021, 08:28:40 AM »
« edited: October 21, 2021, 11:52:19 AM by lilTommy »

In Ontario, if we look at population Growth and Decline (chart 9)
https://www.ontario.ca/page/ontario-population-projections

In the North, only 3 Census Divisions (CD) will see populations decline (Cochrane, Timiskaming and Sudbury... not to be confused with Greater Sudbury which is the actual city. "Sudbury" is the are we know as Nickel Belt). The other CDs will either be flat or see <20% growth. I don't see the North losing seats seeing that provincially they moved in the other direction creating two more seats. There will be a push to protect the North's seat count, so I expect the boundaries to change more then a seat being lost.

In the SW, surprisingly we have 2 CDs that are seeing 0-20% growth, that being Chatham-Kent and Lambton. Middlesex is seeing >35% growth, the CDs along the 401 corridor in the SW are all seeing big population growths. The GTA CDs through to Simcoe and Durham are all in this >35% growth.

In the East, you have 5 CDs in that 0-20%, Renfrew, Lennox & Addington, Leeds & Grenville, Prince Edward and SDG. Ottawa is the only CD growing at the >35%.  

This doesn't really give a lot to play with in terms of boundary changes unless we also start to enlarge some of theses more rural CDs that are still growing, but slower in that 20-35% range.  
Logged
CascadianIndy
Cadeyrn
Rookie
**
Posts: 115
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2021, 11:13:46 AM »

https://globalnews.ca/news/8289530/bloc-quebecois-quebec-parliament-seat-proposal/

Blanchet promises to release "fires of hell" over Quebec losing a seat in Parliament.
Logged
mileslunn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,820
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2021, 03:16:17 PM »

I suspect on throne speech, that will be BQ sub-amendment and probably price BQ requires for support.  Certainly if Trudeau goes along with cutting a seat in Quebec, I suspect Liberals pay next time around in Quebec.  Tories also could have opening if they oppose this although might anger some of the Western base who feel we already give too much to Quebec.

Best solution is keep Quebec at 78 seats and add another seat to BC, Alberta, and Ontario so 2 new for BC and Ontario and 4 new for Alberta and that solves the issue.
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,452
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2021, 03:19:45 PM »

I don't see it being likely in any realistic scenario for Trudeau to cut a Quebec seat. Does he gain anything from doing it? Does it constitute a net good for him in any case?
Harming the Liberals' prospects in Quebec next time doesn't sound like something Trudeau would do.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: October 23, 2021, 06:05:54 PM »

I don't see it being likely in any realistic scenario for Trudeau to cut a Quebec seat. Does he gain anything from doing it? Does it constitute a net good for him in any case?
Harming the Liberals' prospects in Quebec next time doesn't sound like something Trudeau would do.

The thing is that Trudeau doesn't need to cut a seat, it will just happen if nothing is done.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: October 24, 2021, 05:23:47 AM »


Why would Blanchet do this? If Quebec is shrinking or growing slowly, well, too bad.
Logged
CumbrianLefty
CumbrianLeftie
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,805
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: October 24, 2021, 06:54:06 AM »


Why would Blanchet do this? If Quebec is shrinking or growing slowly, well, too bad.

SNP are doing similar over Scotland losing a handful of seats in the coming HoC review.

Standard for nationalists, in other words.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: October 24, 2021, 12:01:40 PM »


Why would Blanchet do this? If Quebec is shrinking or growing slowly, well, too bad.

SNP are doing similar over Scotland losing a handful of seats in the coming HoC review.

Standard for nationalists, in other words.

Also, it's very likely Blanchet will win this fight, so why not?
Logged
adma
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,733
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: October 24, 2021, 01:11:41 PM »


Why would Blanchet do this? If Quebec is shrinking or growing slowly, well, too bad.

