SB 105-16: Capital Gains Inflation Deduction Act (Passed)

[Joseph Cao]

Yep, I think this is a fairer arrangement for all individuals involved.

A better cost estimate would obviously depend on how much we know about inflation ITTL as opposed to RL. If we're going off the budget I really am not sure where the inflationary value there came from (or whether it's been updated recently) but it is a start for us.

[Joseph Cao]

I know ~36 hours have passed without objection, but just to be on the safe side, senators have 24 hours to object to OSR assuming sponsorship.

[Joseph Cao]

OSR is recognized as sponsor.

[Joseph Cao]

since no one has added anything to this bill for nearly 3 weeks, I will motion for a final vote, 24?(I believe) hours to object

PSA for everyone else, not just S019: the presiding officer can handle the job of processing these motions just fine, and if the situation ever calls for backseat presiding of this kind by someone not the PPT or the Deputy, I will be sure to inform you all. Rest assured that the current situation does not require you to add the bolded when I am perfectly capable of handling the PPT's duties at present.

In any case, 24 hours to object.

[Joseph Cao]

Nobody acted on this either apparently.

With no objections, a final vote is open on the bill. 72 hours to vote; please vote Aye, Nay, or Abstain.

[Joseph Cao]

AYE.

[Joseph Cao]

Please sign this, Ishan.

Also 9 non-votes? WTF guys.

I did?

Probably should post it in here too to properly close off the thread.