Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 29, 2024, 11:09:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)  (Read 32003 times)
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« on: October 10, 2006, 04:23:17 AM »

Soulty, I hear what you're saying but I think you will have to eat it all up by election day. No matter what people want to be true, polls, taken as an average, are very seldom far off. As long as the polls show this as being (roughly) a 50-40 race, then Santorum isn't gonna win.

That being said, Deano has really entered the wrong forum. This is not a forum for Dem hacks, it's supposed to be for serious discussions about elections and politics with RESPECT for the other side.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2006, 05:14:02 PM »

Deano has really entered the wrong forum. This is not a forum for Dem hacks, it's supposed to be for serious discussions about elections and politics with RESPECT for the other side.

Is there any particular reason why you are not applying this to jfern? 

No. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.