Actually, by Western standards, Quebec *isn't* growing all that slowly--it's more on a growth par w/Minnesota than Michigan, put it that way.  So there's a reasonable case for them retaining that seat, particularly when the Atlantic Provinces are growing even more slowly and Man/Sask are still catching up w/stagnant or lost growth in the past, and they still retain their delegations...
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: October 24, 2021, 01:13:41 PM »

I support the increasing the size of the HoC as much as possible since it's good for COI representation and reduces malapportionment (honestly, what's stopping it from going to 500 or so? one MP per 50k people or so would be awesome), but honestly, this is just Quebec throwing a hissy fit because that's what Quebec does best.
Logged
mileslunn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,820
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: October 24, 2021, 01:24:37 PM »

I like the 100,000 rule per riding and for most of our history ridings have been smaller than that but problem is country has grown much faster and ridings not kept paced.  Sticking with constitution I would do the following:

44 for Alberta
51 for British Columbia
144 for Ontario
85 for Quebec

All other provinces would stay the same as still overrepresented and only get more when grow enough. So house would be 387 seats and while not quite perfect at least closer than it is now.
Logged
toaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 354
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: October 24, 2021, 06:40:45 PM »

I don't see it being likely in any realistic scenario for Trudeau to cut a Quebec seat. Does he gain anything from doing it? Does it constitute a net good for him in any case?
Harming the Liberals' prospects in Quebec next time doesn't sound like something Trudeau would do.
From people paying attention, it puts a sour taste is our mouths.  Why is he not listening to the recommendations by the non-partisan committee and just going in and doing what he wants.  Heck, just gerrymander everything then too, while you're at it so the Liberals will win without a fight the next 50 times.  The net good for Trudeau is that it appears as though he's *not* nosing around in what shouldn't be partisan.
Logged
StateBoiler
fe234
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,890


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: October 25, 2021, 07:39:01 AM »
« Edited: October 25, 2021, 07:43:47 AM by StateBoiler »

Since I think little of Trudeau when it comes to making tough but fair decisions, I expect the end result is the Quebec representation remains static.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 09, 2022, 09:40:27 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.
Logged
beesley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,140
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 09, 2022, 10:18:29 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 09, 2022, 10:20:42 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!

Oh, is that a Canadian version of DRA?
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 09, 2022, 10:30:25 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!

Oh, is that a Canadian version of DRA?

Yes. Developer posts on Atlas occasionally.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 09, 2022, 10:41:34 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!

Oh, is that a Canadian version of DRA?

Yes. Developer posts on Atlas occasionally.

Oh, excellent! I look forward to playing around with that.

By any chance, do you know if they have a version with 2011 census data as well? It would be greatly helpful for a project I have.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 09, 2022, 11:02:30 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!

Oh, is that a Canadian version of DRA?

Yes. Developer posts on Atlas occasionally.

Oh, excellent! I look forward to playing around with that.

By any chance, do you know if they have a version with 2011 census data as well? It would be greatly helpful for a project I have.

Hasn't been released yet. We'll have to see. What's the project?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 09, 2022, 11:11:59 AM »

Census population results were released this morning, so now we can start guessing about riding changes.



And with that comes fun!

Oh, is that a Canadian version of DRA?

Yes. Developer posts on Atlas occasionally.

Oh, excellent! I look forward to playing around with that.

By any chance, do you know if they have a version with 2011 census data as well? It would be greatly helpful for a project I have.

Hasn't been released yet. We'll have to see. What's the project?

An alternate history that involves different political divisions in North America. It'd be useful to be able to draw districts of the same size and on the same basis on both sides of the RL border.
Logged
Logical
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,769


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2022, 11:27:38 AM »

1 million people gap between quarterly population estimates and actual census numbers. Why does this happen and why do you even use different numbers to allocate seats and draw them? Is there a substantial undercount or is there something else going on here?

For comparison
 
                 Q2 2021 Population Estimates      Census Data
Canada                 38,153,211                       36,991,981   
ON                       14,795,883                       14,223,942                       
QC                         8,587,179                         8,501,833
BC                         5,185,990                         5,000,879
AB                         4,438,772                         4,262,635   
MB                         1,383,638                         1,342,153
SK                         1,180,314                         1,132,505
NS                            985,776                           969,383
NB                            785,819                           775,610
PE                             162,596                           154,331
NT                             45,629                             41,070                            
YT                              42,586                            40,232
NU                             39,336                             36,858
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,409
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2022, 11:35:43 AM »

Top 10 fastest growing federal ridings (2016-2021)

1. Edmonton--Wetaskiwin (AB) +31.9%
2. Carleton (ON) +27.7%
3. Brampton West (ON) +24.9%
4. Milton (ON) +20.1%
5. York--Simcoe (ON) +19.7%
6. Spadina--Fort York (ON) +17.9%
7. Calgary Skyview (ON) +17.6%
8. Ville-Marie--Le Sud-Ouest--Īle-des-Soeurs (QC) +17.4%
9. Simcoe--Grey (ON) +16.8%
10. Halifax West (NS) +16.3%

Top 10 depopulating ridings (2016-2021)

1. Churchill--Keewatinook Aski (MB) -6.5% *
2. Long Range Mountains (NL) -5.6%
3. Coast of Bays--Central--Notre Dame (NL) -4.5%
4. Manicouagan (QC) -4.3% *
5. Scarborough North (ON) -4.1%
6. Edmonton Strathcona (AB) -3.7%
7. Battlefords--Lloydminster (SK) -3.5%
8. Calgary Forest Lawn (AB) -3.5%
9. Mississauga East--Cooksville (ON) -3.2%
10. Timmins--James Bay (ON) -3%

Top 10 ridings by population (2021)

1. Edmonton--Wetaskiwin (AB) 209,431
2. Calgary Shepard (AB) 163,447
3. Brampton West (ON) 162,353
4. Calgary Skyview (AB) 159,642
5. Banff--Airdrie (AB) 155,580 *
6. Simcoe--Grey (ON) 151,784
7. Durham (ON) 150,235
8. Oakville North--Burlington (ON) 148,936
9. King--Vaughan (ON) 147,695
10. Niagara Falls (ON) 146,404

Bottom 10 ridings by population (2021)

1. Labrador (NL) 26,655
2. Egmont (PEI) 35,925
3. Nunavut 36,858
4. Charlottetown (PEI) 38,809
5. Malpeque (PEI) 39,731
6. Cardigan (PEI) 39,866
7. Yukon 40,232
8. Northwest Territories 41,070
9. Miramichi--Grand Lake (NB) 57,520
10. Madawaska--Restigouche (NB) 60,184

* Excludes census data for one or more incompletely enumerated reserves or settlements.

Full data: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810001001

An alternate history that involves different political divisions in North America. It'd be useful to be able to draw districts of the same size and on the same basis on both sides of the RL border.

The easiest and best way to access old census data, like 2011, is the Census Mapper website. You can create your own maps based on census data, at any geographic levels.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 10, 2022, 06:14:47 AM »

So, do we know what the seats breakdown by Province would be, barring any changes to the formula?
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,084
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2022, 07:49:07 AM »
« Edited: February 10, 2022, 07:54:18 AM by Krago »

I am working on my proposal for 342 federal ridings.  So far, I have completed Quebec and the Atlantic provinces.  I hope to have the other regions finished by the weekend.

Here is my new map so far.  Please look it over and let me know if I've made any obvious errors, especially with names.  Any suggestions for improvement are always welcome.

Enjoy.  The Fish-and-Chips riding (Carleton-Charlotte) is back!
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 10, 2022, 09:10:26 AM »

So, do we know what the seats breakdown by Province would be, barring any changes to the formula?

My understanding is that the calculation of the of number of seats each province gets is based on July 2021 population estimates, while boundaries of the the districts is based on the 2021 census. The total seats by province (barring formula changes) remains the same ones that the Chief Electoral Officer published in October.

I.e.
BC and Ontario (+1 each)
Alberta (+3)
Quebec (-1)
Everyone else (nc)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 ... 35  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.063 seconds with 11 queries.